Into the Night
Verified User
Roll em dice!
Roll them dice!Roll em dice!
Roll em dice!
Roll them dice!Roll em dice!
Roll em dice!Roll them dice!
Nope. You do not. You read it. You saw that it was totally straightforward ... and you immediately feared for your killing supremacy. If women are not allowed to kill living humans with impunity, something that would land me in jail, you will join them in screaming "VICTIMHOOD!".The first, more minor issue, is that I have some doubts as to whether your definition is totally normal.
Incorrect. This is a dishonest pivot on your part. I didn't disagree with any definition; I rejected Wikipedia outright for the nonauthoritative source that it is. I did make this perfectly clear.For one, you seem to disagree with Wikipedia's definition of contract killings
Sorry, you have no wiggle room. It is not merely my conclusion but a mathematical theorem. You approve of a subset of contract killings, ergo there are some contract killings of which you approve, and therefore you cannot claim to disapprove of the entire superset of contract killings.The second more important issue is that you jumped to the conclusion that I approve of contract killings. I never said that.
You thought this because you can't read, remember?I thought you said you didn't mention abortion?
And yet you said you made no mention of abortion.Nope. You do not. You read it. You saw that it was totally straightforward ... and you immediately feared for your killing supremacy. If women are not allowed to kill living humans with impunity, something that would land me in jail, you will join them in screaming "VICTIMHOOD!".
That is what is going on here. You are clinging to your killing supremacy with a death-grip. Beyond that, you have absolutely no qualms with my definition.
Incorrect. This is a dishonest pivot on your part. I didn't disagree with any definition; I rejected Wikipedia outright for the nonauthoritative source that it is. I did make this perfectly clear.
Anyway, we don't need to buy time by quibbling over definitions because I gave you a perfectly good one for which you have no objections.
Sorry, you have no wiggle room. It is not merely my conclusion but a mathematical theorem. You approve of a subset of contract killings, ergo there are some contract killings of which you approve, and therefore you cannot claim to disapprove of the entire superset of contract killings.
If you can't follow the logic, that is your personal issue. As it stands now, you approve of contract killings. The day you disapprove of the superset of contract killings, you are going to have to reject all abortions. Again, you have no wiggle room.
If only you could read, this would be so much easier.And yet you said you made no mention of abortion.
Here you are talking about abortion.
Did you say you had not made any mention of abortion?If only you could read, this would be so much easier.
I did not.Did you say you had not made any mention of abortion?
Nope. Contract Killing is the superset.Your straw man of "contract killing" obviously was in reference to abortion.
If only you could read, you would have been able to see that "murder" was not part of the definition I presented. Reading is so very important."Contract killing" is murder
So why talk about abortion now? Forgetting what you said?I did not.
Your silly copy and pasting and reference to math doesn't help.Nope. Contract Killing is the superset.
Then "contract killing" isn't murder? You contradicted yourself.If only you could read, you would have been able to see that "murder" was not part of the definition I presented. Reading is so very important.
If you could read, you'd know that I wish to talk about "contract killing".So why talk about abortion now?
Yes, that's exactly what being a proper subset means. If only you understood math you'd understand this. Man, your deaf studies really did a number on you.Abortion is not a contract killing.
You did. And you have yet to provide examples of @Scott thinking it's OK.If you could read, you'd know that I wish to talk about "contract killing".
All you did was copying and pasting without understanding.Yes, that's exactly what being a proper subset means. If only you understood math you'd understand this. Man, your deaf studies really did a number on you.
Your silly copy and pasting and reference to math doesn't help.
Abortion is not a contract killing.
What contradiction and bad math? Are you seeing things that aren't there? I feel sorry for you.Contradiction and Bad Math. You were deprived of an education. I feel sorry for you.
You wouldn't have to ask if you actually understood math and logic.What contradiction and bad math?
So you have no idea.You wouldn't have to ask if you actually understood math and logic.
Poor grammar. You should have written: "All you did was copy-paste without understanding."All you did was copying and pasting without understanding.
Bad logic. If you had actually learned logic, you wouldn't be making one long chain of errors.So you have no idea.