signalmankenneth
Verified User
President Donald Trump again claimed "total obliteration" of Iran's nuclear program during the NATO summit in the Netherlands on Wednesday, dismissing an early Pentagon report suggesting the joint U.S.-Israeli strikes on Tehran's facilities may have only set its program back by a matter of months.
"I believe it was total obliteration," Trump told reporters speaking alongside NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in The Hague, Netherlands.
A preliminary analysis of the strikes by the Defense Intelligence Agency and U.S. Central Command prompted questions as the efficacy of the operation. Two people familiar with the report told ABC News it suggested the strikes did limited damage and that Iran was able to relocate highly enriched uranium stocks before the strikes occurred.
"I believe they didn't have a chance to get anything out, because we acted fast," Trump said. "If it would have taken two weeks, maybe. But it's very hard to remove that kind of material, very hard and very dangerous. Plus, they knew we were coming, and if they know we're coming, they're not going to be down there."
Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said Wednesday that the country's nuclear facilities had been "badly damaged," as quoted by the Associated Press.
Trump insisted Iran's nuclear program had been set back "basically decades," adding, "It's gone for years."
Asked if they could rebuild and whether the U.S. would strike again, Trump said that would be someone else's problem.
"I'm not going to have to worry about that," he said. "It's gone for years, years, very tough to rebuild, because the whole thing is collapsed. In other words, inside, it's all collapsed. Nobody can get in to see it, because it's collapsed."
Asked if he trusted U.S. intelligence, the president said the initial report was "very inconclusive. The intelligence says we don't know, it could have been very severe, that's what the intelligence says. So I guess that's correct, but I think we can take the 'we don't know.' It was very severe. It was obliteration."
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio also spoke in support of the president's position, having accompanied Trump to The Hague.
"Given the 30,000 lbs of explosives and capability of those munitions, it was devastation underneath Fordo," Hegseth said.
"Any assessment that tells you it was something otherwise is speculating with other motives," Hegseth continued. "And we know that because when you actually look at the report, by the way, it was a top secret report, it was preliminary, it was low confidence."
Hegseth suggested the leak of the report had "a political motive," adding, "We're doing a leak investigation with the FBI right now because this information is for internal purposes."
Rubio also claimed that the leak of the preliminary report was politically motivated, saying that the attacks led to "complete and total obliteration."
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-says-iran-nuclear-program-111558288.html

"I believe it was total obliteration," Trump told reporters speaking alongside NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in The Hague, Netherlands.
A preliminary analysis of the strikes by the Defense Intelligence Agency and U.S. Central Command prompted questions as the efficacy of the operation. Two people familiar with the report told ABC News it suggested the strikes did limited damage and that Iran was able to relocate highly enriched uranium stocks before the strikes occurred.
"I believe they didn't have a chance to get anything out, because we acted fast," Trump said. "If it would have taken two weeks, maybe. But it's very hard to remove that kind of material, very hard and very dangerous. Plus, they knew we were coming, and if they know we're coming, they're not going to be down there."
Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said Wednesday that the country's nuclear facilities had been "badly damaged," as quoted by the Associated Press.
Trump insisted Iran's nuclear program had been set back "basically decades," adding, "It's gone for years."
Asked if they could rebuild and whether the U.S. would strike again, Trump said that would be someone else's problem.
"I'm not going to have to worry about that," he said. "It's gone for years, years, very tough to rebuild, because the whole thing is collapsed. In other words, inside, it's all collapsed. Nobody can get in to see it, because it's collapsed."
Asked if he trusted U.S. intelligence, the president said the initial report was "very inconclusive. The intelligence says we don't know, it could have been very severe, that's what the intelligence says. So I guess that's correct, but I think we can take the 'we don't know.' It was very severe. It was obliteration."
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio also spoke in support of the president's position, having accompanied Trump to The Hague.
"Given the 30,000 lbs of explosives and capability of those munitions, it was devastation underneath Fordo," Hegseth said.
"Any assessment that tells you it was something otherwise is speculating with other motives," Hegseth continued. "And we know that because when you actually look at the report, by the way, it was a top secret report, it was preliminary, it was low confidence."
Hegseth suggested the leak of the report had "a political motive," adding, "We're doing a leak investigation with the FBI right now because this information is for internal purposes."
Rubio also claimed that the leak of the preliminary report was politically motivated, saying that the attacks led to "complete and total obliteration."
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-says-iran-nuclear-program-111558288.html
