White House "Walk of Fame" photo of Biden replaced with Autopen... video

It's fortunate Democrats have the self-confidence to laugh at themselves. Whenever anyone says something unfriendly about trump, they either get indicted (like Comey's about to) or get canceled, like Kimmel.
They can prove Comey lied to Congress. Should we just turn our backs and look the other way.
 
Already shown to be not true. She designated the new home as a vacation residence.
Which is MOST DEFINITELY NOT a primary residence.
I have a vacation house in Hawaii and believe me, they are very, very strict about differentiating between a vacation residence and a primary residence.
We would have been prosecuted too if we had done the same as Letitia.
I’m actually surprised the state of Virginia isn’t prosecuting too.
And they still might.
Hawai’i would have.
 
Key Virginia rules and common legal requirements
  1. Tax / Residency for income tax purposes
    • You are considered an “actual resident” if you live in Virginia or maintain a place of abode there for more than 183 days in the taxable year.
    • You are considered a “domiciliary resident” if Virginia is your legal residence (i.e. your fixed, permanent home) and you have not abandoned it.
    • Even if you are physically present elsewhere, you may still be a Virginia domiciliary if you have not clearly shown an intent to abandon Virginia as your residence.
  2. Domicile / Intent / Physical Presence (e.g. for education, in-state tuition)
    • To establish a Virginia domicile for in-state educational benefits, you must have 12 months of physical presence in Virginia, plus show intent to remain indefinitely and evidence of “domicile acts” (e.g. driver’s license, voter registration, property ownership, etc.).
    • The burden is on the person to show “clear and convincing evidence” of domicile.
  3. Proof / Documentation
    To prove that a residence is “primary,” one may rely on:
    • A valid Virginia driver’s license or state ID
    • Voter registration in Virginia
    • Virginia vehicle registration
    • Owning or leasing property in Virginia
    • Utilities, mail, or other indicia showing you live there
    • Other financial or social ties to Virginia
    • Owning or leasing property in Virginia
    • Declaring Virginia as home on tax returns
    • Utilities, mail, or other indicia showing you live there


 
The irony isn't lost on me that trump, someone found liable for fraud wants to prosecute someone for fraud.
Or on me that James (and Bragg) went after Trump for political reasons and now find themselves on the receiving end of the same exact thing. Had James simply left Trump alone and stayed out of a fight she had zero business entering, Trump wouldn't be destroying her for attempting to destroy him.
 
First she would need to be indicted. The piece I said is more likely that the indictment of Comey. So... as I said in that previous post. We shall see.
No, I said, "she's not guilty, it's a hit job" and you said, "you should watch the video", meaning you feel something in the video you feel is some kind of "evidence" of her wrongdoing.

trump fired the prior attorney who couldn't indict James so - he put in a "stooge" to take the case to the grand jury. Remember what happened when trump tried to indict the guy who threw the sandwich at the ICE agent? The grand jury refused to indict - and "grand juries will indict a ham sandwich", meaning case brought by trump's AG's and prosecutors are destined to crash and burn.
 
Or on me that James (and Bragg) went after Trump for political reasons and now find themselves on the receiving end of the same exact thing. Had James simply left Trump alone and stayed out of a fight she had zero business entering, Trump wouldn't be destroying her for attempting to destroy him.
No, TA, here's the deal: She was successful in her case against trump and so all trump loyalists, including you will never forgive her. This is about retribution, nothing more. If there was a case, the prior DA trump fired would have found it. This is a hit job attempt by trump.
 
Someone didn't read the link and just assumed something. But hey, we will see.
Its a constant thing with him now as we all know. I have no clue what's up with that guy anymore. He literally does not address ANYTHING anymore,....ever. Someone could post live video of a Democrat pol eating a baby kitten and he would go into some long diatribe about how Donald Trump cheats at golf and eats too many Big Macs and not say a word about the kitten. Its crazy. He doesn't even try to address a post or a link to an article. Early dementia ? Cant stay on track to save his ass,...or keep a simple train of thought going longer then a couple of seconds. I say this because I cannot believe it is just being done out of pure stupidity. Almost NOBODY is dumb enuff to actually believe that his chosen method of debating politics could have a positive effect when anyone with an IQ even slightly higher than a pack horse knows that there is no way it possibly could. Either that or he is actually a RWer playing the role of a LWer in an attempt to make LWers look stupid. Who knows anymore. SMH.....
 
Mortgage Fraud...

Guess who else claimed two houses as their primary residence?

ProPublica found that at least three of Trump’s Cabinet members call multiple homes their primary residences on mortgages. We discovered the loans while examining financial disclosure forms, county real estate records and publicly available mortgage data provided by Hunterbrook Media.

Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer entered into two primary-residence mortgages in quick succession, including for a second home near a country club in Arizona, where she’s known to vacation. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has primary-residence mortgages in New Jersey and Washington, D.C. Lee Zeldin, the Environmental Protection Agency administrator, has one primary-residence mortgage in Long Island and another in Washington, D.C., according to loan records.
Here’s Trump’s lackey being confronted with news of Texas GOP criminal Ken Paxton claiming 3 residences as his primary homes:

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1963589049391644707
 
It's not that I care much - but why do this?

To get another dopey chortle out of the MAGA crowd?

Trump has never really understood that he's President of the entire country - not just the parts that voted for him. At a time when we're more divided than ever, I'm pretty sure stuff like this doesn't help much.
 
Mortgage Fraud...

I guess you failed to keep up with the evidence which is exculpatory.

But other document collected in the case provided by James’ attorneys to the Justice Department and reviewed by CNN show James repeatedly stating the opposite. In one email to a mortgage broker, James wrote that “this property WILL NOT be my primary residence.” And on other forms that asked whether the home would be her primary residence, James checked off “NO.”

The fact that forms have different boxes checked makes it pretty impossible to convince a jury that it was intentional fraud and not someone making a mistake in filling out the forms. Did you read every form when getting a mortgage on your house to confirm there was no mistake on it? Will a jury be willing to declare that not reading every form is a crime?
 
It's fortunate Democrats have the self-confidence to laugh at themselves. Whenever anyone says something unfriendly about trump, they either get indicted (like Comey's about to) or get canceled, like Kimmel.
It's just more proof that Trump is the Petty President and continues to demean both our nation and the office of the President.

a77435.jpg
 
No, TA, here's the deal: She was successful in her case against trump and so all trump loyalists, including you will never forgive her. This is about retribution, nothing more. If there was a case, the prior DA trump fired would have found it. This is a hit job attempt by trump.
She was successful ONLY because she had a sympathetic judge (by his own admission BTW) who denied Trump a jury trial, excluded exculpatory evidence, ignored or denied witnesses, and then found Trump libel for half-a-billion in damages.

Let's start with this: Who lost money on those loans--by the terms and conditions of those loans? There has to be a party economically injured to prevail in a civil suit for damages. Show who was economically damaged and not by some coulda, woulda, shoulda, opinion but by actual documented loss. That is how civil suits normally run.

James had no party economically damaged. None. She and Eragon simply made shit up to find Trump libel for an amount that was designed to wreck him financially for political gain.
 
Back
Top