I got banned at a forum with the word "debate" in the title of it for speaking the truths I will tell you. (I wonder if I will get Kimmeled here) It all started out with discussing the assassination of Charlie Kirk, whom the right wing media is trying to deify. And the cancellation of the Jimmy Kimmel show for political reasons. But what happened to Brian Kilmeade or Fox News for him saying that the U.S. should just kill the mentally ill homeless? Not a god damned thing! And for the vast majority of the homeless who are mentally ill, the reason they are mentally ill is because they are homeless!
All this brings me to the point of this thread. Assassination, genocide and violence. As for the assassination of Charlie Kirk that the right wing is crying about, he was just one person. They say that the cuts Trump has planned for Medicaid alone will cause the deaths of an estimated 16,624 Americans per year. That is GENOCIDE! When people die from deaths that are easily preventable, you would be correct in calling it MURDER! It is VIOLENCE! Those people are just as dead as somebody like Kirk who got shot in the neck. Except in Kirk's case, his death was a lot quicker and more merciful than the deaths that those 16,624 people per year will suffer.
Now the reason that other forum banned me for bringing this up is because they say that they have zero tolerance for violent rhetoric. But before the thread in which I brought the subject up, though they accused me of it, I didn't state any "violent rhetoric." There is only one thing that I can think of that caused them to ban me over that particular thread. It is this inescapable logic. If somebody commits any sort of violent act against you, you are right in doing the same against them. Partially because it is probably an instinctual thing that we can't escape, but because it would morally be the right thing to do. So when you have Murder, Genocide and Violence being used against you, you can't be called wrong in dishing the same thing out.
All this brings me to the point of this thread. Assassination, genocide and violence. As for the assassination of Charlie Kirk that the right wing is crying about, he was just one person. They say that the cuts Trump has planned for Medicaid alone will cause the deaths of an estimated 16,624 Americans per year. That is GENOCIDE! When people die from deaths that are easily preventable, you would be correct in calling it MURDER! It is VIOLENCE! Those people are just as dead as somebody like Kirk who got shot in the neck. Except in Kirk's case, his death was a lot quicker and more merciful than the deaths that those 16,624 people per year will suffer.
Now the reason that other forum banned me for bringing this up is because they say that they have zero tolerance for violent rhetoric. But before the thread in which I brought the subject up, though they accused me of it, I didn't state any "violent rhetoric." There is only one thing that I can think of that caused them to ban me over that particular thread. It is this inescapable logic. If somebody commits any sort of violent act against you, you are right in doing the same against them. Partially because it is probably an instinctual thing that we can't escape, but because it would morally be the right thing to do. So when you have Murder, Genocide and Violence being used against you, you can't be called wrong in dishing the same thing out.
