Trump maintains Iran strikes caused 'total obliteration'

signalmankenneth

Verified User
President Donald Trump again claimed "total obliteration" of Iran's nuclear program during the NATO summit in the Netherlands on Wednesday, dismissing an early Pentagon report suggesting the joint U.S.-Israeli strikes on Tehran's facilities may have only set its program back by a matter of months.

"I believe it was total obliteration," Trump told reporters speaking alongside NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in The Hague, Netherlands.

A preliminary analysis of the strikes by the Defense Intelligence Agency and U.S. Central Command prompted questions as the efficacy of the operation. Two people familiar with the report told ABC News it suggested the strikes did limited damage and that Iran was able to relocate highly enriched uranium stocks before the strikes occurred.

"I believe they didn't have a chance to get anything out, because we acted fast," Trump said. "If it would have taken two weeks, maybe. But it's very hard to remove that kind of material, very hard and very dangerous. Plus, they knew we were coming, and if they know we're coming, they're not going to be down there."

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said Wednesday that the country's nuclear facilities had been "badly damaged," as quoted by the Associated Press.

Trump insisted Iran's nuclear program had been set back "basically decades," adding, "It's gone for years."

Asked if they could rebuild and whether the U.S. would strike again, Trump said that would be someone else's problem.

"I'm not going to have to worry about that," he said. "It's gone for years, years, very tough to rebuild, because the whole thing is collapsed. In other words, inside, it's all collapsed. Nobody can get in to see it, because it's collapsed."

Asked if he trusted U.S. intelligence, the president said the initial report was "very inconclusive. The intelligence says we don't know, it could have been very severe, that's what the intelligence says. So I guess that's correct, but I think we can take the 'we don't know.' It was very severe. It was obliteration."

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio also spoke in support of the president's position, having accompanied Trump to The Hague.

"Given the 30,000 lbs of explosives and capability of those munitions, it was devastation underneath Fordo," Hegseth said.

"Any assessment that tells you it was something otherwise is speculating with other motives," Hegseth continued. "And we know that because when you actually look at the report, by the way, it was a top secret report, it was preliminary, it was low confidence."

Hegseth suggested the leak of the report had "a political motive," adding, "We're doing a leak investigation with the FBI right now because this information is for internal purposes."

Rubio also claimed that the leak of the preliminary report was politically motivated, saying that the attacks led to "complete and total obliteration."

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-says-iran-nuclear-program-111558288.html
1750859147129.png
 
President Donald Trump again claimed "total obliteration" of Iran's nuclear program during the NATO summit in the Netherlands on Wednesday, dismissing an early Pentagon report suggesting the joint U.S.-Israeli strikes on Tehran's facilities may have only set its program back by a matter of months.

"I believe it was total obliteration," Trump told reporters speaking alongside NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in The Hague, Netherlands.

A preliminary analysis of the strikes by the Defense Intelligence Agency and U.S. Central Command prompted questions as the efficacy of the operation. Two people familiar with the report told ABC News it suggested the strikes did limited damage and that Iran was able to relocate highly enriched uranium stocks before the strikes occurred.

"I believe they didn't have a chance to get anything out, because we acted fast," Trump said. "If it would have taken two weeks, maybe. But it's very hard to remove that kind of material, very hard and very dangerous. Plus, they knew we were coming, and if they know we're coming, they're not going to be down there."

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said Wednesday that the country's nuclear facilities had been "badly damaged," as quoted by the Associated Press.

Trump insisted Iran's nuclear program had been set back "basically decades," adding, "It's gone for years."

Asked if they could rebuild and whether the U.S. would strike again, Trump said that would be someone else's problem.

"I'm not going to have to worry about that," he said. "It's gone for years, years, very tough to rebuild, because the whole thing is collapsed. In other words, inside, it's all collapsed. Nobody can get in to see it, because it's collapsed."

Asked if he trusted U.S. intelligence, the president said the initial report was "very inconclusive. The intelligence says we don't know, it could have been very severe, that's what the intelligence says. So I guess that's correct, but I think we can take the 'we don't know.' It was very severe. It was obliteration."

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio also spoke in support of the president's position, having accompanied Trump to The Hague.

"Given the 30,000 lbs of explosives and capability of those munitions, it was devastation underneath Fordo," Hegseth said.

"Any assessment that tells you it was something otherwise is speculating with other motives," Hegseth continued. "And we know that because when you actually look at the report, by the way, it was a top secret report, it was preliminary, it was low confidence."

Hegseth suggested the leak of the report had "a political motive," adding, "We're doing a leak investigation with the FBI right now because this information is for internal purposes."

Rubio also claimed that the leak of the preliminary report was politically motivated, saying that the attacks led to "complete and total obliteration."


https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-says-iran-nuclear-program-111558288.html
View attachment 53023
He can never admit anything but 100% for himself.
 
President Donald Trump again claimed "total obliteration" of Iran's nuclear program during the NATO summit in the Netherlands on Wednesday, dismissing an early Pentagon report suggesting the joint U.S.-Israeli strikes on Tehran's facilities may have only set its program back by a matter of months.

"I believe it was total obliteration," Trump told reporters speaking alongside NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in The Hague, Netherlands.

