Study Finds a Chilling Link Between Personality Type and Trump Support — Malevolent traits and reduced empathy go hand in hand.

I just spent the last 20 minutes looking at Neumann and Tarita on google sites, and there is no political information about either of them. Also, Neumann is a psych doctor who's specialized in psychopathy for decades. Which of these do you have a problem with, identifying psychopaths, psychology or both?
False authority fallacy. Psychoquackery gets you nowhere.
 
He's better off on ignore. Even before the ability was removed, I never got curious and took him off ignore. I got enough fill before he was put on ignore to last me. I'm pretty sure he has socks, too.
@Dutch Uncle thinks he's like 3 or 4 other accounts: Into the Night and gfm7175 and IBDaMann and maybe something(s) else. I don't know myself. I've had all those accounts on Ignore for a very long time, so I don't analyze their similarities. My life is just better never seeing anything they shit into the internet.
 
How many of us have to prove you wrong how many times before you finally shut the fuck up?

Maybe you should read through this thread before re-posting that shit academic article.

My bet is Neumann's 'Structural Equation Modeling' (SEM), which really doesn't involve much in the way of equations, looked something like this:

crazy-conspiracy-theory-map-guy-meme-2.jpg


And it coalesced into a Pygmalion outcome peppered heavily with irrelevant drivel in between. I also find his use of circular referencing in the bibliography to be humorous. Normally, one doesn't quote their own work in a bibliography, but Neumann does.
 
@Dutch Uncle thinks he's like 3 or 4 other accounts: Into the Night and gfm7175 and IBDaMann and maybe something(s) else. I don't know myself. I've had all those accounts on Ignore for a very long time, so I don't analyze their similarities. My life is just better never seeing anything they shit into the internet.
He's pretty easy to spot. His fake forum is here: https://politiplex.freeforums.net/

Notice the "moderators".
 
Here's his CV


His earlier work is mostly done on offenders in the criminal justice system with regard to psychopathic behavior. Starting with 119, he becomes increasingly political as 133, 142, and 164 demonstrate (numbers from his CV list).

As an academic, his student love him for being engaging and an "Easy A." That is, his classes are shallow and easily passed.


A review of his writing style. I'm not impressed by it myself.

You picked three out of 164 and claim they're political so that nullifies his work? All those numbers show is the title of his papers, not the content, so there's no way to read his conclusions. I think you're grasping at straws because you're conservative and support trump. His gradings by students are irrelevant. The man's a teacher and a scholar with advanced degrees and a solid body of work. You just don't agree with it.

Btw I read the bolded words in your second link and there's absolutely nothing wrong with his writing.
 
Here's his CV


His earlier work is mostly done on offenders in the criminal justice system with regard to psychopathic behavior. Starting with 119, he becomes increasingly political as 133, 142, and 164 demonstrate (numbers from his CV list).

As an academic, his student love him for being engaging and an "Easy A." That is, his classes are shallow and easily passed.


A review of his writing style. I'm not impressed by it myself.

What part of that site led you to conclude that the author is, in your words, a "radical Leftist"?
 
Maybe you should read through this thread before re-posting that shit academic article.

My bet is Neumann's 'Structural Equation Modeling' (SEM), which really doesn't involve much in the way of equations, looked something like this:

crazy-conspiracy-theory-map-guy-meme-2.jpg


And it coalesced into a Pygmalion outcome peppered heavily with irrelevant drivel in between. I also find his use of circular referencing in the bibliography to be humorous. Normally, one doesn't quote their own work in a bibliography, but Neumann does.
You're not seriously pretending that MAGAts are not malevolent, violent, narcissistic, uneducated, unthoughtful people, are you? You're having a fucking stroke about a single professor who knows more about the subject than you do while you completely try to avoid his correct conclusion. The cult is dangerous and it is very much real. Continue to disregard reality at your own peril.
 
You picked three out of 164 and claim they're political so that nullifies his work? All those numbers show is the title of his papers, not the content, so there's no way to read his conclusions. I think you're grasping at straws because you're conservative and support trump. His gradings by students are irrelevant. The man's a teacher and a scholar with advanced degrees and a solid body of work. You just don't agree with it.

Btw I read the bolded words in your second link and there's absolutely nothing wrong with his writing.
I picked four that show his political bias. I'm not claiming he was politically biased in all of his work, only that he is politically biased and that effects his work when he is doing something that's politically related.
 
Let me guess, they dared disagree with trump?
I'll give him due credit that he's one of the, like, three MAGAts on JPP who can write a sentence, but he's completely fucking gone-zo. Anything he doesn't agree with he calls biased or fake. He grasps at wind to self validate. He also become utterly delusional and irrational after the last election, so I swept him into the dustbin like the rest of the KKKult.
 
Back
Top