Mark Levin on Tariffs and courts.

[SmarterthanYou]

pretending to be confused is weak sauce.

you said that the constitution trumps the commerce clause, yet the commerce clause is part of the constitution. so, yes, you're obviously confused

 

[SmarterthanYou]

treaties regulate interaction with foreign nations, and those are stricly under the purview of the executive.

that means the president.

treaties are approved, or vetoed, by the senate.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

treaties are approved, or vetoed, by the senate.

ok.

the commerce clause is still outranked by the constitution and no representative has a say.

senators have a small say.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

you libertarians actually hate the constitution and just only suck globalist dicks.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

ok.

the commerce clause is still outranked by the constitution and no representative has a say.

senators have a small say.

Dude, you've let your adoration for trump cloud your judgement and reasoning.....so much so, that you have clearly forgotten how the constitution works. The legislative is the sole purveyor of commerce power. what little commerce power the executive has was given to the executive by congressional approval and can be revoked at any time.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

Dude, you've let your adoration for trump cloud your judgement and reasoning.....so much so, that you have clearly forgotten how the constitution works. The legislative is the sole purveyor of commerce power. what little commerce power the executive has was given to the executive by congressional approval and can be revoked at any time.

no.

the constitution gave the president treaty power.

trade agreements are the purview of the president.

that's what the constitution says.

want me to quote it again?

I'm sorry your globalism has made you a deranged fascist.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

no.

the constitution gave the president treaty power.

trade agreements are the purview of the president.

that's what the constitution says.

want me to quote it again?

I'm sorry your globalism has made you a deranged fascist.

the constitution says that the senate can approve or veto a treaty proposed by the president, so trade agreements are NOT the sole purview of the president

 

[Sammy Jankis]

the constitution says that the senate can approve or veto a treaty proposed by the president, so trade agreements are NOT the sole purview of the president

basically sole purview.

the commerce clause is definitely trumped by the constitution.

you know this.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

basically sole purview.

the commerce clause is definitely trumped by the constitution.

you know this.

ROFL the constitution trumps the constitution. I wish you could hear how stupid that sounds

 

[Sammy Jankis]

ROFL the constitution trumps the constitution. I wish you could hear how stupid that sounds

I misspoke on that one.

the constitution trumps whatever law gave some power to Congress on this issue.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

you still lost.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

if you're saying a law can take away the president's contitutional powers then you don't understand the constitution or the concept of any constitutional government.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

if you're saying a law can take away the president's contitutional powers then you don't understand the constitution or the concept of any constitutional government.

the commerce clause resides with the legislative branch. all things regarding commerce, taxes, tariffs, trade agreements, etc.