West Point is violating the First Amendment with a crackdown on professors, lawsuit says

Hume

Verified User
NEW YORK (AP) — The U.S. Military Academy at West Point is banning opinions by professors in the classroom and some books and courses in a crackdown that violates the First Amendment, a law professor at the military school said in a lawsuit Monday seeking class action status.

Tim Bakken filed the lawsuit in Manhattan federal court and named the school and its leaders as defendants. He said he wants to protect free speech and the right to academic freedom at an institution where he has flourished despite his public criticisms of the academy and the U.S. military.

 
NEW YORK (AP) — The U.S. Military Academy at West Point is banning opinions by professors in the classroom and some books and courses in a crackdown that violates the First Amendment, a law professor at the military school said in a lawsuit Monday seeking class action status.

Tim Bakken filed the lawsuit in Manhattan federal court and named the school and its leaders as defendants. He said he wants to protect free speech and the right to academic freedom at an institution where he has flourished despite his public criticisms of the academy and the U.S. military.

He's really got no case. West Point is a US Army base and follows the UCMJ in regard to all military personnel there. The civilian staff and instructors are employees of the US Army and government. They don't get to teach whatever-the-fuck they want, and the same goes for foisting their political opinions on official time.

Tim Bakken is likely not long for future employment at West Point. It's drivel like this that will get him fired:



Bakken sees himself as a whistle blower / knight in shining armor exposing the Army and West Point for being a hidebound institution. He's just another iconoclast who doesn't get the US military as an institution.
 
He's really got no case. West Point is a US Army base and follows the UCMJ in regard to all military personnel there. The civilian staff and instructors are employees of the US Army and government. They don't get to teach whatever-the-fuck they want, and the same goes for foisting their political opinions on official time.

Tim Bakken is likely not long for future employment at West Point. It's drivel like this that will get him fired:



Bakken sees himself as a whistle blower / knight in shining armor exposing the Army and West Point for being a hidebound institution. He's just another iconoclast who doesn't get the US military as an institution.
No surprise you oppose academic freedom.
 
No surprise you oppose academic freedom.
It isn't "academic freedom." West Point is not some public or private university, and its values reflect the needs and expectations of the US Army, not society as a whole. It is not a reflection of society, nor is it some place where you conduct social experiments. That is what Bakken complains about. He's the one that doesn't get it. West Point doesn't do "academic freedom." It does officer training to make Army leaders within the expectations of that service.

If Bakken wants academic freedom, he should resign his position and go to a university that does that.
 
It isn't "academic freedom." West Point is not some public or private university, and its values reflect the needs and expectations of the US Army, not society as a whole. It is not a reflection of society, nor is it some place where you conduct social experiments. That is what Bakken complains about. He's the one that doesn't get it. West Point doesn't do "academic freedom." It does officer training to make Army leaders within the expectations of that service.

If Bakken wants academic freedom, he should resign his position and go to a university that does that.
Again, no surprise you hate education.
 
“As a professor of law, Plaintiff’s inability to express opinions on the subject matter being taught is stifling and disruptive to the educational process,” the lawsuit said. It added that he no longer would be able to express to students whether a major or dissenting opinion is persuasive and why.
 
Again, no surprise you hate education.
You don't get it. West Point is a military academy not a public or private university. It has a specific purpose and a specific curriculum tailored to that end. Instructors don't get to foist their personal opinions. That's how it works.
 
“As a professor of law, Plaintiff’s inability to express opinions on the subject matter being taught is stifling and disruptive to the educational process,” the lawsuit said. It added that he no longer would be able to express to students whether a major or dissenting opinion is persuasive and why.
Bakken doesn't get to foist his personal opinions while teaching at West Point. That's how it is. That's how the military works.
 
Nothing to do with topic of the thread.
It has everything to do with it. West Point isn't trying to turn out deep thinking 'well rounded' college graduates. It is trying to turn out effective military officers. One of the things it doesn't need to do that is pointless philosophical debates about ephemeral nonsense. You don't get to foist your opinion freely in the military. You do as ordered. That's how it works.
 
No idea what you wrote.
A 'Ring knocker' is someone who graduated from a US military academy.

ring knocker​


ring knocker​

n. Slang
A commissioned nonreservist officer in the US armed forces who is a graduate of one of the three US military academies, especially West Point.

5 reasons why troops can’t stand ring-knocking lieutenants​


I was at one point when on the USS Enterprise, a 'separatee' from one such ring knocker for watch standing. The MPA, Electrical Officer, and Engineer couldn't dispute my position with regard to this JO, and their solution was to simply make sure we were never to be on the watch bill at the same time.
 
Bakken's lawsuit alleges that West Point issued an "Academic Engagement Policy" on February 13 which requires faculty to get prior approval before speaking publicly or publishing in an official capacity.

When Bakken argued it was unconstitutional, a deputy department head "turned red, pounded the table, and admonished that (Bakken) must obey the regulation," according to the complaint.

 
Back
Top