Remember when Roseanne Barr was cancelled for a Tweet

Jarod said:
The federal government does not have a right to control what political messages are shared on public airways.

How big of an idiot are you?

Private airways can limit free speech, government cannot manage speech on public airways.

I am allowed to limit speech on my own private property, I am not the government.

Do you understand the difference between government action, and private citizen action?
Click to expand...
Have someone read this and explain it:

They are not private airwaves, dummy, they are public airwaves and the FCC is authorized to control them.

Kimmel is free to say any lie he pleases, just not on the FCC controlled public airwaves.

The FCC, decades ago, controlled age inappropriate shows until after 10PM. They controlled the content as to when it could be aired and can still do so. They can stop porn on the public airways now.

You are showing an abundance of ignorance.

It's not unexpected from a receptionist.
 
Last edited:
Earl said:
Have someone read this and explain it:

They are not private airwaves, dummy, they are public airwaves and the FCC is authorized to control them.

Kimmel is free to say any lie he pleases, just not on the FCC controlled public airwaves.

The FCC, decades ago, controlled age inappropriate shows until after 10PM. They controlled the content as to when it could be aired and can still do so. They can s\top porn on \the public airways now.

You are showing an abundance of ignorance.

It's not unexpected from a receptionist.
Click to expand...
The government is not allowed to manage speech on public property. Do you understand that?

If you do not understand that you are seriously uneducated.

Sidewalks, and public parks are owned by the government, the government cannot suppress speech on them.
 
Jarod said:
The government is not allowed to manage speech on public property. Do you understand that?

If you do not understand that you are seriously uneducated.

Sidewalks, and public parks are owned by the government, the government cannot suppress speech on them.
Click to expand...
The FCC can control the content on the public airwaves. Radio Frequency (RF) electromagnetic waves are not sidewalks or public parks.

Read the law or have someone read it and explain it. IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST...that includes porn.
 
The FCC and Free Speech

The Federal Communications Commission is an executive branch agency that regulates over-the-air broadcast television, radio stations, and other platforms. In its published guidelines, the FCC says that Section 326 of the Communications Act of 1934 greatly restricts its ability to limit free speech on terrestrial stations. The act says that “no regulation or condition shall be promulgated or fixed by the [Commission] which shall interfere with the right of free speech by means of [over-the-air] broadcast communication.” The FCC can regulate some types of speech, such as indecency, obscenity, sponsorship identification, conduct of on-air contests, and hoaxes.

What the Constitution Says About Free Speech on the Airwaves | Constitution Center

Recent comments from television comedian Jimmy Kimmel and his show’s suspension on ABC have brought attention to a First Amendment debate about freedom of speech on broadcast television stations.
constitutioncenter.org
 
Earl said:
The FCC can control the content on the public airwaves. Radio Frequency (RF) electromagnetic waves are not sidewalks or public parks.

Read the law or have someone read it and explain it. IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST...that includes porn.
Click to expand...
They cannot control speech on the public airways. If they could, the Democrats would shut down Fox, and the Republicans would shut down NBC.

if what you were saying is the case, there would be zero free speech. The government could control speech where own property, and private citizens can control where they own property.

Where would the first amendment apply?

If you can’t understand that, you lack a basic knowledge of America. No wonder you’re a Trumper.
 
To understand the 1934 FCC congressional mandate, consider these key points:

Established the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to ***(regulate interstate and international communications.***(Asterisks are mine)
Aimed to promote the availability of communication services to all Americans.
Addressed issues of radio frequency interference and licensing for broadcasters.
Sought to ensure fair competition and prevent monopolies in the communications industry.
Mandated the allocation of radio frequencies to prevent overcrowding and improve service quality.
Laid the groundwork for future telecommunications regulations and policies
Jarod said:
They cannot control speech on the public airways. If they could, the Democrats would shut down Fox, and the Republicans would shut down NBC.

if what you were saying is the case, there would be zero free speech. The government could control speech where own property, and private citizens can control where they own property.

Where would the first amendment apply?

If you can’t understand that, you lack a basic knowledge of America. No wonder you’re a Trumper.
Click to expand...
Have someone explain the "In the public interest."

The FCC can regulate content and timing on any TV show using the public airwaves.

They just did with the liar, Kimmel.
 
Earl said:
To understand the 1934 FCC congressional mandate, consider these key points:

Established the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to ***(regulate interstate and international communications.***(Asterisks are mine)
Aimed to promote the availability of communication services to all Americans.
Addressed issues of radio frequency interference and licensing for broadcasters.
Sought to ensure fair competition and prevent monopolies in the communications industry.
Mandated the allocation of radio frequencies to prevent overcrowding and improve service quality.
Laid the groundwork for future telecommunications regulations and policies
Have someone explain the "In the public interest."

