The Charlie Kirk Shuffle: false idol

It's fascinating to watch all the MAGATS, Alt-Rots and their sympathizers run all over the place to either try to justify or avoid admitting the racists, sexists, christo-fascist BS that Kirk grifted off of. And it ends up with them doing what the OP subject title says.

I don't know who the author is, but someone posted on either Facebook or Instagram (and I'm para-phrasing) that America is the only country where "racism" is considered an "alternative opinion"
8jho49.jpg
 
View attachment 61546
This is one reason why they hate Charlie Kirk...
 
True words it sort of like shooting MLK it doesn't matter what you think about him it was a very dark moment in our history. Personally I think MLK was a great man. His commitment to nonviolence alone was admirable. Him wanting to be judged on his character and NOT for the color of his skin goes counter to DEI.
Here stupid. Learn something:


Martin Luther King Jr.'s legacy is often invoked in discussions about affirmative action, with varying interpretations of his views. While some argue that King opposed race-conscious policies, citing his famous quote about judging individuals by the "content of their character," this interpretation overlooks his active support for affirmative action initiatives during his lifetime.​

  1. Support for Affirmative Action: King believed that a society that had historically discriminated against Black Americans must take proactive steps to rectify these injustices. He was involved in initiatives like "Operation Breadbasket," which aimed to increase employment opportunities for Black workers through measures that included racial quotas.

  2. Complexity of King's Views: King advocated for both race-based and class-based affirmative action. He recognized that while race-conscious policies were essential to address systemic inequalities, broader economic justice measures were also necessary to uplift all disadvantaged groups, regardless of race.

  3. Contemporary Misinterpretations: In recent years, some political figures and commentators have misappropriated King's words to argue against affirmative action, suggesting that his vision was one of color-blindness. However, historians emphasize that King’s advocacy for affirmative action was rooted in a deep understanding of the ongoing effects of racism and economic disparity.

  4. The Broader Civil Rights Movement: King's support for affirmative action was part of a larger agenda for racial justice that included comprehensive economic reforms. The "Freedom Budget" proposed by civil rights leaders aimed to eliminate poverty and included measures that would disproportionately benefit Black Americans, highlighting the interconnectedness of race and class issues in the fight for equality.

 
Here stupid. Learn something:


Martin Luther King Jr.'s legacy is often invoked in discussions about affirmative action, with varying interpretations of his views. While some argue that King opposed race-conscious policies, citing his famous quote about judging individuals by the "content of their character," this interpretation overlooks his active support for affirmative action initiatives during his lifetime.​

  1. Support for Affirmative Action: King believed that a society that had historically discriminated against Black Americans must take proactive steps to rectify these injustices. He was involved in initiatives like "Operation Breadbasket," which aimed to increase employment opportunities for Black workers through measures that included racial quotas.
    https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=db3a...bWF0aXZlLWFjdGlvbi8xMTA5LWFmZmlybTI1LTE&ntb=1
  2. Complexity of King's Views: King advocated for both race-based and class-based affirmative action. He recognized that while race-conscious policies were essential to address systemic inequalities, broader economic justice measures were also necessary to uplift all disadvantaged groups, regardless of race.
    https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=4c3b...yZC8xMTI4NjY5L2ZpbGVzL2Z1bGx0ZXh0LnBkZg&ntb=1
  3. Contemporary Misinterpretations: In recent years, some political figures and commentators have misappropriated King's words to argue against affirmative action, suggesting that his vision was one of color-blindness. However, historians emphasize that King’s advocacy for affirmative action was rooted in a deep understanding of the ongoing effects of racism and economic disparity.
    https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=27d0...d3MvbWxrLWRlaS1hZmZpcm1hdGl2ZS1hY3Rpb24&ntb=1
  4. The Broader Civil Rights Movement: King's support for affirmative action was part of a larger agenda for racial justice that included comprehensive economic reforms. The "Freedom Budget" proposed by civil rights leaders aimed to eliminate poverty and included measures that would disproportionately benefit Black Americans, highlighting the interconnectedness of race and class issues in the fight for equality.
    https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=1710...W50LWJleW9uZC1hZmZpcm1hdGl2ZS1hY3Rpb24v&ntb=1
You're subscribing to this fucktard Critical Theory Sociology Professor?
Damn, you're a dumbass.
"The Supreme Court’s elimination of affirmative action is undeniably a setback for racial justice—one that will lead to a substantial decline in Black and perhaps Hispanic enrollments in universities and professional schools. It will lead as well to a narrowing of the pipeline that supplies much of the nation’s leadership."
Ya know when I was in like, Jr. High, they taught us how to spot propaganda. It was in a class called "Civics".
And that sir, is propaganda. :|
I won't get into that too much because I learned that class really extra good.
Yah. All schools are not the same. You and me? We're not the same.
Individuality. Embrace it. You're a piece of shit, but embrace your individuality of being a piece of shit, k?
You might feel better. 😆
 
That she projects herself and then acts as if butter wouldn't melt in her mouth is one for a psychiatrist's couch!
You got teh bad coming your way. Bad is as bad does, and you're bad.
I bet if I boxed your ear and gave you a little life lesson somebody shoulda taught ya but never did you'd get right.
Or maybe it's true about being spoiled.
You're looking quite rotten. Perhaps the time for correcting you is long gone.
Maybe the State might have to do it.
Or The People. Either way, nobody's putting up with your bullshit, fucktard.
Go piss up a rope.
 
