When is CO2 long range IR wavelengths maxed out in the atmosphere

[archives]

I'm listening to what you have to say about HUD. Talk to me about HUD.


... and the majority of other's who worship the Climate religion ...


This world is full of stupid people, to include scientifically illiterate morons who do not even know what science is, who cannot even recognize a religion that they themselves are worshiping, and who have been instructed to believe by their clergy that their religion is thettled thienth.

You are one of those amazingly stupid people. Notice that once again you resorted to pointing to people, i.e. members of your congregation, and steered completely clear of discussing any science so that you don't get instantly picked apart and ridiculed.


You don't speak for the US military. There is no such thing as a global climate for anyone to "understand." Your religion is stupid and egregiously violates physics. You are an undereducated leftist moron.

How in the hell does HUD even remotely relate to this thread?

Last I knew, religion isn’t based on science, climate change is, so sounds like you are guilty of practicing religion

Did discuss science, I provided the arguments provided by NASA, all this thread presented was the views of a “Linnea Lueken,” via a blog video no less

I didn’t speak for the military, rather gave you the military’s policy on climate change, which is based upon its reality

If you got nothing to offer but insults and what you want to believe is true stop wasting everyone’s time

 

[IBDaMann]

How in the hell does HUD even remotely relate to this thread?

How the hell does NASA even remotely relate to this topic? HUD and NASA are government bureaucracies who manage contracts. You think that they are science, for some reason.

Last I knew, religion isn’t based on science,

It's not. You, however, refer to your stupid religion as science, owing mostly to you not knowing what either science or religion is.

climate change is,

Climate Change is your stupid religion that has nothing to do with any science. If you weren't so completely scientifically illiterate, you might be able to figure this out.

Did discuss science,

Nope. You never did, because you never could. You are scientifically illiterate and wouldn't be able to rise above the level of pure gibberish.

I provided the arguments provided by NASA,

You provided no science, but as you can see, you insist that you did, owing to the fact that you have no idea what science even is. You think that sicence is data ... non-existent data to be specific.

all this thread presented was the views of a “Linnea Lueken,” via a blog video no less

All this thread presented was the religious dogma of Linnea Lueken, who is considered a heretic by mainstream Climate theists because he adheres to the sacriligeous doctrine of the non-catastrophic nature of Global Warming. In any event, his (your) denomination is just as stupid as the mainstream warmizombie faith.

I didn’t speak for the military

You sure did. In fact, you pretended to speak to what the military "understands." Foul. Your argument gets tossed on this basis alone.

, rather gave you the military’s policy on climate change,

There is no military policy on Climate Change that doesn't break down completely into totally ambiguous nonsense because of lacking definitions. All DoD policy on Climate Change came about from Biden's handlers infusing loads of Climate Change doctrinal buzz words that are either totally contradictory or totally devoid of definition. All this came about by Biden's handlers using the autopen while Joe took a nap.

There is no deliberate plan at STRATCOM to either deal with Climate Change or to implement any Climate Change policy.

If you got nothing to offer but insults

Since you have no science to discuss, it looks like we're done here.

 

[archives]

How the hell does NASA even remotely relate to this topic? HUD and NASA are government bureaucracies who manage contracts. You think that they are science, for some reason.


It's not. You, however, refer to your stupid religion as science, owing mostly to you not knowing what either science or religion is.


Climate Change is your stupid religion that has nothing to do with any science. If you weren't so completely scientifically illiterate, you might be able to figure this out.


Nope. You never did, because you never could. You are scientifically illiterate and wouldn't be able to rise above the level of pure gibberish.


You provided no science, but as you can see, you insist that you did, owing to the fact that you have no idea what science even is. You think that sicence is data ... non-existent data to be specific.


All this thread presented was the religious dogma of Linnea Lueken, who is considered a heretic by mainstream Climate theists because he adheres to the sacriligeous doctrine of the non-catastrophic nature of Global Warming. In any event, his (your) denomination is just as stupid as the mainstream warmizombie faith.


You sure did. In fact, you pretended to speak to what the military "understands." Foul. Your argument gets tossed on this basis alone.


There is no military policy on Climate Change that doesn't break down completely into totally ambiguous nonsense because of lacking definitions. All DoD policy on Climate Change came about from Biden's handlers infusing loads of Climate Change doctrinal buzz words that are either totally contradictory or totally devoid of definition. All this came about by Biden's handlers using the autopen while Joe took a nap.

There is no deliberate plan at STRATCOM to either deal with Climate Change or to implement any Climate Change policy.


Since you have no science to discuss, it looks like we're done here.

