The Charlie Kirk killing is back firing badly. People everywhere have had enuff.

[Uncensored2008]

1. Obviously, you have no clue of the relevence of McCain/Feingold towards campaign finance and donor influence. So you babble MAGA mush.

The McCain Feingold rape of the 1st Amendment outlawed political speech by anyone other than the DNC controlled media 180 days prior to any election. Patently unconstitutional attack on free speech to rig the game for the democrats.

2. You are in total denial of the death toll of Palestinian innocent civilians by the IDF via bombing and starvation A scorched earth policy. Hamas got power by 55 to 45 vote, then suspended elections as dictators always do. Yahoo helped get them in power.

Totally innocent Hamas - October 7 was just good fun.

Say, I see your buddies said they are going to kill the last 45 hostages. You know, because innocent civilians take hostages - that's totally a thing. And obviously those totally innocent civilians murder the hostages - Allahu Subpar.

3. Critical based on fact is not anti-semetism, as many anti-zionist Israelis and American Jews will tell you.
4. Repeating an accusation you can't factually support makes you a liar.
5. Prove it.
6. See #3.

Already proven - you are an Antisemite preaching hatred of Jews while supporting the genocide of Jews in Israel. Hey, you're a democrat - evil is your way.

 

[Taichiliberal]

The McCain Feingold rape of the 1st Amendment outlawed political speech by anyone other than the DNC controlled media 180 days prior to any election. Patently unconstitutional attack on free speech to rig the game for the democrats.



Totally innocent Hamas - October 7 was just good fun.

Say, I see your buddies said they are going to kill the last 45 hostages. You know, because innocent civilians take hostages - that's totally a thing. And obviously those totally innocent civilians murder the hostages - Allahu Subpar.



Already proven - you are an Antisemite preaching hatred of Jews while supporting the genocide of Jews in Israel. Hey, you're a democrat - evil is your way.

1. As I thought, you haven't a clue as to what McCain/Feingold was all about. You just regurgitate right wingnut blather. Here's something for you to either learn or ignore: www.firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/bipartisan-campaign-reform-act-of-2002/
2. Are you f***ing stupid or what? I wrote, "Hamas got power by 55 to 45 vote, then suspended elections as dictators always do. Yahoo helped get them in power". As for the hostages: www.jpost.com/israel-news/politics-and-diplomacy/article-867743
3. If momma didn't tell you and you slept through high school, then let me clue you in: YOUR PERSONAL OPINIONS, SUPPOSITIONS AND CONJECTURE ARE NO SUBSTITUTE FOR VALID, DOCUMENTED FACTS AND THE LOGIC DERIVED FROM SAID FACTS .... NO MATTER HOW MANY TIMES AND WAYS YOU REPEAT THEM. Ask any high school/college debate team. Or a lawyer.

I'm not looking for you to concede a point or admit error .... insipid stubbornness is the corner stone of the Maga mook mindset. I just enjoy exposing your stupidity to the objective readers. Carry on.

 

[Uncensored2008]

1. As I thought, you haven't a clue as to what McCain/Feingold was all about.

Oh, by all means lie to me and the board - about the brutal rape of the 1st that was the McCain-Feingold Abortion of civil rights.

You just regurgitate right wingnut blather. Here's something for you to either learn or ignore: www.firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/bipartisan-campaign-reform-act-of-2002/

Dead link
http://www.firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/bipartisan-campaign-reform-act-of-2002/

2. Are you f***ing stupid or what? I wrote, "Hamas got power by 55 to 45 vote, then suspended elections as dictators always do. Yahoo helped get them in power".

Hey, I've heard that trope before. And Jews have horns - and make Matzo from the blood of Muslim babies. Your copy of "The Protocols of Zion" is clearly well worn.

As for the hostages: www.jpost.com/israel-news/politics-and-diplomacy/article-867743

You support and promote Hamas because in reality the Evilcrat party is America's own Hamas.
http://www.jpost.com/israel-news/politics-and-diplomacy/article-867743

3. If momma didn't tell you and you slept through high school, then let me clue you in: YOUR PERSONAL OPINIONS, SUPPOSITIONS AND CONJECTURE ARE NO SUBSTITUTE FOR VALID, DOCUMENTED FACTS AND THE LOGIC DERIVED FROM SAID FACTS .... NO MATTER HOW MANY TIMES AND WAYS YOU REPEAT THEM. Ask any high school/college debate team. Or a lawyer.

You don't offer "fact," you spew Antisemitic filth along with radical left propaganda and demagoguery.

