So the panty wetting crybaby who has nothing to offer but ad hominem laced temper tantrums, is accusing me of being
"intellectually impotent and willfully ignorant regarding political/social discussions."
Go look in the mirror, panty boy.
You can sob and wail and call it anything you want to, those two were only in the race to increase their status and name recognition at the expense of siphoning off votes from the real candidates who actually had a chance to win.
In the 2,000 election, Pat Buchanan's presence actually contributed to handing the state of Florida and ultimately the White House to GW Bush.
https://i.postimg.cc/SNxpkhQh/Screenshot-20250906-094802.jpg
That

is a prime reason for not giving third party outsiders too much of an opportunity to distract voters from the actual contenders.
Bernie ran in the primaries. He lost. Being included in the debates would not have changed that.
Dry your eyes, wipe your nose and change your diaper.
Boo.
Fucking.
Hoo.
So some snarky comments were made about Sanders in some private emails
Big.
Fucking.
Deal.
That does not = "rigged primaries" and the courts reasoning in throwing out his sore loser lawsuit is not proof otherwise.
Opinion piece.
BFD.
Medicare for All, the Green New Deal, a $15 minimum wage, expanding the estate tax, limiting the size of banks, and tuition-free college.
Not one of which had snowball's chance in hell of ever becoming law without a 2/3
filibuster proof majority in the US Senate.
And if Unc'a Bernie was so popular, why did Hillary mop the floor with his ass in the primaries?
I don't know what point you're attempting to make or what issue you're trying to address with #6 but then, I kind of doubt that you do either.
In the future, try not to act like such an emotional diva and drama queen.
You're the kind liberal that gives the left a bad name with your raging, snotty bitch queen debate style.