Indicted, for sure, both of them, Bondi will make sure of that doing whatever it takes, she knows otherwise, she’s historyI think Letitia is likely to be indicted, Comey not so much.
Indicted, for sure, both of them, Bondi will make sure of that doing whatever it takes, she knows otherwise, she’s historyI think Letitia is likely to be indicted, Comey not so much.
Got to love it, anytime a MAGA loses an election, it was crooked, and anytime the legal system doesn’t go their way, the Judge was “sympathetic,” “partisan,” “stupid,” or crooked, it as sure as the sun rising tomorrow morningShe was successful ONLY because she had a sympathetic judge (by his own admission BTW) who denied Trump a jury trial, excluded exculpatory evidence, ignored or denied witnesses, and then found Trump libel for half-a-billion in damages.
Let's start with this: Who lost money on those loans--by the terms and conditions of those loans? There has to be a party economically injured to prevail in a civil suit for damages. Show who was economically damaged and not by some coulda, woulda, shoulda, opinion but by actual documented loss. That is how civil suits normally run.
James had no party economically damaged. None. She and Eragon simply made shit up to find Trump libel for an amount that was designed to wreck him financially for political gain.
So, ad hominem rather than rebuttal. You got nothing then.Got to love it, anytime a MAGA loses an election, it was crooked, and anytime the legal system doesn’t go their way, the Judge was “sympathetic,” “partisan,” “stupid,” or crooked, it as sure as the sun rising tomorrow morning
The classic narcissism is passed from the head down
Just staring the facts, as stated, as predictable as the sun rising tomorrow, if it doesn’t go their way, it’s someone else’s faultSo, ad hominem rather than rebuttal. You got nothing then.
How the fuck can you prove Comey lied to Congress?They can prove Comey lied to Congress. Should we just turn our backs and look the other way.
I think

Everyone on Trump's shit list...is at risk of being indicted.Brennan is at risk of being indicted.
That Depends frankie.Yeah...sure you do.
Everyone on Trump's shit list...is at risk of being indicted.
You assholes applaud that.
You may one day be on that shit list.
All that makeup he wears is to add thickness to his thin skin.It's just more proof that Trump is the Petty President and continues to demean both our nation and the office of the President.
![]()
So, now you're a legal expert. It amazes me how you always come up with a way to justify your double-standard. Trump and his sons were found liable for fraud BECAUSE THEY COMMITTED FRAUD. No amount of posturing by you and the rest of the "red tie brigade" whining like bitches to anyone who would listen about how "unfair" the world is to poor fat donny!She was successful ONLY because she had a sympathetic judge (by his own admission BTW) who denied Trump a jury trial, excluded exculpatory evidence, ignored or denied witnesses, and then found Trump libel for half-a-billion in damages.
Yeah, you tried this "no one was hurt so no big deal" defense. My answer, if fraud were legal it would be legal. trump and his sons broke the law - many other prosecutions have been made by James' office for fraud before. Your cult leader WAS NOT SINGLED OUT. If you'd like I can find a source for others in NYC found guilty of fraud like trump and his sons? You won't concede I'm right, but at least you'll know I know you're wrong!Let's start with this: Who lost money on those loans--by the terms and conditions of those loans? There has to be a party economically injured to prevail in a civil suit for damages. Show who was economically damaged and not by some coulda, woulda, shoulda, opinion but by actual documented loss. That is how civil suits normally run.
And again - the "no one gets hurt" strategy works until it doesn't. If I'm an entrepreneur starting out and I do everything right, disclosing actual values of my actual assets, but the fucking trump family can run several sets of books and expect things to be hunky-dory? Nah. Good luck with your logic!James had no party economically damaged. None. She and Eragon simply made shit up to find Trump libel for an amount that was designed to wreck him financially for political gain.
This is hysterical. The auto pen was our 46th pResident.
No he is not near as smart as I am. He is probably closer to your roommate in the Memory Care Unit Frankie.How the fuck can you prove Comey lied to Congress?
Do you think he is as stupid as you?
No it is true. Who ever ran the auto pen was really more the pResident than Biden was. Sorry that you don't understand.It's petty & stupid.
No it is true. Who ever ran the auto pen was really more the pResident than Biden was. Sorry that you don't understand.
So, now you're a legal expert. It amazes me how you always come up with a way to justify your double-standard. Trump and his sons were found liable for fraud BECAUSE THEY COMMITTED FRAUD. No amount of posturing by you and the rest of the "red tie brigade" whining like bitches to anyone who would listen about how "unfair" the world is to poor fat donny!
There is no case against James. The prior AG couldn't make a case so trump has put in a stooge with one goal - to persecute those who persecuted him.
Get real
Yeah, you tried this "no one was hurt so no big deal" defense. My answer, if fraud were legal it would be legal. trump and his sons broke the law - many other prosecutions have been made by James' office for fraud before. Your cult leader WAS NOT SINGLED OUT. If you'd like I can find a source for others in NYC found guilty of fraud like trump and his sons? You won't concede I'm right, but at least you'll know I know you're wrong!