I'm not looking for you to concede a point or admit error .... insipid stubbornness is the corner stone of the Maga mook mindset. I just enjoy exposing your stupidity to the objective readers. Carry on.

When I make an error, I admit it. That is yet another big distinction between decent people and leftists.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Oh, by all means lie to me and the board - about the brutal rape of the 1st that was the McCain-Feingold Abortion of civil rights.



Dead link
http://www.firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/bipartisan-campaign-reform-act-of-2002/


Hey, I've heard that trope before. And Jews have horns - and make Matzo from the blood of Muslim babies. Your copy of "The Protocols of Zion" is clearly well worn.




You support and promote Hamas because in reality the Evilcrat party is America's own Hamas.
http://www.jpost.com/israel-news/politics-and-diplomacy/article-867743


You don't offer "fact," you spew Antisemitic filth along with radical left propaganda and demagoguery.



When I make an error, I admit it. That is yet another big distinction between decent people and leftists.

1. Are you that delusional to think that by blowing more of your mental flatulence people won't notice that you don't know a f***ing thing about the contents of McCain-Feingold regarding CAMPAIGN FINANCING? Apologies about the dead link. Try this www.britannica.com/topic/lobbying

2. Translation: another willfully ignorant and proud Maga mook. Had you actually READ the content of the link, you would have noted that the source was an ISRAELI BASED NEWSPAPER/SITE. You're such a braying jackass if you continue to try and call every thing you don't like "fake news' like your feckless orange god. Here's more for you to deny: www.wionews.com/world/explained-how-netanyahu-helped-grow-hamas-which-became-the-frankensteins-monster-for-him-651336

3. Explain how your article disproves the content of mine? Seems once again you ignore what you don't like. But here's a little buzzer for you:

www.bing.com/videos/riverview/relatedvideo?&q=netanyahu+ignored+warnings+on+October+7&&mid=3EA81AF4C4C78CDC20EB3EA81AF4C4C78CDC20EB&&FORM=VRDGAR

4. Sorry gumby, but the chronology of the posts with their links to valid source material makes a fool of you. To date, YOU AVOID ADDRESSING THE CONTENT OF ANY SOURCE MATERIAL I PROVIDE. That makes you just another MAGA troll.

5. That was one of the biggest lies or examples of self delusion I've seen on this site to date. The objective reader sees your folly. All you do is just lie, deny and try to detour the conversation. Your next responses will be the same. Carry on.

 

[Uncensored2008]

1. Are you that delusional to think that by blowing more of your mental flatulence people won't notice that you don't know a f***ing thing about the contents of McCain-Feingold regarding CAMPAIGN FINANCING? Apologies about the dead link. Try this www.britannica.com/topic/lobbying

You are an angry little Stalinist - but really lacking in facts.

Your ignorance is jaw dropping. McCain-Feingold violated the United States Constitution by outlawing political speech by any but the (DNC Controlled) news media prior to any election.

{
(Sec. 101) Prohibits any funds for soft money accounts from being solicited, received, directed, transferred, or spent in the name of national political parties, Federal candidates or officials, or by joint fundraising activities by two or more party committees.

Defines Federal election activity to include: (1) voter registration activity in the last 120 days of a Federal election; (2) voter identification, get-out-the-vote, or generic campaign activity conducted in connection with an election in which a Federal candidate is on the ballot; (3) public communications that refer to a clearly identified Federal candidate and promote, support, attack, or oppose a candidate for Federal office (regardless of whether they expressly advocate a vote for or against); or (4) services by a State, district, or local political party employee who spends at least 25 percent of paid time per month on activities in connection with a Federal election.}


So this frontal assault outlawed political speech.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/house-bill/2356

Remember - when the SCOTUS found this unconstitutional (Duh!) - many provisions that limited lobbying - such as Joe Biden's solicitation of bribes from Iran and Ukraine - remained illegal.


http://www.britannica.com/topic/lobbying

2. Translation: another willfully ignorant and proud Maga mook. Had you actually READ the content of the link, you would have noted that the source was an ISRAELI BASED NEWSPAPER/SITE. You're such a braying jackass if you continue to try and call every thing you don't like "fake news' like your feckless orange god. Here's more for you to deny: www.wionews.com/world/explained-how-netanyahu-helped-grow-hamas-which-became-the-frankensteins-monster-for-him-651336

Israel is a free country and has a lot radical left press - which is just as hostile and dishonest as the DNC Propaganda Corps in America. But of course you are lying - your link is to a site from PAKISTAN.

