My take on the tea party

wiseones2cents

Verified User
We know there has been an explosion of grassroots kids that are heavily into politics which is great!!!The Elites/politicians are on the defense.

Thus the tea party.

Though this tea party movement is a smoke screen designed to redirect the movement.

These lead conspiracy guys(like Alex Jones, Jeff Beck, ect..) are in on it also.

When a political movement that is a threat to the Elites rule starts to emerge? What they do is they send a few of their people to infiltrate it and lead it. Once they have their people leading the movement, they can undermine it, feed them misinformation, redirect the cause to their liking. These elites are good at mass manipulating the public.

The tea party is a secular party and should not be trusted. These guys are trying to divide the country.Divide and conquer......

Here is a note:

When it comes to leadership in the Church of England, the former Bishop of Norwich once reportedly said: "If you want to lead someone in this part of the world, find out where they're going. And walk in front of them."

What are your thoughts? I already hear Rand Paul sticking up for the BRITISH oil company BP(which means he is pro business). Not to mention his grand father was a freemason and I wouldn't be surprised if both his father and himself are part of the club.
 
Wow.

From TEA Party to the Paul's assumed association to Freemasonry in one short post.

In your opinion is the TEA Party even a Political Party at all? Yes they are political protesters, using the history of the Boston Tea Party as a basis for gathering in protest, but they are disjointed often different portions of the TEA Party endorse opposing candidates in the same primary (They certainly did here in CO). They don't seem very effective as a Political Party, although they do seem effective in getting the R candidates to stop focusing on gay marriage and start focusing on limited constitutional government...

Now, can you also tell me how you think the Freemasons are associated with the TEA Party?
 
Wow.

From TEA Party to the Paul's assumed association to Freemasonry in one short post.

In your opinion is the TEA Party even a Political Party at all? Yes they are political protesters, using the history of the Boston Tea Party as a basis for gathering in protest, but they are disjointed often different portions of the TEA Party endorse opposing candidates in the same primary (They certainly did here in CO). They don't seem very effective as a Political Party, although they do seem effective in getting the R candidates to stop focusing on gay marriage and start focusing on limited constitutional government...

Now, can you also tell me how you think the Freemasons are associated with the TEA Party?

How aren't they?
 
Wow.

From TEA Party to the Paul's assumed association to Freemasonry in one short post.

In your opinion is the TEA Party even a Political Party at all? Yes they are political protesters, using the history of the Boston Tea Party as a basis for gathering in protest, but they are disjointed often different portions of the TEA Party endorse opposing candidates in the same primary (They certainly did here in CO). They don't seem very effective as a Political Party, although they do seem effective in getting the R candidates to stop focusing on gay marriage and start focusing on limited constitutional government...

Now, can you also tell me how you think the Freemasons are associated with the TEA Party?
They built their walls while wearing those funny aprons?
 
Don't look to me to define you, damo.
Look. I just want you to ask the question with a bit more information.

I asked several questions, more than one of them can fit with the question you asked. If you want me to answer a question, ask the question with less vagueness.

It's your question, define what you are asking.
 
Look. I just want you to ask the question with a bit more information.

I asked several questions, more than one of them can fit with the question you asked. If you want me to answer a question, ask the question with less vagueness.

It's your question, define what you are asking.

What do i get with MORE vagueness?
 
Who said vague is the same as wise?
I'm trying to find a reason why you would continue to be vague. I figured you would want to seem like you were in some way "better" for being vague and non-communicative in an environment solely created for communication.

It seems that you didn't. I'm good with that, you are just being vague because you don't really have a point then.
 
I'm trying to find a reason why you would continue to be vague. I figured you would want to seem like you were in some way "better" for being vague and non-communicative in an environment solely created for communication.

It seems that you didn't. I'm good with that, you are just being vague because you don't really have a point then.

Assume what you want, but you know what it does to the both of us.
 
Ha! Check that out coming from a KOC Mason wannabe! LOL

One could argue that we're simply wannabes, but considering the conditions that existed for American Catholics when Sweeny founded the KOC, that wouldn't be 100% accurate... :cof1:

Knights of Columbus. LOL> so low rent.

Hey, so long as the beer holds out and my life insurance annuity continues to grow, I've got no complaints...
 
Back
Top