NAACP says it won’t give ‘platform to fascism,’ Trump not invited to convention

Every POTUS swears an oath to uphold the Constitution and to faithfully enforce the laws of the USA.

Trump and his Admin are doing neither and we have several examples of that.

That makes him a threat to the democracy.
So, you don't know what makes Trump a threat, MSNBC just tells you and you parrot that stupid nonsense. Got it. :thumbsup:
 
So, you don't know what makes Trump a threat, MSNBC just tells you and you parrot that stupid nonsense. Got it. :thumbsup:
your idiocy does not allow you to comprehend what you read. Again Trump swore an oath to uphold the Constitution and to faithfully enforce the laws of the USA.

Trump and his Admin are doing neither and we have several examples of that.

That makes him a threat to the democracy.
 
your idiocy does not allow you to comprehend what you read. Again Trump swore an oath to uphold the Constitution and to faithfully enforce the laws of the USA.

Trump and his Admin are doing neither and we have several examples of that.

That makes him a threat to the democracy.
What is this "we" shit white man?
 
your My idiocy does not allow you to comprehend what you I read.

FIFY dumbass. :laugh:

Again Trump swore an oath to uphold the Constitution and to faithfully enforce the laws of the USA.

How has he not upheld the Constitution halfwit?

Trump and his Admin are doing neither and we have several examples of that.

Give us a few halfwit.

That makes him a threat to the democracy.

Your lack of intelligence makes you a threat to yourself halfwit. :laugh:
 
FIFY dumbass. :laugh:



How has he not upheld the Constitution halfwit?



Give us a few halfwit.



Your lack of intelligence makes you a threat to yourself halfwit. :laugh:
Lets start with one and test whether you are smart enough to proceed to the next.

I am going to assume you know that as POTUS he has to recognize that Congress makes the laws and once they do it is his job and he swears an oath to " .... faithfully uphold the laws..." of the United States. Let me know if you are so stupid you deny that.

The TikTok Ban Is Congress At Its Best

From the House Select Committee’s diligence to the revival of bipartisan cooperation, the law targeting the Chinese-entangled social network offers lessons for good lawmaking.


Above is Congress with full bipartisan supporting the ban of Tic Tok and the Supreme Court upholding the law...


Trump then takes office and flip flops after getting a bribe from a major Tik Tok shareholder...


That above is Trump giving his oath and the Constitution the middle finger as he says 'Fuck that law and the SC ruling as i am not doing it as it is no longer in my personal interest'.
 
”The president has signed unconstitutional executive orders to oppress voters and undo federal civil rights protections; he has illegally turned the military on our communities, and he continually undermines every pillar of our democracy to make himself more powerful and to personally benefit from the U.S. government,” Johnson said.

Again, Johnson provided no examples or elaborations of these accusations in his statement. He proceeded to tout what he believes is his organization’s bipartisanship and that the convention is meant to be for all people, “regardless of political ideology.” Johnson then reversed course on his words, explaining that it would be a “waste” to invite the president because doing so would be giving “a platform to fascism.”


You'll never get any examples or substance to back their mentally deranged claims.
Note how he tries to hide behind the very Constitution he despises as well.
Democracies don't even HAVE a constitution! They have no representative officers either...no president...no Congress.. no nothing. Democracy is government by popular vote.

It usually quickly dissolves into an oligarchy or dictatorship as one faction gains control. This is what the Democrats WANT.

A government by law (a constitution) is called a Republic. The United States is a federated republic (layers of constitutions, each creating a level of government). In other words, republics within republics.
 
So when I say I can limit what is said on my property, I have it backwards? Does that mean anyone can come to my house and say what they want, but I can ban what people say on other properties?
Pivot fallacy. The 1st amendment does not apply to you, Wally.
The NAACP has an absolute right to invite, or not invite, anyone they please to their convention.
Then they cancel their own argument.
 
Every POTUS swears an oath to uphold the Constitution and to faithfully enforce the laws of the USA.
And Trump has.
Trump and his Admin are doing neither and we have several examples of that.
Void argument fallacy. You have not yet shown anything.

DON'T TRY TO HIDE BEHIND THE CONSTITUTION YOU DESPISE!!!
That makes him a threat to the democracy.
What democracy??? The United States was never a democracy.
The oligarchy YOU want is not a democracy either.
 
