This isn't a locker room. But since the guys on here treat it as such then they ought not to act like shocked pussies when a woman talks shit back at them.
Again, that might make sense except for the fact that your fellow retard, damnyankeeman, is constantly bringing up the subject by asking for this information from others. Apparently, he hopes to use it as an ad hom. That is, he asks for others to disclose information. His reasoning seems to be that if the person denies participation in the act then he has established the behavior is abnormal and if they admit to the act he can dismiss them as perverts. Neither conclusion is warranted, though.
What is funny here, is that he is the deviant on BJs.
It seems obvious to me that posters such as soc have used these invasive questions to have some fun with him and may imagine that he is shocked by the response. I don't know if he is shocked or if he gets a weird thrill out of it, but it is obvious that he is inviting and encouraging the discussion. He should not ask questions to which he does not wish to hear the response. If you are offended by the responses then maybe you should request that he not ask such stupid questions.
You wanted to pipe in about my brothers in an irrelevent and crude manner to the discussion I merely made an equally crude and irrelevent come-back.
You are an incredible hypocrite and a complete idiot. How was my question any more crude than those asked by damnyankeeman? The fact is, that it was not my question, but simply a repetition of his. The point of which was to show why a soldier might take offense at having the honor of his service called into question based on whether he likes BJs.
Because I was simply applying his criteria for determining the fitness of a soldier, it was obviously not irrelevant either.
There is no way that the question of whether one likes a bj, whether it came from me or damnyankeeman, was as crude as your response. I don't know what sort of math you are doing, but you have definitely made an error in that calculation. No worries, I don't really care much.
It is strange that you simultaneously seem to hold that your brothers are above such questions (to the point where you erupt into an irrational outburst and insult your own brothers) of whether they like BJs while you support questions of a much more sensitive nature as being a basis for determining the fitness of a soldier. Again, your buddy thinks the BJ question itself is important.
