"You have no say in this at all" - Stephen Miller

[Into the Night]

Care to elaborate on what paradoxical statements you believe I am making?

Already stated. You cannot clear your paradoxes by denying them.

 

[Into the Night]

No word games, just pointing out that some questions can't adequately be answered with a yes or no.

Your word games won't work, Scott. You cannot clear your paradoxes by denying them.

 

[Into the Night]

We may have to agree to disagree on this one.


Or blown to smithereens by a ray gun . For those who may not understand why I just said that, please see the video in the nested quotes above. What to do with human beings who have migrated to the U.S. illegally is a much more complicated problem.

You are disagreeing with yourself. You are still locked in your three paradoxes.

 

[Scott]

Why do you support rioting, arson, looting [snip]

The questions a person asks and the language they use to describe people can say a lot about a person. Anyway, here's my answer to your 6 questions:
1, 2 and 3- Rioting, arson and looting- No, I don't. However, I think it's understandable that some might turn to these things if they feel that the law is lacking in justice. I've also seen plenty of evidence of false flag operations in things a bit of rioting and property damage, so like others here, I don't rule out that at least some of these things weren't actually done by people who had a beef with the ICE raids and any subsequence law enforcement response.

Paradox. Irrational. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox. Which is it, dude??

When it came to your first 3 questions, my initial response was actually pretty clear- can't get much clearer than "No, I don't". It seems that you didn't like what I had to say -after- that, without getting into any details as to why you didn't like the following sentences.

Denying your paradoxes won't clear them. Which is it, dude??

Care to elaborate on what paradoxical statements you believe I am making?

Already stated. You cannot clear your paradoxes by denying them.

No, your main buzzword is some variation of paradox. If you don't explain what you find paradoxical in my statements, all you've got is said buzzword.

 

[Into the Night]

No, your main buzzword is some variation of paradox. If you don't explain what you find paradoxical in my statements, all you've got is said buzzword.

Random words. No apparent coherency. You cannot clear your paradoxes by denying them or playing word games.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Forcing action on others is nationalizing, we cede way too much power to the Federal government through their bribe systems.

Calling it "standards" and saying it doesn't matter to you because you think you like those standards just means you have no ability to object when other "standards" that you dislike are demanded when the "other side" gains power. Political laws of 2 party systems, every action you take can be taken by the other side in a way you will not like.

Damo, even this forum has rules. Why not rules IRL?

While I dislike the current state of both parties, the fact remains Congress holds the greatest power since they hold the purse strings. NOTHING happens in this country without funding. The fact the 50 states each keep electing the same losers to Congress is why we are a Republic, not a MAGAt dictatorship as many on this forum seem to prefer.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

No, your main buzzword is some variation of paradox. If you don't explain what you find paradoxical in my statements, all you've got is said buzzword.

Sybil is cray-cray. Have you ever been to his faux forum? Check both it and the usernames out for clues. https://politiplex.freeforums.net/

 

[Into the Night]

No, your main buzzword is some variation of paradox. If you don't explain what you find paradoxical in my statements, all you've got is said buzzword.

RQAA. You cannot clear your paradox by denying it.

 

[Into the Night]

Sybil is cray-cray. Have you ever been to his faux forum? Check both it and the usernames out for clues. https://politiplex.freeforums.net/

You don't own politiplex, Sybil.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

You don't own politiplex, Sybil.

Random words. No apparent coherency.

 

[Scott]

Already stated. You cannot clear your paradoxes by denying them.

No, your main buzzword is some variation of paradox. If you don't explain what you find paradoxical in my statements, all you've got is said buzzword.

Sybil is cray-cray.

I'd say it's more that he gets lost in his buzzwords when he disagrees with someone.

Have you ever been to his faux forum? Check both it and the usernames out for clues. https://politiplex.freeforums.net/

I had seen it before, perhaps because you'd linked to it before. I know from experience that it's hard to get an online forum going, so I'll give him props for getting a few hundred posts. It's no JustPlainPolitics though.

 

[FastLane]

Ofcourse the mayor has a say- if he didn't, Miller would have nothing to respond to. As to what will happen in terms of immigrants in Los Angeles, that's another matter, but unless the law is changed, Trump will leave the post in less than 2 1/2 years and we'll see what happens at that point.

Moron, Karen Bass is a female. Why would Trump leave the Oval Office a year early?