The FCC can regulate content and timing on any TV show using the public airwaves.

They just did with the liar, Kimmel.
Click to expand...
Do you understand that the constitution supersedes laws passed by Congress?
 
Lionfish said:
The FCC and Free Speech

The Federal Communications Commission is an executive branch agency that regulates over-the-air broadcast television, radio stations, and other platforms. In its published guidelines, the FCC says that Section 326 of the Communications Act of 1934 greatly restricts its ability to limit free speech on terrestrial stations. The act says that “no regulation or condition shall be promulgated or fixed by the [Commission] which shall interfere with the right of free speech by means of [over-the-air] broadcast communication.” The FCC can regulate some types of speech, such as indecency, obscenity, sponsorship identification, conduct of on-air contests, and hoaxes.

What the Constitution Says About Free Speech on the Airwaves | Constitution Center

Recent comments from television comedian Jimmy Kimmel and his show’s suspension on ABC have brought attention to a First Amendment debate about freedom of speech on broadcast television stations.
constitutioncenter.org
Click to expand...
I believe that "hoaxes" would apply to Kimmel's lie.
 
Jarod said:
Do you understand that the constitution supersedes laws passed by Congress
Click to expand...

Earl said:
To understand the 1934 FCC congressional mandate, consider these key points:

Established the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to ***(regulate interstate and international communications.***(Asterisks are mine)
Aimed to promote the availability of communication services to all Americans.
Addressed issues of radio frequency interference and licensing for broadcasters.
Sought to ensure fair competition and prevent monopolies in the communications industry.
Mandated the allocation of radio frequencies to prevent overcrowding and improve service quality.
Laid the groundwork for future telecommunications regulations and policies
Have someone explain the "In the public interest."

The FCC can regulate content and timing on any TV show using the public airwaves.

They just did with the liar, Kimmel.
Click to expand...
PCC can regulate content to a very small degree. They can require educational programming, however they cannot manage the message. They can regulate timing, but not to prevent political speech.

I think you do not understand complex issues like this. You take a very simplistic view of a complex issue. I think you should start by reading the first amendment and realizing that the constitution supersedes any law passed by Congress.
 
Jarod said:
PCC can regulate content to a very small degree. They can require educational programming, however they cannot manage the message. They can regulate timing, but not to prevent political speech.

I think you do not understand complex issues like this. You take a very simplistic view of a complex issue. I think you should start by reading the first amendment and realizing that the constitution supersedes any law passed by Congress.
Click to expand...
Post a case where the FCC has been restrained by a court case that challenged its mandate.

Your complex issues are making you look foolish.

It's the "FCC" not the PCC.

Do try to keep up with these "complex issues."
 
Earl said:
Post a case where the FCC has been restrained by a court case that challenged its mandate.

Your complex issues are making you look foolish.

It's the "FCC" not the PCC.

Do try to keep up with these "complex issues."
Click to expand...
You are incredibly uneducated.
 
Jarod said:
You are incredibly uneducated.
Click to expand...
So, you can not post a case where the FCC mandate has been successfully challenged.

You could have just said so.

Oh those pesky complex issues...that you have no clue about.

I know how to spell "FCC" correctly.

And I know how to do a Star and Delta formations of Resistances

"In this section we will understand what are star and delta formations of resistances and also try to identify them in simple circuits.

Star and delta formations of resistances is a standard 3-phase circuit or network of resistances connected in the same way as their name suggests.

Star formation of resistances looks like this:

Delta formation of resistances looks like this:

The key to solving problems is to identify them in a simple circuit.
Delta to Star transformation

In this section we will convert Delta formation of resistances to Star formation resistances.

Here is the formula for transformation-

R12=R1.R2R1+R2+R3R12=R1+R2+R3R1.R2

Note that the above formula is cyclic in nature hence it works the same for R23R23 and R31R31.

Show that R12=R1.R2R1+R2+R3R12=R1+R2+R3R1.R2

Lets consider the resistance from AA to CC:

RAC,left=R2RAC,left=R2 in parallel with R1+R3R1+R3
RAC,left=R2(R1+R3)R2+R1+R3RAC,left=R2+R1+R3R2(R1+R3)
RAC,right=R12+R23RAC,right=R12+R23

Equating the two:

R2(R1+R3)R2+R1+R3=R12+R23R2+R1+R3R2(R1+R3)=R12+R23

Similarly:

R3(R2+R1)R3+R2+R1=R23+R31R3+R2+R1R3(R2+R1)=R23+R31
R1(R3+R2)R1+R3+R2=R31+R12R1+R3+R2R1(R3+R2)=R31+R12

Adding the first two equations, and subtracting the middle equation gives:

(R31+R12)+(R12+R23)−(R23+R31)=R1(R3+R2)R1+R3+R2+R2(R1+R3)R2+R1+R3−R3(R2+R1)R3+R2+R1(R31+R12)+(R12+R23)−(R23+R31)=R1+R3+R2R1(R3+R2)+R2+R1+R3R2(R1+R3)−R3+R2+R1R3(R2+R1)

2R12=2R1R2R1+R2+R32R12=R1+R2+R32R1R2

R12=R1R2R1+R2+R3R12=R1+R2+R3R1R2

Star to Delta transformation

In this section we will convert Star formation of resistances to Delta formation resistances.

