Can we dispense with the nonsense that women can do anything men can do already?

The top team in the WNBA could not beat an average boys HS team. Men also have more brains - that's why we have female only chess leagues and math olympiads and even poker tournaments! Even in intellectual sports women are inferior.

There is no GIANT CONSPIRACY holding down the weaker sex. They have been failures throughout history because they are so inferior.

No stupid. What determines success is PARTICIPATION RATE.

Canadians do not have hockey gene, we have high participation rate which means more reach the top levels.

Women have been participating in chess and math olympics and poke a LOT less time and in less numbers for various reasons and thus you see less representation at the upper levels.

You increase the participation rate, whether it is hockey or math Olympiad and suddenly you see more top performers.

if you think it a conspiracy as to why that is because you are stupid. It is all participation rate.

See Cuba, Japan, Dominican Republic for baseball as just another example of why it is entirely participation rate
 
Having babies can't be that painful. Peop

Agree 100%. What I posted is not to say that women do not bring value. They obviously do. But, there isn't a person around who when trapped in a burning building wouldn't want someone looking like Jack Reacher showing up to carry them out than Carrie Underwood
Well I have had women tell me there kidney stone was more painful than having a baby. So who knows :dunno:
 
Yes. His unsubstantiated claim that "modern day feminist movement has tricked everyone into believing that on the whole, women are equally physically as capable as men. " That's just limp-dicked geezer dementia posting. The kicker is that the Twitter link says nothing about it....and it's British.

I feel sorry that JPP Geezers like Teflon Don are lonely and lack the social skills to have a female companion, but their own hate is what is stopping them from having a healthy relationship with a woman.
Non-sequitur fallacies. Random statements. No apparent coherency.
 
Agree.

Its is important not to exclude individuals because they possess traits not associated with whatever category they are in. We need to make room for the outliers, because they are valuable.

It is not helpful that anyone cries like that in public.
If they are not in the category, they are excluded, by definition.
If they are not associated with a category, they are excluded, by definition.

You can't have it both ways, Pretender.
You can't include and exclude them at the same time! :laugh:
 
No it is not irrelevant.

You do not get to say that women being weaker to most men does not matter when most men are weaker than the top men.

That is you arbitrarily setting a line.

If 90% of men are far less strong and thus competent that the top 10% for physical tasks why would we want those 90% of men to then do those jobs. Saying 'because they are stronger than women' is not an answer.

If what you care about is 'physical strength only' then only the 10% of men qualify.

if you care about more than that, then you cannot focus the discussion only on physical strength and in which case women will rank higher most men in many areas, especially when it comes to using their brain. See my post about them crushing us men in all education areas.
when even most of those 90% of men are still stronger than most women, that comparison is indeed irrelevant because most of those men can, and still, do those jobs.
 
they are increasingly taking all the best jobs and increasingly making more money and leaving magats, in particular in the 'will not date or marry' heap, making those men mad and want to burn the world.
you are seriously misinformed. Most of those women don't understand what a man wants. sometimes they don't even understand what they want, until it's too late. there's video evidence of this all over the internet. It's why financial futures show firms investing in boxed wine and cat food. By 2030, over half of woman will be unmarried and childless, despite the money that they make.
 
How about measuring by 'strength of character' and 'morals', which i think are key to leadership?

What we have seen as Trump broke law after law and threatened Congress and others is it is almost ALWAYS women who are willing to stand their ground and not cow to the bully tactics, no matter the personal or career cost.

what men have shown, from the top CEO's to Congress and other is we are absolutely weak in the face of any threat and would sell out our country and friends and family to save our own asses.

Look how many magat Congress people are now massively damaging their voters with the big stupid bill by taking away all the supports they rely upon.
this is another tactic that weak feminist men try to use....turning their own issues of weakness and blaming others for it.

But reality will eventually show you that you are the problem.
 
Who spends time thinking women can do everything a man can do? Better yet, who spends thinking other people think women can do everything a man can do? Did you think someone was going to jump in and argue women can absolutely do everything a man can do?
the view. they did when john mcenroe said serena williams was the best womans tennis player ever. I swear you people are retarded
 
You presented a Mythbusters episode, and I was responding to that. You offered no additional proofs. I pointed out that the Mythbusters methodology was lacking, as it often is, in proving what they set out to prove.
Yes but that is because you are stupid.

Mythbusters did not say 'women can endure more cold' they said they could endure mor PAIN and they did a test to prove it but they also spoke to scientists and Dr's who study pain who state the same thing and had a suite of tests they could have used and myth busters just chose this one.

If they did 5 tests you would say 'well that is just 5 test, what about the other areas' because your brain does not understand that in testing a hypothesis you do NOT have to test all possible iterations.
 
Yes but that is because you are stupid.
Mantra 1a.
Mythbusters did not say 'women can endure more cold' they said they could endure mor PAIN
when they were clearly testing for cold.
and they did a test to prove it but they also spoke to scientists
Mythbusters is not science, Kewpie.
and Dr's who study pain who state the same thing and had a suite of tests they could have used and myth busters just chose this one.
It's not about pain. It's about the stupid notion that women can do anything men can do.
If they did 5 tests you would say 'well that is just 5 test, what about the other areas' because your brain does not understand that in testing a hypothesis you do NOT have to test all possible iterations.
Not a hypothesis. A theory. Go learn English.
 
you are seriously misinformed. Most of those women don't understand what a man wants. sometimes they don't even understand what they want, until it's too late. there's video evidence of this all over the internet. It's why financial futures show firms investing in boxed wine and cat food. By 2030, over half of woman will be unmarried and childless, despite the money that they make.
No you watch too much magat media.

Women are much better savers than men generally and take much less risk with the money they earn.

It is fact that men go bankrupt and commit suicide at a much higher rate and end up HOMELESS at a much higher rate.

Get off magat media and read some actual data as almost everything you say is backwards.

Mens suicides are rising and they are living at home much longer than ever before.
 
No you watch too much magat media.
WTF is 'magat media'?????
Women are much better savers than men generally and take much less risk with the money they earn.
Not true. Men tend to make more money. Few women want to clean out the bottom of some filthy bilge. Few women have what it takes to drive an elbow pin into a backhoe, or to climb a 1000ft radio tower to change a light bulb and repack the grease in the connectors, or to clean the rotted goo out of a silo.
It is fact that men go bankrupt and commit suicide at a much higher rate and end up HOMELESS at a much higher rate.
Go learn what 'fact' means, Kewpie. It does NOT mean 'Universal Truth'.
Get off magat media
WTF is 'magat media'????? Buzzword fallacy.
and read some actual data as almost everything you say is backwards.
What data?????? You never presented any!
Mens suicides are rising and they are living at home much longer than ever before.
Argument from randU fallacy. Making shit up won't cut it, Kewpie.
 
Back
Top