Here stupid. Learn something:


Martin Luther King Jr.'s legacy is often invoked in discussions about affirmative action, with varying interpretations of his views. While some argue that King opposed race-conscious policies, citing his famous quote about judging individuals by the "content of their character," this interpretation overlooks his active support for affirmative action initiatives during his lifetime.​

  1. Support for Affirmative Action: King believed that a society that had historically discriminated against Black Americans must take proactive steps to rectify these injustices. He was involved in initiatives like "Operation Breadbasket," which aimed to increase employment opportunities for Black workers through measures that included racial quotas.
    https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=db3a...bWF0aXZlLWFjdGlvbi8xMTA5LWFmZmlybTI1LTE&ntb=1
  2. Complexity of King's Views: King advocated for both race-based and class-based affirmative action. He recognized that while race-conscious policies were essential to address systemic inequalities, broader economic justice measures were also necessary to uplift all disadvantaged groups, regardless of race.
    https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=4c3b...yZC8xMTI4NjY5L2ZpbGVzL2Z1bGx0ZXh0LnBkZg&ntb=1
  3. Contemporary Misinterpretations: In recent years, some political figures and commentators have misappropriated King's words to argue against affirmative action, suggesting that his vision was one of color-blindness. However, historians emphasize that King’s advocacy for affirmative action was rooted in a deep understanding of the ongoing effects of racism and economic disparity.
    https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=27d0...d3MvbWxrLWRlaS1hZmZpcm1hdGl2ZS1hY3Rpb24&ntb=1
  4. The Broader Civil Rights Movement: King's support for affirmative action was part of a larger agenda for racial justice that included comprehensive economic reforms. The "Freedom Budget" proposed by civil rights leaders aimed to eliminate poverty and included measures that would disproportionately benefit Black Americans, highlighting the interconnectedness of race and class issues in the fight for equality.
    https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=1710...W50LWJleW9uZC1hZmZpcm1hdGl2ZS1hY3Rpb24v&ntb=1
They try to whitewash MLK
Here stupid. Learn something:


Martin Luther King Jr.'s legacy is often invoked in discussions about affirmative action, with varying interpretations of his views. While some argue that King opposed race-conscious policies, citing his famous quote about judging individuals by the "content of their character," this interpretation overlooks his active support for affirmative action initiatives during his lifetime.​

  1. Support for Affirmative Action: King believed that a society that had historically discriminated against Black Americans must take proactive steps to rectify these injustices. He was involved in initiatives like "Operation Breadbasket," which aimed to increase employment opportunities for Black workers through measures that included racial quotas.
    https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=db3a...bWF0aXZlLWFjdGlvbi8xMTA5LWFmZmlybTI1LTE&ntb=1
  2. Complexity of King's Views: King advocated for both race-based and class-based affirmative action. He recognized that while race-conscious policies were essential to address systemic inequalities, broader economic justice measures were also necessary to uplift all disadvantaged groups, regardless of race.
    https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=4c3b...yZC8xMTI4NjY5L2ZpbGVzL2Z1bGx0ZXh0LnBkZg&ntb=1
  3. Contemporary Misinterpretations: In recent years, some political figures and commentators have misappropriated King's words to argue against affirmative action, suggesting that his vision was one of color-blindness. However, historians emphasize that King’s advocacy for affirmative action was rooted in a deep understanding of the ongoing effects of racism and economic disparity.
    https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=27d0...d3MvbWxrLWRlaS1hZmZpcm1hdGl2ZS1hY3Rpb24&ntb=1
  4. The Broader Civil Rights Movement: King's support for affirmative action was part of a larger agenda for racial justice that included comprehensive economic reforms. The "Freedom Budget" proposed by civil rights leaders aimed to eliminate poverty and included measures that would disproportionately benefit Black Americans, highlighting the interconnectedness of race and class issues in the fight for equality.
    https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=1710...W50LWJleW9uZC1hZmZpcm1hdGl2ZS1hY3Rpb24v&ntb=1
They try so hard to whitewash Dr King
 
