Virginia Giuffre's tell all memoir to be published on Oct 21st, detailing her time with Epstein and his "many friends"

The hoax is Democrats insisting that Trump is involved with zero evidence to back it up.
I still find it hilarious that you would claim that trump was not involved. The evidence is overwhelming that he was involved.

We cannot prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was criminally involved, maybe he was just unbelievably incompetent, but he was definitely involved.

You know who was not involved? Any major Democrat.
 
I'm being ignored?
I didn't say I was ignoring you.

Weird just saw you quote me again with another 12B. LOL
You are the 12B violator, as far as I can tell. Let's ask @Damocles directly.

1. You know that the "Epstein file" is full of hundreds of child-porn videos as stated in this video:
View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/_cZlkuaS5FM?feature=share


2. Knowing this, you demand that they all be released to the public, i.e.
There are hundreds of Epstein files. Release them all.

So, the question for @Damocles is "Should I be reporting this as a 12B violation?"
 
I still find it hilarious that you would claim that trump was not involved.
I still find it hilarious that you insist that trump is somehow involved. Explain to me how I can verify exactly what you believe. Are you referring to Trump's banning of Epstein from Mar-A-Largo? That doesn't make him "involved" in any of Epstein's business.

I'm still waiting for you to say that you still find it hilarious that I would claim that the S&P 500 will somehow be above 5,000 in 37 days. You and "evidence" don't exactly go together.

The evidence is overwhelming that he was involved.
Lay all this overwhelming evidence on me. The S&P 500 closed out today at 6,465.73, by the way.

We cannot prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was criminally involved,
Correct. In fact, you cannot prove to any convincing degree that Trump had anything to do with Epstein. Check you ZERO evidence of anything.

maybe he was just unbelievably incompetent, but he was definitely involved.
Trump is totally competent (he is making America great again) and there is no reason anyone should believe that Trump was somehow involved in Epstein. Check your ZERO evidence of anything.

You know who was not involved? Any major Democrat.
Explain how you know this. How will it all change when the Grand Jury testimony is unsealed and released?
 
I can read.
I don't believe you.

Her post is clear.
You wouldn't know. You can't read. You don't know what words mean.

There was no demand for child porn to be released.
She very clearly demanded that the hundreds of Epstein files be released. Her post was clear. She is well aware that those hundreds of files are kiddie porn videos. She's just a continuous 12B violation from the looks of it.
 
I don't believe you.


You wouldn't know. You can't read. You don't know what words mean.


She very clearly demanded that the hundreds of Epstein files be released. Her post was clear. She is well aware that those hundreds of files are kiddie porn videos. She's just a continuous 12B violation from the looks of it.
Again, she did not ask for child porn to be released. Only the files with information implicating people.
 
Knew it how?
I informed her. I also reposted the Pam Bondi clip, but I told her several times previously.

I'd like to make a correction. The "hundreds" of files are actually "tens of thousands" of files.

How do you know it's *all* child porn?
Bondi: "To the tens of thousands of video, they turned out to be child porn downloaded by that disgusting Jeffrey Epstein."

 
I informed her. I also reposted the Pam Bondi clip, but I told her several times previously.

I'd like to make a correction. The "hundreds" of files are actually "tens of thousands" of files.


Bondi: "To the tens of thousands of video, they turned out to be child porn downloaded by that disgusting Jeffrey Epstein."

Assuming she is to be believed, those are not files. Only downloads.
 
Back
Top