real racism

Ice Dancer said:
White American's do have a culture that is all their own and IF black American's can specify their culture and it is not being racist then the same standard should apply to a white American cultural specificity. We have our own music, food, literature and ancestry.
Click to expand...

Examples?

So, then why are you denying that to blacks?
 
AssHatZombie said:
I'd say there is a white culture, characterized by technological advanceness, and khaki shorts.
Click to expand...

So then we should assume you are complaining about black cultural offerings because....

A) You are a little bitch.
B) You are a racist.

... What else could it be?

Is this white culture you speak of inherently racist?
 
AssHatZombie said:
They can have a race based club at home. No race clubs with public money. That's the rule.
Click to expand...

I don't disagree with that, so long as you are not going to give us some stupid definition of public money which pretends it is overly pervasive. You are not going to tell us they can't use roads, are you?
 
bravo said:
ADVICE WORTH REPEATING

Might as well save your fingers Folks........talking rationally to ignorant, brain impaired, racist pinheads like RS, TC, Cypress, etc. is just a waste of time....

they're amusing, to a degree, for a limited period of time, but the entertainment wears off pretty fast....

Racists that don't realize they are racists ?...wow...the degree of rationalization and the depth they can force their heads up their asses is not to be underestimated
Click to expand...
.
 
Southern Man said:
You're not doing well at this. :(
Click to expand...

You are not doing well at this. The difference is that Bravo's is an actual ad hom. The comment of soc's to which I was responding was not. That was part of the joke that was obviously going to be lost on you.

Saying, your argument is stupid therefore it is wrong, is not an ad hom. Saying, you are stupid therefore your argument is wrong, is.

Now if soc had just said, "your argument is stupid therefore it is wrong" then, though he would not have been making an ad hom, it would still be unresponsive as it would offer nothing to support the assertion. Kind of like when you say...

"So? legalization will still reward the cartels."

... which is exactly to what soc was responding and you offered nothing more. But soc added more than just an insult and offered support for his assertion that your argument is stupid.

You can call me as many names as you like, but at least put a point in there somehwere.
 
You're right sonny.... that crack about "using the roads", revealed your underwhelming intelligence....I was too astounded to even make a comment....
I thought the highlight of the debate was gonna be your remarks about the ethnic food aisles, but you've outdone yourself....

I admit I'll never be as smart as you in this lifetime, at least I pray to God I won't....
If I learned anything from trading posts with you, its why there was even a need for a club like the "Lunch Brunch" in that school....racist, bigotry and stupidity must be a cultural thing with you...

I even have more respect for a peckerhead like TC...you make him look like a genius....
 
Last edited:
RStringfield said:
You are not doing well at this. The difference is that Bravo's is an actual ad hom. The comment of soc's to which I was responding was not. That was part of the joke that was obviously going to be lost on you.

Saying, your argument is stupid therefore it is wrong, is not an ad hom. Saying, you are stupid therefore your argument is wrong, is.

Now if soc had just said, "your argument is stupid therefore it is wrong" then, though he would not have been making an ad hom, it would still be unresponsive as it would offer nothing to support the assertion. Kind of like when you say...

"So? legalization will still reward the cartels."

... which is exactly to what soc was responding and you offered nothing more. But soc added more than just an insult and offered support for his assertion that your argument is stupid.

You can call me as many names as you like, but at least put a point in there somehwere.
Click to expand...
translation:
beep bop boop beep bop beep bop boop beep bop beep bop beep bop boop beep bop boop beep bop beep bop boop beep bop beep bop beep bop boop
Click to expand...
 
RStringfield said:
You are not doing well at this. The difference is that Bravo's is an actual ad hom. The comment of soc's to which I was responding was not. That was part of the joke that was obviously going to be lost on you.
Click to expand...
Oh now its a joke, after I pointed out that you were wrong. :cof1:
 
bravo said:
You're right sonny.... that crack about "using the roads", revealed your underwhelming intelligence....I was too astounded to even make a comment....
Click to expand...

I am guessing you misunderstood then. Cypress, basically argues (i.e., this is paraphrased) that all economic transactions are PUBLIC because the government provides the roads and some other silly bullshit. I was wondering if Asshat was using that same sort of all prevasive definition of PUBLIC in saying, "no race clubs with PUBLIC money." If he is he's just saying, "no race clubs."
 
RStringfield said:
Their test scores failed as a group when the group was defined by race. They were singled out by race. Singling them out by test scores would include all and only those that are failing, regardless of race.
Click to expand...

No, you're not reading this right. According to the article, the test scores showed that the black kids were underperformining as a whole....no one "singled them out" until AFTER the scores were tallied. It's simple logic based on the evidence.....that you had a common racial factor just happen to be the case here...on another level it could have been regional or gender. When test scores show girls doing better than boys at math, no one screams "reverse sexism"....they'd just address the problem.

In this case, the principal just made the wrong choice...not out of malice, mind you, as the final ruling indicated.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top