Regardless, the trope you are chanting is an old one. The Muslim article you falsely claimed from Israel is nothing but innuendo and rumor.

3. Explain how your article disproves the content of mine? Seems once again you ignore what you don't like. But here's a little buzzer for you:

www.bing.com/videos/riverview/relatedvideo?&q=netanyahu+ignored+warnings+on+October+7&&mid=3EA81AF4C4C78CDC20EB3EA81AF4C4C78CDC20EB&&FORM=VRDGAR

4. Sorry gumby, but the chronology of the posts with their links to valid source material makes a fool of you. To date, YOU AVOID ADDRESSING THE CONTENT OF ANY SOURCE MATERIAL I PROVIDE. That makes you just another MAGA troll.

LOL

You post dead links or lie about the source and then whine.

5. That was one of the biggest lies or examples of self delusion I've seen on this site to date. The objective reader sees your folly. All you do is just lie, deny and try to detour the conversation. Your next responses will be the same. Carry on.

You are an Antisemite and a demagogue. What you post is rarely truthful and certainly not "right."

You post what furthers the agenda of the fringe left without regard for facts or reality.

 

[Taichiliberal]

You are an angry little Stalinist - but really lacking in facts.

Your ignorance is jaw dropping. McCain-Feingold violated the United States Constitution by outlawing political speech by any but the (DNC Controlled) news media prior to any election.

{
(Sec. 101) Prohibits any funds for soft money accounts from being solicited, received, directed, transferred, or spent in the name of national political parties, Federal candidates or officials, or by joint fundraising activities by two or more party committees.

Defines Federal election activity to include: (1) voter registration activity in the last 120 days of a Federal election; (2) voter identification, get-out-the-vote, or generic campaign activity conducted in connection with an election in which a Federal candidate is on the ballot; (3) public communications that refer to a clearly identified Federal candidate and promote, support, attack, or oppose a candidate for Federal office (regardless of whether they expressly advocate a vote for or against); or (4) services by a State, district, or local political party employee who spends at least 25 percent of paid time per month on activities in connection with a Federal election.}


So this frontal assault outlawed political speech.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/house-bill/2356

Remember - when the SCOTUS found this unconstitutional (Duh!) - many provisions that limited lobbying - such as Joe Biden's solicitation of bribes from Iran and Ukraine - remained illegal.


http://www.britannica.com/topic/lobbying


Israel is a free country and has a lot radical left press - which is just as hostile and dishonest as the DNC Propaganda Corps in America. But of course you are lying - your link is to a site from PAKISTAN.

Regardless, the trope you are chanting is an old one. The Muslim article you falsely claimed from Israel is nothing but innuendo and rumor.




LOL

You post dead links or lie about the source and then whine.



You are an Antisemite and a demagogue. What you post is rarely truthful and certainly not "right."

You post what furthers the agenda of the fringe left without regard for facts or reality.

1. McCain-Feingold: The BCRA attacked those loopholes in several ways. First, it raised the amounts of permitted, lawful “hard money” contributions by individuals from $1,000 per candidate per election, where it had remained since 1974, to $2,000 per candidate per election (primary and general elections were counted separately, so $4,000 per election cycle was allowed) and provided for future adjustments in accordance with inflation. It also increased FECA’s limits on aggregate contributions (per election cycle) by individuals to multiple candidates and party committees. Second, the BCRA provided, with limited exceptions, that federal candidates, parties, officeholders, and their agents could not solicit, receive, or direct soft money to another person or organization or raise or spend any money not subject to FECA limits. That provision was intended to prevent the national parties from raising money and then directing it to others in order to avoid federal limits. Accordingly, parties were prohibited from donating funds to so-called tax-exempt “527” groups, named after a provision of the Internal Revenue Code. In addition, any funds spent on “federal election activity” as defined in the BCRA were required to be raised in accordance with FECA limits. Federal election activity included any activity within 120 days of an election in which a federal candidate is on the ballot, including get-out-the-vote activity, generic campaign activity, and public communications that refer to a clearly identified federal candidate and that support or oppose a candidate for office. The new rule reversed the former practice of allowing parties to allocate generic expenses between hard and soft money depending on the number of state candidates versus federal candidates on the ballot. Now, if a federal candidate were on the ballot, all the money spent on that candidate’s behalf (with only a few exceptions) would need to be hard money raised in accordance with FECA limits.
Some provisions of the BCRA were eventually struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court in various rulings. In McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission (2014), for example, the court invalidated aggregate limits on contributions by individuals to multiple candidates or party committees; in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010) it threw out limits on expenditures by corporations or unions for independent electioneering communications; and in Davis v. Federal Election Commission (2008) it rejected the millionaire’s amendment.