Showed you exactly with documentation how NASA plus the U.S. Military are relevant to the topic, which as more than your argument has done outside a blog featuring some “Linnea Lueken”

And to claim NASA isn’t involve or deals with Science in what they do is asinine, flat out stupid, and is about as far as anyone needs to go to know that you haven’t a clue what you are talking about

 

[IBDaMann]

Showed you exactly with documentation how NASA plus the U.S. Military are relevant to the topic,

Nope! You made stupid, exaggerated claims of major ambiguousness. Answer the question: What does NASA have to do with your stupid religion?

And to claim NASA isn’t involve or deals with Science in what they do is asinine, flat out stupid, and is about as far as anyone needs to go to know that you haven’t a clue what you are talking about

... says the grown adult who still doesn't even know what science is. Too funny! You are the one who has no clue. It's hilarious watching you treat a government bureacracy as though it is science, and treat government bureaucrats as though they are religious clergy to be OBEYED.

... *AND* ... still no science from you for anyone to discuss. Of course, you wouldn't know what science you should post, or even what constitutes science. You think data is science. You believe that anything uttered by a "NASA astronaut" is science to be worshiped as religion.

Read my sig. Your religion is still stupid.

 

[Noking]

Nope! You made stupid, exaggerated claims of major ambiguousness. Answer the question: What does NASA have to do with your stupid religion?


... says the grown adult who still doesn't even know what science is. Too funny! You are the one who has no clue. It's hilarious watching you treat a government bureacracy as though it is science, and treat government bureaucrats as though they are religious clergy to be OBEYED.

... *AND* ... still no science from you for anyone to discuss. Of course, you wouldn't know what science you should post, or even what constitutes science. You think data is science. You believe that anything uttered by a "NASA astronaut" is science to be worshiped as religion.

Read my sig. Your religion is still stupid.

The Grand Wiz will straighten them out

 

[IBDaMann]

When a molecule vibrates more intensely it registers as an increase in temperature.

It's the other way around. When a molecule increases in temperature, it vibrates more intensely.

The capture of energy in the atmosphere heats up the atmosphere.

Heat cannot be captured. You've had plenty of time to educate yourself on the science you pretend to discuss.

This increase in atmospheric temperature is part of the earth's warming.

Define earth's "warming."

 

[serenity]

View: https://youtu.be/kc-u6wbz9Dc?si=lF_5-L0-svxIr1Lv

How many forms of carbon are their in a molecular state of characteristics? 3 with a max of 4 dimensions. Gaseous, liquid, mineral characteristics being part of periodic elements forming universal positions changing forms shaped universally here now, evolving into constantly changing forms present.

Doesn't carbon support the transfer of energy flows especially within 6 separate types electrical currents controlling contracting results of expanding details never same total sum of existence forward here now?

Climate changes comes from having as many temperate zones horizontally as their are time zones vertically on this rotating planet and 8 seasonal shifts within 2 solstices and equinoxes native to this specific atmosphere where evolutionary results are never same total sum developed forward here, not.

Series parallel time when existing in a perpetual balancing outcome position as displaced one ancestor here now when simultaneously 8.2 billion are alive between 5 ancestral lineages with 5 generation gaps living one person at a time in plain sight of geographical position since conception.

Ever hear the term self evident results?

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

It's the other way around. When a molecule increases in temperature, it vibrates more intensely.

You say tomato. I say science.

Heat cannot be captured. You've had plenty of time to educate yourself on the science you pretend to discuss.

Why would someone that professes to be so well informed as you try to argue that all energy is heat? Did you forget how smart you claimed to be?

Define earth's "warming."

I see you decided to get tomato all over your face. Maybe if you vibrated more intensely.

 

[IBDaMann]

You say tomato.

Science is all cause -> effect. One easy way to spot a leftist regurgitant is to note the conflation of cause and effect. When you regurgitate the exact science illiteracy you were ordered to believe, you make it obvious that you take no responsibility for what you are writing.

I say science.

... but you know it's your religion.

Why would someone that professes to be so well informed as you try to argue that all energy is heat?

False subjunctive error.

Did you forget how smart you claimed to be?

I wouldn't call it a "claim" so much as an observation..

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Science is all cause -> effect. One easy way to spot a leftist regurgitant is to note the conflation of cause and effect. When you regurgitate the exact science illiteracy you were ordered to believe, you make it obvious that you take no responsibility for what you are writing.


... but you know it's your religion.


False subjunctive error.


I wouldn't call it a "claim" so much as an observation..

Your face is so red with tomato at this point.

 

[IBDaMann]

Your face is so red with tomato at this point.

You wouldn't know, you're facing the other way as you flee to the hills.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

You wouldn't know, you're facing the other way as you flee to the hills.

You are the one claiming that temperature increased before added energy caused increased vibration.

 

[IBDaMann]

You are the one claiming that temperature increased before added energy caused increased vibration.

I am claiming that additional thermal energy causes a temperature increase which causes increased vibration. Let me know how, exactly, you are becoming confused.