DOJ says TACO, 79 mentioned several times
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Agree.
New Evidence of Obama Administration Conspiracy to ...
ODNI.gov
https://www.dni.gov › ... › Press Releases 2025
WASHINGTON, D.C. – On Friday, Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard revealed overwhelming evidence that demonstrates how, after President Trump ...
Your link does not work. Shocking
Tell us, what evidence did she reveal? I am waiting?
Yes it does.
- Mueller Report (2019): No wrongdoing by Obama or his administration related to Russia.
- Senate Intelligence Committee (Bipartisan, 2020): No evidence Obama committed any crime.
- Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s Report (2019): Found serious procedural errors by the FBI in the FISA warrant process, but no political bias or misconduct by Obama or top White House officials.
Now it goes to a general website for the DNI, nothing there to substantiate your allegations.
Read the link, have an adult explain the contents.
NEW EVIDENCE OF OBAMA ADMINISTRATION CONSPIRACY TO SUBVERT PRESIDENT TRUMP’S 2016 VICTORY AND PRESIDENCY
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
ODNI News Release No. 15-25
July 18, 2025
New Evidence of Obama Administration Conspiracy to Subvert President Trump’s 2016 Victory and Presidency
WASHINGTON, D.C. – On Friday, Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard revealed overwhelming evidence that demonstrates how, after President Trump won the 2016 election against Hillary Clinton, President Obama and his national security cabinet members manufactured and politicized intelligence to lay the groundwork for what was essentially a years-long coup against President Trump.- In the months leading up to the November 2016 election, the Intelligence Community (IC) consistently assessed that Russia is “probably not trying … to influence the election by using cyber means.”
- On December 7, 2016, after the election, talking points were prepared for DNI James Clapper stating, “Foreign adversaries did not use cyberattacks on election infrastructure to alter the US Presidential election outcome.”
- On December 9, 2016, President Obama’s White House gathered top National Security Council Principals for a meeting that included James Clapper, John Brennan, Susan Rice, John Kerry, Loretta Lynch, Andrew McCabe and others, to discuss Russia.
- After the meeting, DNI Clapper’s Executive Assistant sent an email to IC leaders tasking them with creating a new IC assessment “per the President’s request” that details the “tools Moscow used and actions it took to influence the 2016 election.” It went on to say, “ODNI will lead this effort with participation from CIA, FBI, NSA, and DHS.”
- Obama officials leaked false statements to media outlets, including The Washington Post, claiming, “Russia has attempted through cyber means to interfere in, if not actively influence, the outcome of an election.”
- On January 6, 2017, a new Intelligence Community Assessment was released that directly contradicted the IC assessments that were made throughout the previous six months.
I did, nothing there. Pitiful.
You cut off a sentence and posted it to make the illusion there was some evidence.
Entertaining.
Read post no. 73, have an adult explain it to you.
You’ve contradicted yourself twice anlready…are you drunk?
Ok, finally.NEW EVIDENCE OF OBAMA ADMINISTRATION CONSPIRACY TO SUBVERT PRESIDENT TRUMP’S 2016 VICTORY AND PRESIDENCY
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
ODNI News Release No. 15-25
July 18, 2025
New Evidence of Obama Administration Conspiracy to Subvert President Trump’s 2016 Victory and Presidency
WASHINGTON, D.C. – On Friday, Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard revealed overwhelming evidence that demonstrates how, after President Trump won the 2016 election against Hillary Clinton, President Obama and his national security cabinet members manufactured and politicized intelligence to lay the groundwork for what was essentially a years-long coup against President Trump.
- In the months leading up to the November 2016 election, the Intelligence Community (IC) consistently assessed that Russia is “probably not trying … to influence the election by using cyber means.”
- On December 7, 2016, after the election, talking points were prepared for DNI James Clapper stating, “Foreign adversaries did not use cyberattacks on election infrastructure to alter the US Presidential election outcome.”
- On December 9, 2016, President Obama’s White House gathered top National Security Council Principals for a meeting that included James Clapper, John Brennan, Susan Rice, John Kerry, Loretta Lynch, Andrew McCabe and others, to discuss Russia.
- After the meeting, DNI Clapper’s Executive Assistant sent an email to IC leaders tasking them with creating a new IC assessment “per the President’s request” that details the “tools Moscow used and actions it took to influence the 2016 election.” It went on to say, “ODNI will lead this effort with participation from CIA, FBI, NSA, and DHS.”
- Obama officials leaked false statements to media outlets, including The Washington Post, claiming, “Russia has attempted through cyber means to interfere in, if not actively influence, the outcome of an election.”
- On January 6, 2017, a new Intelligence Community Assessment was released that directly contradicted the IC assessments that were made throughout the previous six months.
There is a list of claims that members of the Obama Administration published a report differing from some reports of the intelligence community.
There is NOTHING in there saying Obama did anything criminal. You don't even have allegations. Just a list of things that happened.
Intelligence reports often differ.
Where is the CRIME in issuing a report that comes to a different conclusion than a previous report?
Where is it that Obama himself directed anyone to do this?
Are you this naive?
Nope the documents that Gabbard released prove what Earl and I have told you. This is about to get "Western"
I read it, despite the allegation, there is nothing in the report offering any evidence of a crime, only that The Obama Administration (not Obama himself) issued a report that came to a different conclusion than a previous report. NOT A CRIME.
You claimed there was evidence OBAMA committed a crime.