What is that supposed to prove?


What is that supposed to prove?
So you got nothing. Checkmate.![]()
Never is with you.Still nothing.![]()
so you got a quote of Kirk saying any of this?Ahh, typical Maga/Alt-Right revisionism. For your education per Merriam-Webster:
Racist - 1. having, reflecting, or fostering the belief that race is a fundamental determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race.
2. of, relating to, or characterized by the systemic oppression of a racial group to the social, economic, and political advantage of another
See post #7 here for examples.
it does when they lower standards to achieve diversity.DIVERSITY DOES NOT SACRIFICE COMPETANCY.
I read a bio of Johnson and it sure seemed like 90% of Texans in those days were crude racist F****.
so you got a quote of Kirk saying any of this?
no. you don't.
the only racism left is insititutions discriminating against whites.
It is now completely clear to me that he, as is proved by his cranial formation and his hair, descends from the Negroes who had joined Moses’ exodus from Egypt, assuming that his mother or grandmother on the paternal side had not interbred with a n—–. Now this union of Judaism and Germanism with a basic Negro substance must produce a peculiar product.
In Marx and Engels’s understanding, racial disparities emerged under the influence of shared natural and social conditions hardening into heredity and of the mixing of blood. They racialized skin-color groups, ethnicities, nations, and social classes, while endowing them with innate superior and inferior character traits. They regarded race as part of humanity’s natural conditions, upon which the production system rested. ‘Races’ endowed with superior qualities would boost economic development and productivity, while the less endowed ones would hold humanity back.
Mind your manners, you worthless little bitch.One of us knows how to hurt a human being badly and quickly, and it ain't you, cocksucker.
yes they were horrible racist people.There is a difference between 'racism' and prejudice, but the nuances are beyond the ken of the left wing racists. Their Hero Karl Marx was a true racist.
Though Marx and Engels are perhaps most known for their ideas about class conflict and revolution, they both dabbled in theories—increasingly popular at the time—about race and racial hierarchies.
Not only that, but their private correspondence demonstrated an even larger degree of hostility to black-skinned people, as their writings were littered with racial slurs.
In an 1887 letter, Engels wrote that blacks were closer to “the animal kingdom” than the rest of humanity, in a reference to his mixed race son-in-law.
In a letter to Engels, Marx wrote of Ferdinand Lassalle, a contemporary socialist of his day:
Marx had ugly things to say about various other races, too, and despite being ethnically Jewish, said that the “worldly religion” of Jews was “huckstering.”
Erik van Ree, a lecturer at the Institute for East European Studies of the University of Amsterdam, wrote of Marx and Engel’s racism in a paper for the Journal of Political Ideologies. He explained how racial classifications and explanations of economic development were a component of early Marxist thought:
Importantly, van Ree concluded that Marx and Engels’ statements on race went beyond “unthinkingly repeating the stereotypes and prejudices of the day.”
This attitude is endemic among the Democrats here and throughout the Party. They think blacks can't compete, and have to rely on DEI discrimination to get jobs. In the mean time, neither left or right wing LBJ haters can come up with a single verifiable racist utterance he made, and after a long career in public service and politics. In fact he was a lot less racist than the PArty's northeastern and mid-western blocs. Even George Wallace was less racist than the average Democrat; while he believed in segregation, he also beleived in the 'separate but equal' doctrine and upped the state welfare benefits and school funding for blacks and got a big chunk of the black vote, and even the occasional NAACP endorsement.
Um. OK. I'm glad you got another braindead rant off your weak chest. Meanwhile, back in the real world, LBJ said what he said. You MAGAts are so delusional that I think most of you actually have no idea what's true and what's not anymore.Boy, wow. I guess you were educated after 2010 or something.
First off, Google is biased as a motherfucker and not really reliable and hasn't been since 2009, retard.
Secondly, Snopes IS propaganda. Even if they use legit sources, their garbage is still slanted.
I've deconstructed Snopes claims several times. Google hides the things it doesn't want you to see, ignorant boi.
Often Google shows you what they want you to see, and not what really is.
Also they track everything you do if you stay signed into them.
If you have an Android phone and sign into Google, you can't even sign out (without a factory reset) and they track everything you do and crawl your contacts and all that.
So when you wonder why you get unsolicited dildo ads, that's why.![]()
So now LBJ did say it. He just wasn't being racist when he said it.This dumbass doesn't know any facts, never read a thing, and is just parroting nonsense. And, these tards don't even realize that the quote is actually denouncing racism; yes, that's how stupid these tards are and how poor their education is.
This dishonest lying dumbass commie deviant thinks we're supposed to comply with it's silly demands or something; it has to use ignore, being completely unable to refute anything I've said, same as Douche has had to do re the board. lol
DIVERSITY DOES NOT SACRIFICE COMPETANCY. If you can prove otherwise, please do. The test for all still has to be passed.
Great! But This is what is going on with air traffic controllers
The colleges believe the FAA changes were made based on an agency diversity study that examined the race and gender of CTI graduates. In particular, the study found low numbers of black students in CTI programs and that the FAA's aptitude exam was a racial and gender diversity barrier. Under the change, candidates now take the aptitude exam after completing the biographical questionnaire...
Yes if you selectively edit Kirk's speech you can falsely make it appear like he is racist. But if you look at the whole conversation he isn't being racist. He is advocating for a system that looks at merit and not the color of a person's skin. When you look at a person's skin to determine if he does or does not get a job that is racism. Racism is hiring someone who is not as qualified for a job just because they have the right skin color. Now if you want to post his entire conversation instead of a selectively edited snippets we can discuss it.
So now LBJ did say it. He just wasn't being racist when he said it.
what did he say and what did it mean?Um. OK. I'm glad you got another braindead rant off your weak chest. Meanwhile, back in the real world, LBJ said what he said. You MAGAts are so delusional that I think most of you actually have no idea what's true and what's not anymore.
LBJ said what he said. This is a bizarre obsession that you've been carrying for days and pages. Find something to do.See how stupid you are and your weak ass attempts at trying to lie about what was said? You really are an illiterate. Obviously you were socially promoted.