christiefan915
Catalyst
You didn't notice it either. Admit it.I've long wondered why you're so unobservant, you know.
Maybe it's clinical.![]()
You didn't notice it either. Admit it.I've long wondered why you're so unobservant, you know.
Maybe it's clinical.![]()
The only thing I admit, Mr. Earl, is that there are two ways to designate the shutdown. Your side calls in the Schumer shutdown, mine calls it the trump or Johnson shutdown. Your side says Dems want children to go hungry and my side says repubs want to deny children the medical care they need to keep them healthy. Perspectives, eh?You have to admit, Miss Marple, that the Dems shut the government down and appear to be the bad guys.
The Schumer shutdown endangered the SNAP program with hungry children.
Then, along comes the hero, President Trump and rescues the hungry children that the Dems abandoned for “leverage.”
You really are slipping up. Martin posted this yesterday. https://www.justplainpolitics.com/t...p-administration-to-pay-food-benefits.239809/The reaction of the JPP lefties to the announcement is indeed hilarious, isn't it, Earl?
They really don't seem to have known about it until I alerted them to its existence, do they?
Bubble people.
You didn't notice it either. Admit it.
Your biased opinions is noted, and summarily rejected.
Indeed and my perspective is that the Dems wanted this shutdown to continue giving free health care to illegals and I have posted the proof, Miss Marple.The only thing I admit, Mr. Earl, is that there are two ways to designate the shutdown. Your side calls in the Schumer shutdown, mine calls it the trump or Johnson shutdown. Your side says Dems want children to go hungry and my side says repubs want to deny children the medical care they need to keep them healthy. Perspectives, eh?
The correct grammar is either: "Your biased opinions ARE summarily rejected" or "Your biased opinion IS summarily rejected."Why would I?
I didn't post it, apparently without thinking.
Y O U did.
I guess you didn't notice this, either:
Do you need to look up what "summarily rejected" means?
You really are slipping up. Martin posted this yesterday. https://www.justplainpolitics.com/t...p-administration-to-pay-food-benefits.239809/
It’s 65 degrees F. In Sevilla, Miss Marple.
Why aren’t we there?
It would be heaven, wouldn't it!It’s 65 degrees F. In Sevilla, Miss Marple.
Tapas!
Why aren’t we there?
We don't care how trump tried to spin this, only that the court ordered it to be done. And we learned that yesterday, my dear, dishonest, devious and delusional Duke of Deception.Fartin' Martin posted this:
Court Orders Trump Administration to Pay Food Benefits
If you think that means he know about POTUS' announcement, do explain how you came to that conclusion.
Search the replies.
Tell me, O Duchess of Desperate Deflection and Denial, at what time did POTUS Trump's announcement occur?
Spain is the next thing to heaven on earth, leggiecrite.It would be heaven, wouldn't it!
It would be heaven, wouldn't it?
Tortes de aciete, un vaso de vino…Flamenco en Triana.It would be heaven, wouldn't it!
We don't care how trump tried to spin this, only that the court ordered it to be done. And we learned that yesterday, my dear, dishonest, devious and delusional Duke of Deception.
Spain is the next thing to heaven on earth, leggiecrite.
Indeed, I had a friend who was dating a Spanish dancer in Triana, she was a 10… no, an 11.