Damn dude, are you alright? Not making any sense. Get some help
I get it - lying is all you have. You sure don't have intelligence. So you post sleaze and slander, what's a Nazi to do?
Damn dude, are you alright? Not making any sense. Get some help
Just more random gibberish. God speed I guess.I get it - lying is all you have. You sure don't have intelligence. So you post sleaze and slander, what's a Nazi to do?
Sweetie pie, I don't expect you to, it's enough for you remembering to breathe. Not sure if you're aware, but others can see this conversation. Shocked? I'm guessing you are. If you managed to make it this far, out of pity I thought I'd throw you a question more in your intellectual wheelhouse. What color is your hair?Still didn't read.
Yet again, wasting your keystrokes.Sweetie pie, I don't expect you to, it's enough for you remembering to breathe. Not sure if you're aware, but others can see this conversation. Shocked? I'm guessing you are. If you managed to make it this far, out of pity I thought I'd throw you a question more in your intellectual wheelhouse. What color is your hair?
Please notice that you ask many stupid questions, the answers to which are obvious to those who pay attention.Pay Attention to what?????? The moon???
Too funny. You read every word.Yet again, wasting your keystrokes.
OMG is that serious?????Please notice that you ask many stupid questions, the answers to which are obvious to those who pay attention.
Nope. Jason Leopold from Bloomberg's made a strategic FOIA request that he knew would result in Trump's name being redacted. He then declared to his henchmen that the FBI have been instructed to redact Trump's name ... without mentioning that the "instruction" is FOIA exemption 6 and was fully anticipated. The henchmen, in turn, became "anonymous sources" who echoed to every media source that "investigative journalism" discovered FBI instructions to redact Trump's name from the Epstein files.FBI just said they redacted Trump's name from the files.
Why would you expect me to be as gullible as you?Why would they do that if his name wasn't in there?
You omitted two question marks from your really stupid question. You only wrote 5.OMG is that serious?????
Yes, of course, "it stands to reason," lol. Keep the dream alive. I understand, you need this, and you need this bad, lol.Epstein was definitely a client of trump's. It just stands to reason that it worked both ways.
There is none of the hard evidence you claim. Epstein did donate his plane to Clinton's charity, which did generate flight logs that are public records. Those flights were not to Epstein's Island. There is no airport on Epstein's Island. They were not even to the US Virgin Islands(where Epstein's Island is located). There is absolutely no hard evidence that either trump or Clinton were on Epstein's Island. There are witnesses who claim they saw both men on the island from afar... Which may or may not be accurate.
You sure do respond a lot to posts you don't read. lmaoYet again, wasting your keystrokes.
OMG, that is serious.You omitted two question marks from your really stupid question. You only wrote 5.
This is reminiscent of Adolf Hitler's rages towards the end of WW2Trump Melts Down in Unhinged Revenge Rant: ‘They Must Pay’
RAGE BAIT
The president is still trying to convince people that unfounded claims against Barack Obama are the “crime of the century.”
![]()
Trump Melts Down in Unhinged Revenge Rant: ‘They Must Pay’
President Donald Trump is once again pushing the widely disputed claim that Barack Obama attempted to stage a “coup” after the 2016 election, and insists those involved “must pay.” In a flurry of posts on Truth Social, the president has returned to his familiar playbook of trying to distract his...www.yahoo.com
![]()
Brendan McDermid / Brendan McDermid/Reuters
President Donald Trump is once again pushing the widely disputed claim that Barack Obama attempted to stage a “coup” after the 2016 election, and insists those involved “must pay.”
In a flurry of posts on Truth Social, the president has returned to his familiar playbook of trying to distract his MAGA base from the ongoing fallout of the Epstein files by repeating unfounded accusations against Obama and former U.S. intelligence officials who concluded Russia interfered in the 2016 election.
“The Russia, Russia, Russia HOAX is now TOTALLY UNDISPUTED! THE FACTS ARE ALL THERE, IN BLACK AND WHITE,” Trump posted Friday morning. “It is the biggest scandal in American History. The perpetrators of this CRIME must pay a big price. This can never be allowed to happen in our Country again!”