A preliminary analysis of the strikes by the Defense Intelligence Agency and U.S. Central Command prompted questions as the efficacy of the operation. Two people familiar with the report told ABC News it suggested the strikes did limited damage and that Iran was able to relocate highly enriched uranium stocks before the strikes occurred.

"I believe they didn't have a chance to get anything out, because we acted fast," Trump said. "If it would have taken two weeks, maybe. But it's very hard to remove that kind of material, very hard and very dangerous. Plus, they knew we were coming, and if they know we're coming, they're not going to be down there."

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said Wednesday that the country's nuclear facilities had been "badly damaged," as quoted by the Associated Press.

Trump insisted Iran's nuclear program had been set back "basically decades," adding, "It's gone for years."

Asked if they could rebuild and whether the U.S. would strike again, Trump said that would be someone else's problem.

"I'm not going to have to worry about that," he said. "It's gone for years, years, very tough to rebuild, because the whole thing is collapsed. In other words, inside, it's all collapsed. Nobody can get in to see it, because it's collapsed."

Asked if he trusted U.S. intelligence, the president said the initial report was "very inconclusive. The intelligence says we don't know, it could have been very severe, that's what the intelligence says. So I guess that's correct, but I think we can take the 'we don't know.' It was very severe. It was obliteration."

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio also spoke in support of the president's position, having accompanied Trump to The Hague.

"Given the 30,000 lbs of explosives and capability of those munitions, it was devastation underneath Fordo," Hegseth said.

"Any assessment that tells you it was something otherwise is speculating with other motives," Hegseth continued. "And we know that because when you actually look at the report, by the way, it was a top secret report, it was preliminary, it was low confidence."

Hegseth suggested the leak of the report had "a political motive," adding, "We're doing a leak investigation with the FBI right now because this information is for internal purposes."

Rubio also claimed that the leak of the preliminary report was politically motivated, saying that the attacks led to "complete and total obliteration."


https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-says-iran-nuclear-program-111558288.html
View attachment 53023
They will find and prosecute the leaker. That's classified military intel.
 
President Donald Trump again claimed "total obliteration" of Iran's nuclear program during the NATO summit in the Netherlands on Wednesday, dismissing an early Pentagon report suggesting the joint U.S.-Israeli strikes on Tehran's facilities may have only set its program back by a matter of months.

"I believe it was total obliteration," Trump told reporters speaking alongside NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in The Hague, Netherlands.

A preliminary analysis of the strikes by the Defense Intelligence Agency and U.S. Central Command prompted questions as the efficacy of the operation. Two people familiar with the report told ABC News it suggested the strikes did limited damage and that Iran was able to relocate highly enriched uranium stocks before the strikes occurred.

"I believe they didn't have a chance to get anything out, because we acted fast," Trump said. "If it would have taken two weeks, maybe. But it's very hard to remove that kind of material, very hard and very dangerous. Plus, they knew we were coming, and if they know we're coming, they're not going to be down there."

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said Wednesday that the country's nuclear facilities had been "badly damaged," as quoted by the Associated Press.

Trump insisted Iran's nuclear program had been set back "basically decades," adding, "It's gone for years."

Asked if they could rebuild and whether the U.S. would strike again, Trump said that would be someone else's problem.

"I'm not going to have to worry about that," he said. "It's gone for years, years, very tough to rebuild, because the whole thing is collapsed. In other words, inside, it's all collapsed. Nobody can get in to see it, because it's collapsed."

Asked if he trusted U.S. intelligence, the president said the initial report was "very inconclusive. The intelligence says we don't know, it could have been very severe, that's what the intelligence says. So I guess that's correct, but I think we can take the 'we don't know.' It was very severe. It was obliteration."

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio also spoke in support of the president's position, having accompanied Trump to The Hague.

"Given the 30,000 lbs of explosives and capability of those munitions, it was devastation underneath Fordo," Hegseth said.

"Any assessment that tells you it was something otherwise is speculating with other motives," Hegseth continued. "And we know that because when you actually look at the report, by the way, it was a top secret report, it was preliminary, it was low confidence."

Hegseth suggested the leak of the report had "a political motive," adding, "We're doing a leak investigation with the FBI right now because this information is for internal purposes."

Rubio also claimed that the leak of the preliminary report was politically motivated, saying that the attacks led to "complete and total obliteration."


https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-says-iran-nuclear-program-111558288.html
View attachment 53023
Fuck you asshole. You supported the assassination of your president so, fuck you!
 
Trump claims the Iranian nuclear program was set back by decades.

The U.S. Defence Intelligence Agency says the Iranian nuclear program was probably only set back by a few months.


Given Trump's long history of exaggerating and lying his ass off, I'm putting more stock in the DIA assessment.
 
Trump claims the Iranian nuclear program was set back by decades.

The U.S. Defence Intelligence Agency says the Iranian nuclear program was probably only set back by a few months.


Given Trump's long history of exaggerating and lying his ass off, I'm putting more stock in the DIA assessment.
I hope he makes that claim on camera to the leaders at the NATO meeting.
 
ORANGE MAN BAD

36ktzy.jpg
 
The question everyone should be asking is, every president since the peanut farmer has vowed that Iran should be prevented from obtaining nuclear weapons,
why are the alt lefties rooting for Iran to have such capability?
There are consequences to his impetuous actions, and then, has this really accomplished anything considering the risk to our servicemen????
 
Back
Top