Lets start with one and test whether you are smart enough to proceed to the next.
Good. Keep it simple.
I am going to assume you know that as POTUS he has to recognize that Congress makes the laws and once they do it is his job and he swears an oath to " .... faithfully uphold the laws..." of the United States. Let me know if you are so stupid you deny that.
Trump has done exactly that.
Above is Congress with full bipartisan supporting the ban of Tic Tok and the Supreme Court upholding the law...
The federal government has no such authority, and obviously such a ban is not possible.
Trump then takes office and flip flops after getting a bribe from a major Tik Tok shareholder...
What bribe, Kewpie????????
That above is Trump giving his oath and the Constitution the middle finger as he says 'Fuck that law and the SC ruling as i am not doing it as it is no longer in my personal interest'.
Trump is not Congress, Kewpie.

Try again. What part of the Constitution has Trump ignored?
I know what YOU ignore! Most of the Constitution!
 
Lets start with one and test whether you are smart enough to proceed to the next.

I am going to assume you know that as POTUS he has to recognize that Congress makes the laws and once they do it is his job and he swears an oath to " .... faithfully uphold the laws..." of the United States. Let me know if you are so stupid you deny that.

Yes, that is why we call it the LEGISLATURE. They LEGISLATE.

And the President is the COMMANDER and CHEIF of our military and is responsible for carrying out the laws of the land and defending our borders.

The Courts are the Judicial branch of government. They can ONLY interpret our laws, and the PRESIDENT then enforces them via the Justice Department.

Above is Congress with full bipartisan supporting the ban of Tic Tok and the Supreme Court upholding the law...
Trump then takes office and flip flops after getting a bribe from a major Tik Tok shareholder...

Now you're lying. Link to any evidence that Trump took any bribe dumbass.

That above is Trump giving his oath and the Constitution the middle finger as he says 'Fuck that law and the SC ruling as i am not doing it as it is no longer in my personal interest'.

He is not overturning anything, you brainless dumbass. He is moving the deadline in order to ensure there are no buyers that are not connected to China.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., told reporters earlier this week that "it all depends on the buyer."

"We all want a buyer that doesn't have the CCP in control of the algorithms after acquisition," he said. "So, I'm hoping that the negotiations on the buyer are making headway enough that we'll find somebody that fits the definition, but I don't think they have yet."
 
...
He is not overturning anything, you brainless dumbass. He is moving the deadline in order to ensure there are no buyers that are not connected to China.

...
Try again.

When Congress passes a law that X must happen and the SC affirms that X must happen, Trump is not following that law by saying 'I will not do it but i will grant extensions to keep operating in defiance of the law and SC ruling while i seek buyers instead'.

Trump substituted his solution which is indefinite extensions to keep operating for as long as he wants to grant them for the solution and law demanded by COngress via the law they passed.

It would be like the Court demanding you be jailed for a robbery crime but then you mom blocks it saying 'i am going to see if he pays restitution first and then we can decide'. That is not following the law because you are giving time for a another action to take place.


So once again if you cannot prove you are smart enough to proceed to the next step in the conversation you have to remain here, stuck on your stupidity.


- Do you understand that Trump took an oath to " .... faithfully uphold the laws..." of the United States and in his denial of doing so while instead saying 'i will ignore Congress law and the SC and instead allow them to operate while i seek a buyer for as long as i want to...'... and that is a breaking of oath?
 
Try again.

When Congress passes a law that X must happen and the SC affirms that X must happen, Trump is not following that law by saying 'I will not do it but i will grant extensions to keep operating in defiance of the law and SC ruling while i seek buyers instead'.

Trump substituted his solution which is indefinite extensions to keep operating for as long as he wants to grant them for the solution and law demanded by COngress via the law they passed.

Your naive, uneducated and uninformed view of how Government works has been noted. But alas, due to your severe form of TDS which is a mental disease, you're incapable of a coherent and factual argument.

It would be like the Court demanding you be jailed for a robbery crime but then you mom blocks it saying 'i am going to see if he pays restitution first and then we can decide'. That is not following the law because you are giving time for a another action to take place.

No, it would not be. But then, you are mentally unhinged and make stupid shit up as a result.

So once again if you cannot prove you are smart enough to proceed to the next step in the conversation you have to remain here, stuck on your stupidity.

