Israel is Panicking

IBDaMann said:
Nope. Not only is this a totally absurd statement (which is why you refuse to provide any images),
Click to expand...
The images you're referring to, of the fighters wearing al Qassam headbands, would show/prove nothing. YOU need to prove that al Qassam is not Hamas' military, which you've yet to do despite repeated requests.
IBDaMann said:
you haven't provided any shred of support for your claim.
Click to expand...
I've provided multiple links.
IBDaMann said:
You seem to think that your mere declaration that it is so, is somehow enough to make it so. Not even ZenMode would fall for that crap.
Click to expand...
I've provided links. You've provided nothing.
 
cropped2763470500198362455.jpg
 
ZenMode said:
The images you're referring to, of the fighters wearing al Qassam headbands, would show/prove nothing.
Click to expand...
Yes. It proves everything. Al Qassam is Iran's well funded militant proxy that wears uniforms, and is separate from Gaza's administrators who are civilians and who have neither money nor weapons. You are going to show, not declare, that there is an affiliation. Bring it on.

Links to others who simply declare an affiliation are not support.

ZenMode said:
YOU need to prove that al Qassam is not Hamas' military,
Click to expand...
Nope. You need to prove that they are. It's your claim. It's also an absurd claim. Al Qassam was created by Iran to serve the Ayatollah while Hamas was Gaza's "Red Cross," a charitable organization that became a political party, with no affiliation to Iran or Al Qassam.

... but you insist affirmatively that there is an affiliation, and that you are going to clearly show it beyond simply declaring that it is such. OK. I'm watching. The floor is yours.

ZenMode said:
I've provided multiple links.
Click to expand...
... to people who simply declare mistakenly the same thing. You need to provide verifiable support otherwise your absurd assertion is discarded.
 
IBDaMann said:
Yes. It proves everything. Al Qassam is Iran's well funded militant proxy that wears uniforms, and is separate from Gaza's administrators who are civilians and who have neither money nor weapons. You are going to show, not declare, that there is an affiliation. Bring it on.

Links to others who simply declare an affiliation are not support.


Nope. You need to prove that they are. It's your claim. It's also an absurd claim. Al Qassam was created by Iran to serve the Ayatollah while Hamas was Gaza's "Red Cross," a charitable organization that became a political party, with no affiliation to Iran or Al Qassam.

... but you insist affirmatively that there is an affiliation, and that you are going to clearly show it beyond simply declaring that it is such. OK. I'm watching. The floor is yours.


... to people who simply declare mistakenly the same thing. You need to provide verifiable support otherwise your absurd assertion is discarded.
Click to expand...
You are still locked in these paradoxes, IBD. You are going to have to decide one way or the other.
 
IBDaMann said:
Yes. It proves everything. Al Qassam is Iran's well funded militant proxy that wears uniforms, and is separate from Gaza's administrators who are civilians and who have neither money nor weapons. You are going to show, not declare, that there is an affiliation. Bring it on.

Links to others who simply declare an affiliation are not support.


Nope. You need to prove that they are. It's your claim. It's also an absurd claim. Al Qassam was created by Iran to serve the Ayatollah while Hamas was Gaza's "Red Cross," a charitable organization that became a political party, with no affiliation to Iran or Al Qassam.

... but you insist affirmatively that there is an affiliation, and that you are going to clearly show it beyond simply declaring that it is such. OK. I'm watching. The floor is yours.


... to people who simply declare mistakenly the same thing. You need to provide verifiable support otherwise your absurd assertion is discarded.
Click to expand...
". to people who simply declare mistakenly the same thing. You need to provide verifiable support otherwise your absurd assertion is discarded"

I've provided sources . You've provided nothing, so until you provide something beyond apparently pulling it out of your ass, your words mean absolutely nothing.
 
Into the Night said:
You are still locked in the paradox, IBD.
Click to expand...
You are still on the wrong side of this issue. You are still supporting genocide. You are supporting submitting the sovereignty of the United States to the will of the government of Israel. You are supporting the US going to war against countries that are no threat to us, on behalf of Israel, at taxpayer expense.
 
IBDaMann said:
That's not support.


I've provided you the correct answers and a rejection of your absurd dishonesty.
Click to expand...
You've provided me your opinion which obviously means nothing when there are multiple sources, including foreign governments, saying you're wrong.

So, again.....what is your source?
 
IBDaMann said:
You are still on the wrong side of this issue. You are still supporting genocide. You are supporting submitting the sovereignty of the United States to the will of the government of Israel. You are supporting the US going to war against countries that are no threat to us, on behalf of Israel, at taxpayer expense.
Click to expand...
There is no genocide, IBD. Israel is not the United States.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top