A much more accurate poll.

[USFREEDOM911]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_access_poll
Sampling bias - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Again, I guarantee if you asked the question of whether you support or oppose the Az law with a representative sample, a very large number (maybe a plurality) would say they were unsure. That is because many don't know what is in the law and others don't have a strong opinion.

If the poll does not ask you demographic questions (e.g., race, age, household income etc.) with which they may cull the sample, then the poll is fairly worthless as a representation of actual public opinion.

There is no point in going to extreme efforts to try to prevent cheating in such polls, since they are not meant to be scientific anyway. Requiring a unique IP is pretty easy, but will not even begin to prevent a determined cheater.

I am sorry you are so ignorant and have failed to understand this, though I have repeated it all several times and in different ways to try to get the point across. But you should probably take some perspective from the fact that even those who share your bias (which seems to be in the majority here) have not posted agreement with your stupid position. They don't want

After all the controversy SB 1070 has caused, why do you feel that people don't have a strong opinion about this??

 

[Timshel]

After all the controversy SB 1070 has caused, why do you feel that people don't have a strong opinion about this??

Uhhh, because many don't really care or have mixed feelings on the subject. As I mentioned, many who would answer unsure don't know what the law is.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Uhhh, because many don't really care or have mixed feelings on the subject. As I mentioned, many who would answer unsure don't know what the law is.

How can you draw the conclusion that the majority would be unsure, because they don't know what the law says, when this has been in the news nationwide??

 

[Timshel]

How can you draw the conclusion that the majority would be unsure, because they don't know what the law says, when this has been in the news nationwide??

I said, I would GUARANTEE (i.e. bet or stake something on this outcome) that unsure receives a LARGE NUMBER of votes, possibly a PLURALITY. From that you read that I have CONCLUDED that a MAJORITY would answer unsure.

I think I see why you are failing to comprehend. It's like playing that game where you pass down a statement through several people and it comes back all distorted. You took about six steps in one, though.

What news report included full text of the bill? I am sure you listened intently to Fox/Rush to tell you what the bill said. Not everyone shares your inability for critical thinking and others tune out such news, because they just don't care.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

I said, I would GUARANTEE (i.e. bet or stake something on this outcome) that unsure receives a LARGE NUMBER of votes, possibly a PLURALITY. From that you read that I have CONCLUDED that a MAJORITY would answer unsure.

I think I see why you are failing to comprehend. It's like playing that game where you pass down a statement through several people and it comes back all distorted. You took about six steps in one, though.

What news report included full text of the bill? I am sure you listened intently to Fox/Rush to tell you what the bill said. Not everyone shares your inability for critical thinking and others tune out such news, because they just don't care.

Where this fails is your desire to hope that people don't know anything about the bill; because that way you can continue to throw out assertions and accusations, while hoping that you can convince enough to believe what you want them to believe.

You're nothing but a fucking hack that wants to make sure that the US is less then the other major powers in the world and you've shown this by your pitiful whining about changiing the immigration policies and allowing anyone in.
Well, at least you put in the disclaimer about criminals; because that way it makes it look like you really care.

You're reasoning ability is so pathetic; that you actually think that the US infrastructure can absorb an unlimited number of immigrants, who have no housing, jobs, etc set up to support them.

From reading your hubris; it's apparent that you really don't care about immigrants and instead just want them here so you'll feel better, while you treat them as peons.

You've further more shown your stupidity; by trying to make sure that you can continue to try and make this about "race", instead of it being a societal isssue.

I guess those people in other states, that are drafting similar laws, are racist also.

Take your faux-outrage, shine it up real good, turn it sideways, and shove it up your ass.
At least that way, your lies will only affect you and not those around you.

You're a joke and a pathetic one at that.

Now go ahead and crank up your hypocritical outrage and respond with more of your blubbering.