Arby was never taught science in school , he was a vocational/special education grad
And the ignorant gay bigoted racist mongrel still has to follow me around like a hungry puppy, never adding anything to the discussions.
Arby was never taught science in school , he was a vocational/special education grad
And the ignorant gay bigoted racist mongrel still has to follow me around like a hungry puppy, never adding anything to the discussions.
Often limited understanding of technical details on the part of journalists who are not necessarily trained in that particular science.
If you want to talk, say the 1970's "global cooling" thing then you'll have to accept the fact that in the 1970's those scientific papers predicting WARMING outnumbered those predicting COOLING by 6:1.
![]()
(Peterson 2008)
So there you go! Demonstrated easily and clearly even for you.
Why not question his trolling?Irony. "Never adding anything to the discussions".
I get it. You can't possibly talk about the science of climate because you don't know any. What you know are Right Wing Talking Points from Fox and OANN.
I'll be glad to talk about the OP and the science related to it. Just as soon as ANYONE shows up who can carry on a knowledgeable conversation on the topic.
I don't talk about the science of climate for they have nothing to do with changes in our climate. Again, you being an obvious lefty, do you believe
that our climate change that has raised our temperatures some 1% in the past century or so has anything to do with we humans and cows
releasing natural gases and farts?
Why not question his trolling?
Yes I do. Because the science is there. It's so simple it can be understood at even your level:
1. CO2 is a KNOWN greenhouse gas. This has been known and experimentally proven for the last 150 years.
2. CO2 is being produced by humans at extremely high levels (100X more than volcanoes for instance) and it is reflected in the isotopic composition of the atmospheric CO2 becoming enriched in 12-C and depleted in 13-C and 14-C exactly as expected from the burning of fossil fuels
3. Adding more CO2 (and other ghg's) causes the surface temperature to increase...exactly as we are seeing.
That's about all you need to know to understand it. Sure there's a LOT more detail to it and a LOT more evidence, but that's a good place to start.
WTF? You ok, dude?