We will do this by finding equivalent resitances in place of resistances given in the problem.

For example,

In order to replace R1R1 and R2R2 (See Star formation) in the given diagram we will be there equivalent, that is R12R12 (See Delta formation).

Here is the formula for transformation-

R12=R1+R2+R1.R2R3R12=R1+R2+R3R1.R2

Note that the above formula is cyclic in nature hence it works the same for R23R23 and R31R31.

Prove that R12=R1+R2+R1.R2R3R12=R1+R2+R3R1.R2

This is the same setup as in the previous setup, with the resistors renamed as follows:

R1→R23R1→R23
R2→R13R2→R13
R3→R12R3→R12
R23→R1R23→R1
R13→R2R13→R2
R12→R3R12→R3

So, the general results of the above proof become:

R3=R23R13R1+R13+R12R3=R1+R13+R12R23R13

And similarly:

R1=R13R12R1+R12+R23R1=R1+R12+R23R13R12 R2=R12R23R1+R23+R13R2=R1+R23+R13R12R23

So,

R1+R2+R1R2R12=R12(R23+R13)R23+R13+R12+R13R12R23R12R23R13R1+R2+R12R1R2=R23+R13+R12R12(R23+R13)+R23R13R13R12R23R12

R1+R2+R1R2R12=R12(R23+R13+R12)R23+R13+R12R1+R2+R12R1R2=R23+R13+R12R12(R23+R13+R12)

R1+R2+R1R2R12=R12R1+R2+R12R1R2=R12

QED

Find the equivalent resistance in the given circuit diagram (in terms of RR)-

In order to solve this question, we will transform the circuit and apply the formula side by side-

Notice the highlighted area in the circuit, and then observe the change. Can you identify this transformation (Is it Star-to-Delta or Delta-to-Star)?

Next we will do the same to the other side of the circuit. It will look like this-

Now observe-

Congratulations! We have transformed a complex looking circuit into a simple circuit we can easily solve.

Wasn't that easy? Note that the method shown in this example is not the only way to solve the question. Try transforming other points, make your own way.

Overall answer to the question is 2R332R.



Find the resistance between A and B if each resistor measures 1Ω.Ω.

Question section (Intermediate)

Determine the resistance in ohms between the points A and B (equivalent resistance) of the circuit shown below. All the values of the resistances are given in ohms.

Above shows an arrangement of resistors. Each resistor has a resistance of 1 ohm. Calculate the equivalent resistance of the arrangement

Question section (Advanced)

If the equivalent resistance between points AA and BB of the circuit above is ReqReq in ohms, find ⌊103Req⌋⌊103Req⌋.

In the figure below, all resistors have resistance R=1 ΩR=1 Ω. Find the equivalent resistance in Ohms between the points A and O.


How's that for complexity? It's really not though it's taught in first year college "EE."
 
Last edited:
Earl said:
So, you can not post a case where the FCC mandate has been successfully challenged.

You could have just said so.

Oh those pesky complex issues...that you have no clue about.

I know how to spell "FCC" correctly.
Click to expand...
I haven’t even looked, but I don’t care just because it has not been successfully challenged does not mean it’s constitutional.

Very likely is the fact that the FCC has always been careful not to violate the first amendment. Therefore there would be no successful challenge.
 
Earl said:
So, you can not post a case where the FCC mandate has been successfully challenged.

You could have just said so.

Oh those pesky complex issues...that you have no clue about.

I know how to spell "FCC" correctly.
Click to expand...
If you are going to discuss these issues, you should educate yourself. It’s really not that hard, but you show your ignorance almost every time you open your mouth.
 
Kimmel's First Amendment rights have not been violated. He is free to say any lies he pleases, just not on the airwaves regulated by the FCC.
 
Jarod said:
If you are going to discuss these issues, you should educate yourself. It’s really not that hard, but you show your ignorance almost every time you open your mouth.
Click to expand...
So, you can not post a case where the FCC mandate has been successfully challenged.

You could have just said so.

Oh those pesky complex issues...that you have no clue about.

I know how to spell "FCC" correctly.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top