For forum member who have no idea what fascism means:

"Fears of a wider war were growing on Tuesday after President Trump called for Iran’s “unconditional surrender,” cited the possibility of killing Iran’s supreme leader and referred to Israel’s war efforts with the word “we” — all apparent suggestions that the United States could enter the war against Iran.
 
I cannot stress this enough, we do not want their unconditional surrender. We do not want to have to occupy Iran. There is no one else who wants to occupy Iran... Other than the Iranians, of course.
 
Hume said:
"Fears of a wider war were growing on Tuesday after President Trump called for Iran’s “unconditional surrender,” cited the possibility of killing Iran’s supreme leader and referred to Israel’s war efforts with the word “we” — all apparent suggestions that the United States could enter the war against Iran.
Click to expand...
It is possible. They seem not to want to and to want to at the same time. If we do, it should be limited to the bunker busters.
 
Walt said:
I cannot stress this enough, we do not want their unconditional surrender. We do not want to have to occupy Iran. There is no one else who wants to occupy Iran... Other than the Iranians, of course.
Click to expand...
We don't need to occupy iran to bomb the shit out of it.
 
Phantasmal said:
This type of bomb would have to be delivered by USA military aircraft, it would be a great mistake and directly involve us in the hostilities.
Click to expand...
Yup. Hence the hemming and the hawing. Involving the US in the Middle East is something that Trump wants to avoid. He spent his first campaign system telling Bush how stupid his brother was for going there.

But if they want to stop them from getting the bomb... you may see limited action in Iran. There is no reason to have 60% enriched Uranium other than to be closer to the 90% they would need to reach to create the most effective bomb.
 
Damocles said:
Yup. Hence the hemming and the hawing. Involving the US in the Middle East is something that Trump wants to avoid. He spent his first campaign system telling Bush how stupid his brother was for going there.

But if they want to stop them from getting the bomb... you may see limited action in Iran. There is no reason to have 60% enriched Uranium other than to be closer to the 90% they would need to reach to create the most effective bomb.
Click to expand...
if this is something presidents get to decide all by themselves, sign me up for the no kings protest next go round
 
Damocles said:
Yup. Hence the hemming and the hawing. Involving the US in the Middle East is something that Trump wants to avoid. He spent his first campaign system telling Bush how stupid his brother was for going there.

But if they want to stop them from getting the bomb... you may see limited action in Iran. There is no reason to have 60% enriched Uranium other than to be closer to the 90% they would need to reach to create the most effective bomb.
Click to expand...
If we attack them, it will guarantee 90% enrichment at some point.
 
zymurgy said:
if this is something presidents get to decide all by themselves, sign me up for the no kings protest next go round
Click to expand...
You should read that constitution thing sometime, and the War Powers Resolution of 1973. This isn't a new thing. Obama used it to drone attack people in other countries.
 
Damocles said:
You should read that constitution thing sometime, and the War Powers Resolution of 1973. This isn't a new thing. Obama used it to drone attack people in other countries.
Click to expand...


Obama did it. so it's ok. derp derp derpity derp

you should read an intro course to logic sometime
 
zymurgy said:
Obama did it. so it's ok. derp derp derpity derp

you should read an intro course to logic sometime
Click to expand...
I didn't say that, you need reading comprehension classes.

What I said is that there is this law, and with it and the constitution together it allows this, then gave you an example of another President that has used it.
 
martin said:
Exactly where in The Constitution, would that be?
Click to expand...
It would be in the CIC portion which is cited in the War Powers Resolution. Read the things, the Constitution isn't so long that you shouldn't have most of it memorized by now, the Resolution is available for you to read as well. It is why I referenced them, so your stupid questions could be resolved with minimal research involved.
 
Damocles said:
I didn't say that, you need reading comprehension classesa.

What I said is that there is this law, and with it and the constitution together it allows this, then gave you an example of another President that has used it.
Click to expand...
Common sense, law and logic always confuses the left.
 
Damocles said:
I didn't say that, you need reading comprehension classes.

What I said is that there is this law, and with it and the constitution together it allows this, then gave you an example of another President that has used it.
Click to expand...
you are just another shit stain apoligist for this nonsense

so how long have we had concerns about the 60% enrichment?

but we need a king to make the call - we had no time to do it in a more thoughtful way. you shit stains are always cool with this. every fucking time

I can't say fuck you in a more clear tone. you are a phony and the problem. all the prior months of pretending to be somethign you are not - out the window the first time the king says to be scared

just as you all rolled over during covid you will again

lather.rinse.repeat
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top