Yeah, the Conservative majority on the SCOTUS ruled that money is "free speech", an apropos to a prior ruling saying that corporations have the same stature as an individual human American. That dumb ass Maga mooks like yourself who wail against "sharia law" or the Soros boogeyman or the "deep state" seem to have NO problem with a billions of corporate money literally buying an election campaign.
2. When I linked THE TIMES OF ISRAEL article, you just blew smoke and avoided it. THAT IS AN ISRAELI PUBLICATION BY ISRAELI'S, you idiot! But like a true blinders wearing Maga mook, you immediately wail a version of "fake news". Sorry, but I'll take home grown Israeli's word over yours, UNLESS YOU CAN FACTUALLY PROVE THEM WRONG. www.timesofisrael.com/for-years-netanyahu-propped-up-hamas-now-its-blown-up-in-our-faces/
3. Translation: this dumbass Maga mook lies. The link works....he just can't BS past the content, so he avoids it. Here it is again www.bing.com/videos/riverview/relatedvideo?&q=netanyahu+ignored+warnings+on+October+7&&mid=3EA81AF4C4C78CDC20EB3EA81AF4C4C78CDC20EB&&FORM=VRDGAR

5. And once again you've done EXACTLY as I said you would. So unless you've got something new besides regurgitating the SOS, I'll leave you to your folly.

 

[Uncensored2008]

1. McCain-Feingold: The BCRA attacked those loopholes in several ways. First, it raised the amounts of permitted, lawful “hard money” contributions by individuals from $1,000 per candidate per election, where it had remained since 1974, to $2,000 per candidate per election (primary and general elections were counted separately, so $4,000 per election cycle was allowed) and provided for future adjustments in accordance with inflation. It also increased FECA’s limits on aggregate contributions (per election cycle) by individuals to multiple candidates and party committees. Second, the BCRA provided, with limited exceptions, that federal candidates, parties, officeholders, and their agents could not solicit, receive, or direct soft money to another person or organization or raise or spend any money not subject to FECA limits. That provision was intended to prevent the national parties from raising money and then directing it to others in order to avoid federal limits. Accordingly, parties were prohibited from donating funds to so-called tax-exempt “527” groups, named after a provision of the Internal Revenue Code. In addition, any funds spent on “federal election activity” as defined in the BCRA were required to be raised in accordance with FECA limits. Federal election activity included any activity within 120 days of an election in which a federal candidate is on the ballot, including get-out-the-vote activity, generic campaign activity, and public communications that refer to a clearly identified federal candidate and that support or oppose a candidate for office. The new rule reversed the former practice of allowing parties to allocate generic expenses between hard and soft money depending on the number of state candidates versus federal candidates on the ballot. Now, if a federal candidate were on the ballot, all the money spent on that candidate’s behalf (with only a few exceptions) would need to be hard money raised in accordance with FECA limits.
Some provisions of the BCRA were eventually struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court in various rulings. In McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission (2014), for example, the court invalidated aggregate limits on contributions by individuals to multiple candidates or party committees; in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010) it threw out limits on expenditures by corporations or unions for independent electioneering communications; and in Davis v. Federal Election Commission (2008) it rejected the millionaire’s amendment.

Yeah, the Conservative majority on the SCOTUS ruled that money is "free speech", an apropos to a prior ruling saying that corporations have the same stature as an individual human American. That dumb ass Maga mooks like yourself who wail against "sharia law" or the Soros boogeyman or the "deep state" seem to have NO problem with a billions of corporate money literally buying an election campaign.
2. When I linked THE TIMES OF ISRAEL article, you just blew smoke and avoided it. THAT IS AN ISRAELI PUBLICATION BY ISRAELI'S, you idiot! But like a true blinders wearing Maga mook, you immediately wail a version of "fake news". Sorry, but I'll take home grown Israeli's word over yours, UNLESS YOU CAN FACTUALLY PROVE THEM WRONG. www.timesofisrael.com/for-years-netanyahu-propped-up-hamas-now-its-blown-up-in-our-faces/
3. Translation: this dumbass Maga mook lies. The link works....he just can't BS past the content, so he avoids it. Here it is again www.bing.com/videos/riverview/relatedvideo?&q=netanyahu+ignored+warnings+on+October+7&&mid=3EA81AF4C4C78CDC20EB3EA81AF4C4C78CDC20EB&&FORM=VRDGAR

5. And once again you've done EXACTLY as I said you would. So unless you've got something new besides regurgitating the SOS, I'll leave you to your folly.

