QP!
Verified User
yes you simpleton.This was a quote from an earlier post of yours (I won't correct the poor English): "The signature also seems to be undeniable his even though that is irrelevant to the lawsuit."
It was after I asked this question if this was IT. A simple answer of yes or no would have sufficed, but you changed your position and blamed me for not noticing, but I did.
No, you poorly educated twits never do make any sense.
Two things can be true at once. I can believe the signature seems to be his but ALSO that there is nothing in the epstein file that would point to his guilt.
So for you to ask me 'is this it' when my position is there is nothing here, your 'it' makes no sense. It would only make sense if i was suggesting this is something that might get Trump.
RB you simply are so dumb you do not understand how people have correctly used 'is this it' over the years.
Example 1 : Proper use...
Person : oh Trump is in trouble. He was just accused of X
Magat : oh so is this it?
Example 2 : Stupid use...
Person 1 : Trump is accused of something but this is a nothing burger
RB Magat : oh so is this it
In example 1 the intent of saying 'is this it' is to mock the person getting hopes up this might catch Trump when he has escaped so many other accusations.
When you say it, RB, as you do when the person has no such belief it is meaningless. It mocks nothing.