I am amused that you think you are smart. :rofl2:

Do you understand that Trump took an oath to " .... faithfully uphold the laws..." of the United States and in his denial of doing so while instead saying 'i will ignore Congress law and the SC and instead allow them to operate while i seek a buyer for as long as i want to...'... and that is a breaking of oath?

Apparently you don't understand that Trump has done nothing unconstitutional and court cases are proving that every damned day.

You, being a brainless, uneducated, low IQ dumbass, lack the intelligence to comprehend the OBVIOUS.
 
Ironically, they did that when they gave Obama and Biden the platform.

Johnson didn’t specify or explain how Trump was using a “fascist playbook” or attacking democracy and civil rights. He did, however, go on to criticize Trump’s executive orders that he claimed, without any evidence, were unconstitutional, oppressed voters, and pulled back on civil rights.

Not one Democrat can specify how Trump is a fascist and acting like a dictator. They lack any evidence he is acting unconstitutionally.

You see, in the brain dead world of Marxist Socialist progressive leftists, one only need claim their opponents are bad actors and the autocrats in the DNC expect their constituents to just accept and parrot their nonsense like obedient little lemmings.

NAACP says it won’t give ‘platform to fascism,’ Trump not invited to convention

The NAACP announced that President Donald Trump is not invited to its national convention this year.

The decision was made because of the NAACP’s opinion on Trump’s policies. NAACP President Derrick Johnson accused the nation’s president of believing in a “fascist playbook” and that Trump was attacking the nation’s “democracy” and “civil rights.”
“For 116 years, the NAACP has invited the sitting president of the United States to address the NAACP National Convention — regardless of their political party,” Johnson said in a statement. “There is a rich history of both Republicans and Democrats attending our convention — from Harry Truman to Dwight D. Eisenhower, Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Barack Obama, and beyond. We’re nonpartisan and always welcome those who believe in democracy and the Constitution.”

The NAACP is an advocacy rights organization. According to its website, they are the home for “grassroots activism for civil rights and social justice.” The NAACP works to obtain the “civil rights due to Black America.”

In explaining why Trump will be the first president in over a century not to be invited to his organization’s convention, Johnson repeated a common left-wing, Democratic criticism, saying that Trump was a threat to democracy.


I'm so disappointed

:sadbaby:
 
Your naive, uneducated and uninformed view of how Government works has been noted. But alas, due to your severe form of TDS which is a mental disease, you're incapable of a coherent and factual argument.



No, it would not be. But then, you are mentally unhinged and make stupid shit up as a result.



I am amused that you think you are smart. :rofl2:



Apparently you don't understand that Trump has done nothing unconstitutional and court cases are proving that every damned day.

You, being a brainless, uneducated, low IQ dumbass, lack the intelligence to comprehend the OBVIOUS.
Ok so proof positive and you fail and cannot pass Step 1 and thus no need to try and engage with you beyond that on this question.

Yes, in fact when Congress passes a law with clear bypartisan support and the SC affirms the law, then the POTUS who was just sworn in has one job with regards to that, and that is to " .... faithfully uphold the laws..." of the United States.

Trump is not upholding the laws of the US by saying 'I am not going to shut it down as the law and SC demanded and instead will leave it open and running as long as i chose to while i seek a buyer for it'.


Those things are NOT the same. Trump has thrown the Congress and SC solution to TikTok and instead substituted his own and that IS NOT " .... faithfully uphold the laws..." of the United States.
 
Every POTUS swears an oath to uphold the Constitution and to faithfully enforce the laws of the USA.

Trump and his Admin are doing neither and we have several examples of that.

That makes him a threat to the democracy.
Oh right and when you toads had a chance to prevent him from taking over you did nothing. Why do you hate democracy and America so much?
 
Oh right and when you toads had a chance to prevent him from taking over you did nothing. Why do you hate democracy and America so much?
The ones who hate democracy and America are Magats and Trump.

YOu cannot find a thing they like about America and do not want to change. They want a king and not democracy. They want a police state with arrests and no habeas. They want to use government to end free speech in Universities and law firms. And we can list more things that they hate about America then they like.

Since WW2 America, due in the largest part to Free Trade, became the sole world super power and accumulated the most wealth compared to all other nations and yet Trump and magats cry only about being victim and taken advantage of.

It is a shocking lack of self awareness that can only be explained by stupidity.
 
Back
Top