The Charlie Kirk Shuffle: false idol

AProudLefty said:
"Advancing"?

I support equal hiring process for everyone.

Wanting to make sure they get that and that no one is being overlooked is not racist.
Click to expand...
So if two people have 3.75 and one is White degree from MIT in Mechanical Engineering. And a Black person with a 3.75 from Harvard with a Degree in Black studies and they are applying for law school who should be admitted for the last available seat.
 
TOP said:
If "DEI hiring"is in place how would a black man or woman with the right qualifications "be overlooked"?
Use gender-neutral job descriptions, blind resume screening, diverse interview panels, and skills-focused selection criteria....
No quotas, no boxes to check...just the most qualified...
Click to expand...
Are you joking, or are you completely ignorant of America's racist/sexist history, or are you in complete denial of such?
 
FastLane said:
So if two people have 3.75 and one is White degree from MIT in Mechanical Engineering. And a Black person with a 3.75 from Harvard with a Degree in Black studies and they are applying for law school who should be admitted for the last available seat.
Click to expand...
Flip a coin, or find someone with a higher G.P.A.
My GPA was 4.15. In college. Others had higher. Yeah, performance was a thing.
I was on the lower end of the really good ones.
UT kept courting me, but I knew it's the rich kids that went to that school.
Years later I made a good friend that confirmed all that.
UT is for smart kids from unlimited money. That wasn't me.
Scholarship and all, could not have hung with the crowd there.
They go there from the most money in America, for real.
Just Academics and a scholarship can't touch that.
It was a great school at that time, and probably still is.
I bet they do not play that woke garbage. I just knew I couldn't hang with the rich kids.
 
Last edited:
Taichiliberal said:
Facts, please.
Click to expand...
priceopfag.gif
 
christiefan915 said:
Magas will never admit that a DEI applicant could be the most qualified. You automatically assume they're not. If the winning applicant isn't a white male, you screech "DEI."
Click to expand...

Mr. Owl's take on MAGATs IMO is pretty accurate. He says most of them have failed in life in some way and because they weren't raised with a sense of personal responsibility, they need someone(s) to blame. Trump spent decades selling and can read a mark. He knows exactly what they want to hear and delivers it. It's' not YOUR fault. It's those immigrants, Democrats, far left radical, women, non-whites, Chinese, Mexicans, [insert name of Hated Ones du Jour here].
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Mr. Owl's take on MAGATs IMO is pretty accurate. He says most of them have failed in life in some way and because they weren't raised with a sense of personal responsibility, they need someone(s) to blame. Trump spent decades selling and can read a mark. He knows exactly what they want to hear and delivers it. It's' not YOUR fault. It's those immigrants, Democrats, far left radical, women, non-whites, Chinese, Mexicans, [insert name of Hated Ones du Jour here].
Click to expand...
That's nice, cupcake.
Half them ones you listed are Americans, but whatever, you're pretty much fucktarded. :dunno:
Trump didn't conspire to take over America, dickfaces like you being such shitheads forced us to vote for him to to kick your asses.
I'm well pleased. :)
 
It seems FastLane, Top and the usual maga/Alt-Right peanut gallery are very prolific in in posting variations of the SOS ... but to date cannot offer valid,documented source proof that DEI students, graduates, pilot trainees or subsequent certified pilots are sub-par. From them we instead get supposition, conjecture, theories, speculation, opinions and even referenced PENDING court casea. It's typical of Cheeto Jeezus."facts be damned" acolytes ... they NEVER ADMIT THEY ARE WRONG ON ANY LEVEL. If we didn't have to live with these idiots, they would be laughable.
 
FastLane said:
Itis just an educated guess based on WHAT SHE HAS POSTED.. For example she said she was a nurse that works in a memory care unit . (Most nursing homes have memory care units) Most nursing homes have a RN as the head of nursing staff then hire LPN (LVN) to dispense medications etc. Then nursing homes hire a lot of nurses aides for patient care like changing sheets, bed pans, bathing and vital signs. Since I asked her a very basic anatomy question that ANY RN should have been able to answer correctly and most LVN (LPN) cannot answer correctly because they have an abbreviated anatomy course. She quickly and CONFIDENTLY answered the question wrong and mocked me even though she was wrong. :laugh: And she posted a lie about her husband being asked to return to work with a cardiac ejection fraction of 15% which was another obvious lie or misunderstand of cardiac physiology that any decent RN living with a person with an EF of 15% would never make if she is being truthful. So if she isn't lying about being a nurse in a memory care unit I strongly suspect I'm correct.

So I didn't DOXX her nor would I but your response makes me think my educated guess is probably correct and she reported me. :laugh: It's ironic though because she DOXXed me with information she got from a PRIVATE message :laugh:
Click to expand...

My, for an innocent perp you sure are shrill, Shirley. Didn't enjoy the mild spanking from @Damocles? You should see him when he really gets pissed. lol

Actually you have stated here twice in the last week about my credentials, as a fact not a surmise. I have never posted my exact nursing designation here for obvious reasons -- stalkers like you. We all know who gave you my real name and that you looked me up in the nursing registry. Oddly enough, just like your informant did years ago. Except that SHE, despite her many issues, was smart enough to drop it at that point once she learned that I have no reason to lie about my profession. Unlike some people we know, right, stalker?

At any rate your constant attempts to denigrate my REAL profession say a lot more about you than it does about me. Try harder, Quackter. You're outclassed.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
My, for an innocent perp you sure are shrill, Shirley. Didn't enjoy the mild spanking from @Damocles? You should see him when he really gets pissed. lol

Actually you have stated here twice in the last week about my credentials, as a fact not a surmise. I have never posted my exact nursing designation here for obvious reasons -- stalkers like you. We all know who gave you my real name and that you looked me up in the nursing registry. Oddly enough, just like your informant did years ago. Except that SHE, despite her many issues, was smart enough to drop it at that point once she learned that I have no reason to lie about my profession. Unlike some people we know, right, stalker?

At any rate your constant attempts to denigrate my REAL profession say a lot more about you than it does about me. Try harder, Quackter. You're outclassed.
Click to expand...
Meh, yur a gratey fucktarded bint no matter any of that, k?
:dunno:
I'm thinking if there was a picture of "Supercunt" in an illustrated Dictionary, it would be of you. 😆
The hens makin' noise outside right now are 10X better than your toxic, traitorous bih self.
 
Last edited:
FastLane said:
Yes if you selectively edit Kirk's speech you can falsely make it appear like he is racist. But if you look at the whole conversation he isn't being racist. He is advocating for a system that looks at merit and not the color of a person's skin. When you look at a person's skin to determine if he does or does not get a job that is racism. Racism is hiring someone who is not as qualified for a job just because they have the right skin color. Now if you want to post his entire conversation instead of a selectively edited snippets we can discuss it.
Click to expand...
Nothing was edited, you stupid fucking twat. Those are the exact words he said in the exact order he said them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top