OK school boss puts Bibles in classrooms but keeps nude pics on his work computer: Who's surprised?

Taichiliberal said:
No stupid, it means that the EYE WITNESSES account holds no more or less water than your boy's denial. There was no examine of his PC, which can be hooked up to the TV. No wonder junior didn't allow the news media to just see the TV.
Click to expand...
So ""NO PROOF""

Thanks for playing


If I were to say.....I saw where u posted support for ISIS on another forum .... does that make it true?



So why didn't they take pics of the screen ? Of is this something they claim they saw in a split second?
 
Last edited:
volsrocks said:
He doesn't have to prove shit

And there is no proof of nude women pics,,,its here say

Is a pic of a nude woman porn??
Click to expand...
Funny, but you assholes are constantly demanding "proof" regarding any and all allegations made by the MAGA media/congress/punditry against Dems, liberals, and progressives. Once again, you demonstrate the double standard that is a corner stone of you sheet wearing MAGA morons.

There's no proof that there wasn't nude women pics either.....his PC wasn't examined, and that can be hooked to the TV don't cha know.

And here's a reverse "what-about" ism for ya toodles. What if Gov. Pritzker or Sen. Sanders were in a similar situation. Would you be so cavalier about nude pics then?
 
volsrocks said:
The Bible does not call out simple nudity as being a sin..in the Bible the prophet Isaiah, was commanded by God to preach naked for three years
Click to expand...
So you go from denial, BS excuses and theory to biblical interpretation?

GMAFB, you pointy hooded buffoon!

Your own bible thumping brethren STRONGLY disagree with you!

Taichiliberal

Post in thread 'OK school boss puts Bibles in classrooms but keeps nude pics on his work computer: Who's surprised?'

volsrocks said:
Is a pic of a naked woman PORN?
Click to expand...
Why not ask your Christo-fascist hypocrites in Congress and the media? No wait, they've already told us:


Porn comes for the Greek word “porneia” which has the meaning of a harlot (one who sells their body for sex) and is mostly translated in the New Testament of the Bible as ‘fornication’ or ‘ mmorality’ (otherwise know as sexual activity in any form outside of the marriage relationship of a husband and a wife). So pornography is immoral (dirty, unclean) harlot images. That is male or...
volsrocks said:
stupidity is claiming a nude pic of a woman is porn
Click to expand...
Tell that to the plethora of Trump voting/supporting evangelical bullhorns out there, bunky. I'm sure they and there mega church minions will have a few choice words for you.

Bottom line: The Bible in it's usual contradictory, BS way says nudity is okay if it doesn't promote "lust". Since lust is suggestive, any nudity can be construed by the individual as promoting lust. And remember, my dim witted friend, RECOGNIZING NUDITY WAS ONE OF THE FIRST SINS OF ADAM AND EVE IN THE OLD TESTAMENT.

It's hysterical that you start repeating what the LIBERALS, FEMINISTS AND PSYCHOLOGISTS have been saying for decades WITHOUT referring to Judeo-Christian clap trap.

You're such a dancing fool ... totally out of your league with me. Carry on.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top