He then shared a video from The Daily Signal featuring right-wing historian Victor Davis Hanson accusing Obama-era intelligence leaders of conspiring to “destroy” Trump after his victory over Hillary Clinton. “They must pay for the crime of the Century,” Trump added.
![]()
Barack Obama said the claims against him were so
The renewed attacks stem from claims made earlier this month by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, who cited newly declassified documents to allege a “treasonous conspiracy” by Obama and senior national security officials to fabricate Russian election interference in order to undermine the legitimacy of the results.
Gabbard alleged that Obama, as well as national security officials, engaged in a “treasonous conspiracy” by manufacturing evidence of Russian interference at the 2016 election, and therefore trying to undermine the legitimacy of the results.
Gabbard accused Obama and his team of trying to lay the groundwork for “what was essentially a years-long coup against President Trump” while presenting misleading information.
Gabbard’s claims rely heavily on an apparent contradiction regarding U.S. intelligence findings in Jan. 2017 that Russia ran an influence campaign to help Trump in 2016 and separate unfounded claims that Moscow successfully manipulated votes in favor of the Republcian.
However, the Obama administration never claimed Russia changed vote totals or hacked voting machines.
In 2020, a report by the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee, which included the current Secretary of State Marco Rubio, also found that Russia had tried to help Trump’s 2016 campaign.
“Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes,” Obama’s office said in response to Gabbard’s allegations.
![]()
Tulsi Gabbard recommended a criminal investigation into the claims surrounding the Obama administration and the 2016 election. / Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
Elsewhere, a number of Trump loyalists including Deputy White House Chief of Staff Dan Scavino have reacted with glee after declassified documents showed the FBI investigated intelligence reports alleging Clinton approved a plan to try and vilify Trump by linking him to Vladimir Putin ahead of the 2016 election.
However, as noted by The New York Times, an annex to a 2023 report by Special Counsel John Durham suggests that this supposed approval from Clinton may have been out together by Russian spies.
The Truth Social posts from Trump attacking Obama came as the president continues to dig himself deeper into the furore about what he knows about the crimes of Epstein, the billionaire pedophile who died in Aug. 2019.
After years of claiming their friendship ended over a real estate dispute, Trump now says he cut ties with Epstein because the financier “stole” young workers from Mar-a-Lago.
“He took people. I say, ‘Don’t do it anymore,’ you know, they work for me,” Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One. “He took some others. Once he did that, that was the end of him.”
One of the women Trump alleged Epstein “stole” from him was Virginia Giuffre, a sex trafficking victim of Epstein’s who died via suicide in April.
TobyTurd, are you going to enlighten us with your unhinged buffoonery.You sure do respond a lot to posts you don't read. lmao
And where do you get your information, Wally?Epstein was definitely a client of trump's. It just stands to reason that it worked both ways.
There is none of the hard evidence you claim. Epstein did donate his plane to Clinton's charity, which did generate flight logs that are public records. Those flights were not to Epstein's Island. There is no airport on Epstein's Island. They were not even to the US Virgin Islands(where Epstein's Island is located). There is absolutely no hard evidence that either trump or Clinton were on Epstein's Island. There are witnesses who claim they saw both men on the island from afar... Which may or may not be accurate.
When will you provide us with the flight logs of Clinton flying to an island without an airport? Or any of the other evidence you claimed to have?Yes, of course
And where do you get your information, Wally? What 'witnesses'?Epstein was definitely a client of trump's. It just stands to reason that it worked both ways.
There is none of the hard evidence you claim. Epstein did donate his plane to Clinton's charity, which did generate flight logs that are public records. Those flights were not to Epstein's Island. There is no airport on Epstein's Island. They were not even to the US Virgin Islands(where Epstein's Island is located). There is absolutely no hard evidence that either trump or Clinton were on Epstein's Island. There are witnesses who claim they saw both men on the island from afar... Which may or may not be accurate.
Why are you paying attention to the Moon instead of his post?Pay Attention to what?????? The moon???
Laughing at yourself again, Sybil?Laughable coming from a magat.
What 'files', Sybil???FBI just said they redacted Trump's name from the files. Why would they do that if his name wasn't in there?