Abortion

[Yakuda]

So how do you murder what is not conscious?

So I kill someone who is in a coma, that's okey dokey.

I suspect now y you'll come back with a shifting goal post. I bet I'm nostra fucking damus

 

[Into the Night]

Define life. A tumor is a form of life.

A human being is not a tumor, LeftNut.

 

[Into the Night]

So how do you murder what is not conscious?

RQAA

 

[AProudLefty]

So I kill someone who is in a coma, that's okey dokey.

A patient in coma is not brain dead.

I suspect now y you'll come back with a shifting goal post. I bet I'm nostra fucking damus

You lost the bet.

 

[AProudLefty]

A human being is not a tumor, LeftNut.

No shit, Sherlock?

 

[Yakuda]

A patient in coma is not brain dead.

You lost the bet.

There you go. You said conscious not brain dead. You fucking weasels do this every fuckig time.

 

[Yakuda]

A human being is not a tumor, LeftNut.

Leftists? Human beings or tumors?

 

[Into the Night]

No shit, Sherlock?

Then why did you say it was?

 

[Into the Night]

Leftists? Human beings or tumors?

Oddly enough...BOTH.

Human beings, but tumors in society.

Like a cancer tumor, all it knows how to do is to grow and consume more and more resources. It provides no useful function.
Only human beings can conduct such evil.

 

[AProudLefty]

Then why did you say it was?

RQAA

 

[AProudLefty]

Oddly enough...BOTH.

Human beings, but tumors in society.

Like a cancer tumor, all it knows how to do is to grow and consume more and more resources. It provides no useful function.

Inversion fallacy.

 

[AProudLefty]

There you go. You said conscious not brain dead. You fucking weasels do this every fuckig time.

Huh? Patients in coma are still conscious.

 

[Into the Night]

Gibberish.

Terminating a life is not ok with me.

You're babbling. Perhaps your neutral "dictionary" will help you?

Contract killing is illegal.

Abortion is not a set theory.

You're the one who want to create a new dictionary.

How is it an arbitrary line?

What does this look like to you?

A patient in coma is not brain dead.

You lost the bet.

No shit, Sherlock?

RQAA

Inversion fallacy.

Huh? Patients in coma are still conscious.

Roll them dice!

 

[Yakuda]

Oh

Patients in coma are still conscious.

Oh really? So you can talk to them? They just ignore people when their in their "coma"?

 

[AProudLefty]

Oh really? So you can talk to them? They just ignore people when their in their "coma"?

In some cases yes.

Consciousness in Coma Patients:
While most coma patients are thought to be unconscious, recent research suggests that some may retain a level of awareness. Studies have shown that:
Some coma patients can respond to commands or questions, even if they cannot communicate verbally.
Brain imaging techniques have revealed brain activity that may indicate consciousness.
Some patients may experience dreams or other subjective experiences while in a coma.

 

[Yakuda]

In some cases yes.

Consciousness in Coma Patients:
While most coma patients are thought to be unconscious, recent research suggests that some may retain a level of awareness. Studies have shown that:
Some coma patients can respond to commands or questions, even if they cannot communicate verbally.
Brain imaging techniques have revealed brain activity that may indicate consciousness.
Some patients may experience dreams or other subjective experiences while in a coma.

Some?! Suggest?! May? They're unconscious. We can kill them according to you. You have no problems terminating life. Embrace your evil

 

[AProudLefty]

Some?! Suggest?! May? They're unconscious. We can kill them according to you. You have no problems terminating life. Embrace your evil

Would brain dead be better for you?

 

[AProudLefty]

Some?! Suggest?! May? They're unconscious. We can kill them according to you. You have no problems terminating life. Embrace your evil

Does this look like it has a brain?

 

[IBDaMann]

Dictionaries are written by people, people who are NOT "neutral".

In fact, YOU'RE IN LUCK! I've actually just wrapped up my work of writing a dictionary. It's in my publisher's hands atm, but it'll soon be publicly available for your own perusal. It happens to have an entry within it for the term 'living human', and that definition reads: "homo sapien with a heartbeat".

I'm now going to call up my publisher so that you and I can get onto "neutral ground" with "neutral words" asap.

Well, "a fetus" is more specifically referring to an unborn child (a living human), "a pregnant woman" is more specifically referring to that child's mother, and "causing the death of the fetus" is more specifically referring to the mother contracting the killing of her child (and the disposal of the child's body) with a professional killer (a "doctor").

Why not make use of more precise language? Why not say what you really mean and mean what you really say?

Well, sure, if those people choose to set aside all rationale by rejecting set theory.

and I strongly suspect that they're purposely EVADING precise language, just like you are.

You seem to be tightening the vise.

 

[IBDaMann]

Does this look like it has a brain?

View attachment 61816

Yep, I'm looking right at it.