No stupid, it was a REPORT of events by the WHITE HOUSE PRESS SECRETARY. To date, NO ONE FROM THE WHITE HOUSE OF THAT ERA OR THE JOHNSON FAMILY OR ESTATE HAS DISPUTED THAT REPORT. And Moyer's was no slouch by any measure: www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/business/story/2025-06-26/bill-moyers-dead-pbs-journalist-white-house-aide

Cheeto Jeezus ass wipes like you fascinate me: you barked liked circus seals during your orange god's crusade on "Birther-gate" (or birtherism, or whatever the hell it was) based on a mind fart by some anonymous right-wing wonk. Hell, you and others continued (and may still do) to believe it DESPITE CONCRETE FACT BASED, DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY. Your orange god NEVER apologized or admitted flat out he was wrong. Instead, he did his usual BS to revise history and make himself the hero. www.politico.com/story/2016/09/donald-trump-birther-no-apologies-228289

I could waste time listing all the half-assed "theories" and out-right lies that MAGA morons like you parroted ad nausea DESPITE valid, documented proof to the contrary. But since I've just demonstrated what a intellectually dishonest/cowardly debater you are on this subject, I'll leave it to others if they are so inclined to further humiliate you.

Now, stamp your widdle feet, give a bogus laugh that no one buys and repeat your BS with the usual unsupported arrogance. Strangely entertaining.
MAGA isn't a person, Libby. Propaganda is not a proof.
 
Beg to differ. The maga/alt-right/neocon/teabagger/fibbertarian crowd are a stubborn bunch. Since they've got a LOT of corporate and rich folk stoking their hate and bigotry (while robbing them blind....but that's another story), our MSM will be bull horning this garbage for a year or two. Of course the majority of American's will just blow it off with a "gitdafuckouttahere" attitude.
You can't erase him, Libby. You can't erase TPUSA either.
 
It's fascinating to watch all the MAGATS, Alt-Rots and their sympathizers run all over the place to either try to justify or avoid admitting the racists, sexists, christo-fascist BS that Kirk grifted off of.
While you Democrats say that, it's a lie.
And it ends up with them doing what the OP subject title says.
Attempted proof by circular. Circular argument fallacy. Denial of history.
I don't know who the author is, but someone posted on either Facebook or Instagram (and I'm para-phrasing) that America is the only country where "racism" is considered an "alternative opinion"
Nope. It's just racism. You can't blame DEMOCRAT racism on anybody else, Libby.
 
Strawmen? You made the accusation. I simply proved you wrong.

But if you consider the 1st Amendment to the US Constitution a strawman, you are a lost cause.

You didn't prove shit, you just parroted some fake quote off a list. Nobody said the Constitution was a strawman, idiot; you just couldn't come up with anything intelligent to say, is all.
 
Here stupid. Learn something:


Martin Luther King Jr.'s legacy is often invoked in discussions about affirmative action, with varying interpretations of his views. While some argue that King opposed race-conscious policies, citing his famous quote about judging individuals by the "content of their character," this interpretation overlooks his active support for affirmative action initiatives during his lifetime.​

  1. Support for Affirmative Action: King believed that a society that had historically discriminated against Black Americans must take proactive steps to rectify these injustices. He was involved in initiatives like "Operation Breadbasket," which aimed to increase employment opportunities for Black workers through measures that included racial quotas.
    https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=db3a...bWF0aXZlLWFjdGlvbi8xMTA5LWFmZmlybTI1LTE&ntb=1
  2. Complexity of King's Views: King advocated for both race-based and class-based affirmative action. He recognized that while race-conscious policies were essential to address systemic inequalities, broader economic justice measures were also necessary to uplift all disadvantaged groups, regardless of race.
    https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=4c3b...yZC8xMTI4NjY5L2ZpbGVzL2Z1bGx0ZXh0LnBkZg&ntb=1
  3. Contemporary Misinterpretations: In recent years, some political figures and commentators have misappropriated King's words to argue against affirmative action, suggesting that his vision was one of color-blindness. However, historians emphasize that King’s advocacy for affirmative action was rooted in a deep understanding of the ongoing effects of racism and economic disparity.
    https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=27d0...d3MvbWxrLWRlaS1hZmZpcm1hdGl2ZS1hY3Rpb24&ntb=1
  4. The Broader Civil Rights Movement: King's support for affirmative action was part of a larger agenda for racial justice that included comprehensive economic reforms. The "Freedom Budget" proposed by civil rights leaders aimed to eliminate poverty and included measures that would disproportionately benefit Black Americans, highlighting the interconnectedness of race and class issues in the fight for equality.
    https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=1710...W50LWJleW9uZC1hZmZpcm1hdGl2ZS1hY3Rpb24v&ntb=1
And a DEMOCRAT assassinated him.
And DEMOCRATS passed affirmative action, which is just institutionalized racism.
 
Back
Top