That's nice.

Section 101 outlawed political speech. It is and was a violation of the United States Constitution. An attempt by the left to silence the opposition to thwart free and fair elections.

Notice - SCOTUS allowed certain provisions of MF to stand regarding soft money. But you can't outright silence the political opposition anymore.

Have a good cry, riot, do what leftists do.

 

[Taichiliberal]

That's nice.

Section 101 outlawed political speech. It is and was a violation of the United States Constitution. An attempt by the left to silence the opposition to thwart free and fair elections.

Notice - SCOTUS allowed certain provisions of MF to stand regarding soft money. But you can't outright silence the political opposition anymore.

Have a good cry, riot, do what leftists do.

Where is the quote or quotes from either yours or mine sources that state in no uncertain terms that "Section 101 outlawed free speech"? Not more of your worthless opinion, supposition or conjecture. REAL QUOTES, copy and pasted. Because what is actually stated is that SCOTUS had to CREATE the narrative that MONEY is free speech.

If you can't do that, then your just full of it as usual, and thus exposed as the 3rd rate maga troll that you are.

 

[serendipity]

See you in the street then fuck face.

 

[Hawkeye10]

The story we are being fed is as false as the story we were/are fed about JFK.

Almost certainly the Zionist Bastards did it.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Where is the quote or quotes from either yours or mine sources that state in no uncertain terms that "Section 101 outlawed free speech"? Not more of your worthless opinion, supposition or conjecture. REAL QUOTES, copy and pasted. Because what is actually stated is that SCOTUS had to CREATE the narrative that MONEY is free speech.

If you can't do that, then your just full of it as usual, and thus exposed as the 3rd rate maga troll that you are.

You really are dumb as all fuck.

Fully documented in post 605

 

[Lionfish]

 

[ULTRA MAGA]

All the more reason someone on your side of the political divide assassinated him, Stone.

What a complete and utter tool you are gramps.

 

[Freddy Figbottom]

What kind of white enclave do you live in? In Dearborn/Detroit, we have Pole Town. We have a Mexican town. We have a German town. We have blacks. We have Muslim neighborhoods. In fact, Muslim neighborhoods are sub divided by differing regions and ideas. You have a choice for foods and cultures. I think we are better for that.

better at having our nations stolen by mud people?

 

[Matt Dillon]

So you're in denial of all the TELEVISED events on Jan. 6th, the subsequent trials and executive pardons? Recorded live, analyzed, documented in court documents. You're in denial that it ONLY involves MAGA members egged on and then pardoned when convicted in a court of law by Cheeto Jeezus?

Man, whatever it is you're drinking I have GOT to try!

What was televised was deceptively edited by Pelosi and friends. That has been established, goober.

User Clip: January 6 Committee plays deceptively edited video

Trump was describing the peaceful part of the rally

www.c-span.org

Nancy Pelosi Jan. 6 footage sparks MAGA anger: 'Trump was right'

A new video has emerged showing Nancy Pelosi talking about the National Guard on January 6.

www.newsweek.com

 

[Nordberg]

What a complete and utter tool you are gramps.

Do you, in your addlepated mind, think it was a political act? It was a crazy person looking for attention and fame. Kirk came to where he was.

 

[Hawkeye10]

What is the Swamp going to do about so many people not believing the official story (which is ridiculous....obviously not true) about who did the assassination?

 

[ULTRA MAGA]

Do you, in your addlepated mind, think it was a political act? It was a crazy person looking for attention and fame. Kirk came to where he was.

My guess it was Charlie's anti trans views that set off the deranged faggot. Not politics per se I doubt the perp was partisan . Just a typical nutsy coo coo leftist. You people's brains are fucked up in a vast variety of ways.

 

[ULTRA MAGA]

What is the Swamp going to do about so many people not believing the official story (which is ridiculous....obviously not true) about who did the assassination?

Who do you think did it? Please do tell this should be good.

 

[RB 60]

My guess it was Charlie's anti trans views that set off the deranged faggot. Not politics per se I doubt the perp was partisan . Just a typical nutsy coo coo leftist. You people's brains are fucked up in a vast variety of ways.

...but the chronology of the posts...

You should know better