James and Eragon were out to get Trump and did so, at least temporarily. With the judgement against Trump thrown out anything remaining is moot since it's a civil case.And again - the "no one gets hurt" strategy works until it doesn't. If I'm an entrepreneur starting out and I do everything right, disclosing actual values of my actual assets, but the fucking trump family can run several sets of books and expect things to be hunky-dory? Nah. Good luck with your logic!
Trump's attacking James is to exact revenge - nothing more.
Narcissists have no humor about themselves.Well, it might be funny if Trump actually had a sense of humor about HIMSELF.
But both you and I - and everyone else - knows that thin-skinned baby Trump would be melting down if someone did something similar about him. We actually see that almost every day anyway. He'd probably be demanding that someone get fired, or investigated.
Banks are not going to admit they got screwed. It's bad for their rep. Trump broke the law, period. What about the taxing authorities trump cheated by UNDERVALUING his assets? Is that "ok" with you too?No, the argument was over whether Trump accurately valued his real estate that was collateral for a loan or not. The banks involved testified they did their own due diligence and were satisfied with the collateral and terms of the loan that was paid back in full.
You don't need to be an expert to know that 2,000 square feet is not the same as 20,000 square feet. The trump's over or undervalued their assets depending on whether they needed a loan or wanted to cheat taxing authorities.The judge--having ZERO real estate experience--arbitrarily said he found Trump had overestimated the value of the real estate. He then slapped a half-a-billion judgement on Trump even though there was no loss to any party involved.
As I explained earlier and you ignored - the people hurt were those competing for loans against trump, valuing their assets correctly, while the trumps cheated. So there WERE people hurt. And so were the taxing authorities trump cheated.In a civil suit you cannot enrich anyone beyond making them whole for any loss. There were no losses, so there was no rational means to award a judgement against Trump for anything.
Sure. Because I won't agree with your double-standards. trump broke the law - you've been after Biden with bullshit you've not been able to prove, well - the fraud was proven, and trump should take the hit, instead of being a vindictive little bitch.It is YOU that doesn't get it.
Well, sorry to disappoint you but even trump's FBI says there's no "there" there. Just another one of your Whitewater or Benghazi boondoggles!My bet is that there is far more of a real case against James than Trump. She repeatedly--not just once, but repeatedly--lied on forms to get a government backed mortgage at better terms. The paperwork stated right on it that lying was subject to penalty under law.
I keep saying he was "found liable". I do understand the difference. Try to control yourself, I know you're frustrated you've not been able to railroad your hated Democrats. It's not my fault you're on the wrong side of every issue!Fraud is a criminal case. Trump was tried civilly by James. You obviously don't grasp the difference. There was no "guilty" verdict. In a civil trial, the judgement is to award one party for damages to make them whole. No loss, no judgement against.
Yep. Politicians act politically. Prosecutors need to get convictions. That's how life works, Tiger!James was out to get trump.
Only anti-American MAGAts support a White Nationalist president and the Project 2025 agenda.Banks are not going to admit they got screwed. It's bad for their rep. Trump broke the law, period. What about the taxing authorities trump cheated by UNDERVALUING his assets? Is that "ok" with you too?
You don't need to be an expert to know that 2,000 square feet is not the same as 20,000 square feet. The trump's over or undervalued their assets depending on whether they needed a loan or wanted to cheat taxing authorities.
As I explained earlier and you ignored - the people hurt were those competing for loans against trump, valuing their assets correctly, while the trumps cheated. So there WERE people hurt. And so were the taxing authorities trump cheated.
Sure. Because I won't agree with your double-standards. trump broke the law - you've been after Biden with bullshit you've not been able to prove, well - the fraud was proven, and trump should take the hit, instead of being a vindictive little bitch.
Well, sorry to disappoint you but even trump's FBI says there's no "there" there. Just another one of your Whitewater or Benghazi boondoggles!
![]()
Federal probe into Trump foe Letitia James hits a standstill, law enforcement officials say
James, the New York attorney general, faces allegations of mortgage fraud by the Trump administration. She has denied any wrongdoing.www.nbcnews.com
"The mortgage fraud investigation into New York Attorney General Letitia James is at a standstill because federal agents and prosecutors don’t believe they have enough evidence to get a conviction if the case were to go to trial, two senior federal law enforcement officials told NBC News on Wednesday"
I keep saying he was "found liable". I do understand the difference. Try to control yourself, I know you're frustrated you've not been able to railroad your hated Democrats. It's not my fault you're on the wrong side of every issue!
Yep. Politicians act politically. Prosecutors need to get convictions. That's how life works, Tiger!
I just think it's funny that trump worshippers keep saying, out loud, "the law only applies to others" and don't even realize it!Only anti-American MAGAts support a White Nationalist president and the Project 2025 agenda.
This is why I have no sympathy for them when most of them go down the first week of the next civil war. They are truly evil people.