He's simply using MAGAt Rule #4:Nothing? What did I do?
When the conversation isn't going your way, change the subject.
View: https://x.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/1937544173126553638
View: https://x.com/detroitboy_rmc/status/1939120185702588420
He's simply using MAGAt Rule #4:Nothing? What did I do?
He did nothing except be black.
I wish! Felonious’ head would explode
I'd ask you which Logical Fallacy you just committed, Terry, but expect you'd just run away from it....again. Sad.I recommend you get this book.
![]()
I don’t care.
That does not make it true.
Phannie, you first.I wish! Felonious’ head would explode
Phannie, you first.
Damn that was about the best comeback response that needs nothing but a can I please have some more sir!!! Brilliant and so on point!!He wasn’t Bush and the world rejoiced.
A lot of words that don't address the fact of what Iran had for Uranium and why they had it after some idiot President threw out the treaty that prevented them from having it.
- You coudln't discern facts if they were tattooed on your forehead; here's the $BILLIONS the Obamidiots (including Bidumb) handed to Iran:
- Obama Administration: As part of the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), some Iranian funds held in foreign banks due to sanctions were unfrozen. The exact amount of usable funds accessed by Iran is disputed, with estimates ranging from $32 billion (according to a former Iranian official) to $56 billion (according to the US Treasury Secretary at the time).
- Obama Administration: In a separate event, the Obama administration transferred $1.7 billion in cash to Iran in 2016, which was a reimbursement for military equipment Iran had purchased from the US in the late 1970s but was never delivered. This payment was timed with the release of several American prisoners held in Iran.
- Biden Administration: In August 2023, the Biden administration allowed Iran access to $6 billion in oil assets frozen in South Korea in exchange for the release of five US hostages held in Iran. However, reports indicate that access to these funds was stalled following an agreement with Qatar in October 2023, meaning Iran may not have yet accessed this specific amount.
- Biden Administration: In March 2024, the Biden administration reportedly allowed Iran to access another $10 billion in frozen assets, according to DW.
- Biden Administration: In November 2024, the Biden administration renewed a sanctions waiver allowing Iraq to continue purchasing electricity from Iran and facilitating Iran's access to roughly $10 billion held in escrow in Iraq for electricity revenue. This waiver has been renewed multiple times and allows the funds to be used for humanitarian trade, such as food, medicine, and agricultural products. Some sources claim that the administration "granted" this money to Iran, while others emphasize that it allows access to funds already owed to Iran for energy sales.
Biden handed over $16 billion to Iran.
And have some more ACTUAL FACTS:
FROM AS FAR BACK AS Obama: (2015), Iran violating the bullshit treaty Iran used to scam the Dunce-o-crats.
Iran has consistently sought to hide its nuclear activities from the internationalcommunity and repeatedly cheated on past nuclear agreements. Both the Natanz and Fordow enrichment plants were built covertly; Iran has razed and paved over a suspected nuclear testing site at Parchin rather than let inspectors visit it; and Iran continued its nuclear activities after telling the European Union it would suspend them in 2003 and failed to fully comply with the interim Joint Plan of Action that just expired. From the beginning of negotiations with Iran, it has been clear that a good deal would require not just constraining its nuclear program but also putting in place sufficient mechanisms to ensure that its compliance could be monitored and verified.
The final agreement announced on July 14, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), does contain significant enhancements to the International Atomic Energy Agency’s (IAEA) current ability to monitor Iran’s nuclear facilities. The deal, President Obama told the nation, “is not built on trust, it is built on verification.” Yet, one critical provision of the JCPOA puts unexpected limitations on inspectors’ access to certain facilities by requiring them to notify Iran first if they suspect a site might be being used for illicit nuclear activity and then undergoing a long process in order to gain entry to that site. This obstacle to inspections is worrying for several reasons:
- Iran could delay inspectors for as long as 54, not the commonly reported 24, days
- The burden of proof is on IAEA
- It chills intelligence sharing
- It discourages long shots
- It does not address a parallel enrichment program
- And it could allow for weaponization activities
Inspections at Declared vs. Suspicious Facilities
Under the JCPOA, Iran and the IAEA are required to draw up a list of “declared facilities,” sites that Iran agrees are part of its nuclear program. Pretty much every facility that we know about today?from the mines where Iran digs up uranium ore, to the factories that build its centrifuges, to the actual enrichment plants?will likely be put on this list. International inspectors would have wide-ranging access to these declared facilities and will be allowed to use modern technologies, including real-time monitoring, to verify that Iran is not violating any of its obligations at these sites.
Now, makeup some more bullshit.
They have about 400 kilos of 60% enriched uranium. Anyone who believes the Iranians were stupid enough to keep it under the mountain after President Two Weeks kept threatening to bomb it is an idiot.A lot of words that don't address the fact of what Iran had for Uranium and why they had it after some idiot President threw out the treaty that prevented them from having it.
The issue is when they got that uranium and why.They have about 400 kilos of 60% enriched uranium. Anyone who believes the Iranians were stupid enough to keep it under the mountain after President Two Weeks kept threatening to bomb it is an idiot.
Do you really believe that the same group of folks that gave Obama a Peace Prize for being Obama will ever vote to give the same thing to Trump?Can't wait to enjoy watching leftninny heads explode when Trump wins the prize.
View attachment 53819
Yes, they appear to have enriched it after Trump tubed Obama's treaty. While that's not enriched enough for a fissionable bomb, it's certainly enough for a dirty bomb if not a fizzle yield bomb.The issue is when they got that uranium and why.
After the US and Iran had a treaty under Obama, Iran and 0 kilos of 60% enriched uranium and had 0 kilogras of 20% enriched uranium. Then Trump tore up the agreement and now Iran has 400 kilos of 60%. The fact that Iran has that 400 kilos can be tied directly to the actions of that Idiot President Trump.
You lying Stalinists ever uncover the as yet still UNNAMED "UNDERLYING CRIME" USED TO CONVICT HIM OF NOTHING IN YOUR KANGAROO COURT?I wish! Felonious’ head would explode
Give the Nobel Peace Prize to an oath-breaking, adulterous pedophile who threatens to take the Panama canal and Greenland by force? Doubtful.Do you really believe that the same group of folks that gave Obama a Peace Prize for being Obama will ever vote to give the same thing to Trump?
Ahhhh, you mad bro because your Daddy is a criminal?You lying Stalinists ever uncover the as yet still UNNAMED "UNDERLYING CRIME" USED TO CONVICT HIM OF NOTHING IN YOUR KANGAROO COURT?
Didn't think so....
MAGAts believe the rich and powerful should be able to do whatever they like.Ahhhh, you mad bro because your Daddy is a criminal?
No, I'm mad because an illegal, preposterous pseudo-prosecution was allowed in NYC to gain a conviction for non-crimes against a political opponent.Ahhhh, you mad bro because your Daddy is a criminal?
A judge and jury convicted him TWICE. The fact you don't understand this point is evidence your mind is irrational.No, I'm mad because an illegal, preposterous pseudo-prosecution was allowed in NYC to gain a conviction for non-crimes against a political opponent.
I notice you failed to ;produce the "underlying crime" that Bragg and judge used to fabricate non-existent "felonies"
Having trouble finding it?