What happened to States Rights?

[Hawkeye10]

It was rubbed out by the authoritarian self appointed overlords who are out to enslave the masses just as has happened with European national sovereignty.

There will be no dissent, only compliance.

 

[Into the Night]

Are you saying that there are not leftists who are hypocritical on the issue? All leftists are 1000% states rights people?

Are you claiming that they hypocrisy on this issue is 100% limited to supporters of President Donald J Trump?

Democrats have already demonstrated that they don't want the States to have any rights at all. This constant posing by them is tiresome.

 

[Into the Night]

It is pathetic what you have done to yourself.

I don't support slavery, Wally. YOU DO.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

How did they take away basic human rights to be free from slavery? By having slaves. I would think that would be clear.

that's judging the founders based on current ideals. A ridiculous and ludicrous position. try again.

 

[Walt]

that's judging the founders based on current ideals. A ridiculous and ludicrous position. try again.

I am judging the idea that states' rights supersede human rights based on current ideas. That is very reasonable.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

I am judging the idea that states' rights supersede human rights based on current ideas. That is very reasonable.

and if this were pre 14th Amendment, you might be right. But it isn't, so you're wrong.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Blatant lie. You hate them.

LIF. Grow up.

 

[Yakuda]

It doesn't. The Dept of Education is unconstitutional.

But the unicorn lawyer there thinks because Congress used legal means to create the dept of education then the Dept of education must be constitutional.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

But the unicorn lawyer there thinks because Congress used legal means to create the dept of education then the Dept of education must be constitutional.

What does Trump's SCOTUS say about it?

 

[Into the Night]

that's judging the founders based on current ideals. A ridiculous and ludicrous position. try again.

Agreed. Wally committed what is called a 'presentism fallacy', which is to impose present day ideals or idioms on yesterday.
He's also a liar. Wally, like other Democrats, WANTS slavery.

 

[Into the Night]

I am judging the idea that states' rights supersede human rights based on current ideas. That is very reasonable.

You don't get to speak for anyone else but you, Wally. Mantra 40a. Omniscience fallacy.

 

[Truth Detector]

Trump threatens Gavin Newsom with unprecedented punishment

Donald Trump is savaging California Gov. Gavin Newsom and threatening fines against the liberal state as he ramps up the war against transgender athletes.

www.dailymail.co.uk

First off, you're quoting a known leftist source that makes patently false and stupid claims.

As for State's rights; do states have a Constitutional right to Federal funding? Yes or no? If yes, where is it in the Constitution?

 

[Jarod]

First off, you're quoting a known leftist source that makes patently false and stupid claims.

As for State's rights; do states have a Constitutional right to Federal funding? Yes or no? If yes, where is it in the Constitution?

When Congress appropriates money to California, they have a right to it.

 

[Into the Night]

and if this were pre 14th Amendment, you might be right. But it isn't, so you're wrong.

The 14th amendment does not concern State's rights. The 17th amendment did though. I would like to see the 17th amendment repealed, and have State legislators represented in Congress again. That IS the purpose of the Senate, after all (well, it WAS).

 

[Truth Detector]

Correct. Now, will you admit that the very LAST thing MAGAts want is State's Rights? Feel free to run from the question if you know I'm right.

Right after you prove that Trump supporters don't support States rights. Dunce.

 

[Into the Night]

When Congress appropriates money to California, they have a right to it.

No, they don't, Pretender.

 

[Into the Night]

You can't laugh your way out of your problems, Pretender.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

The 14th amendment does not concern State's rights. The 17th amendment did though. I would like to see the 17th amendment repealed, and have State legislators represented in Congress again. That IS the purpose of the Senate, after all (well, it WAS).

my claim to pre 14th Amendment had more to do with the 13th Amendment, recognizing blacks as people, not property (slaves)

 

[Jarod]

What about recognizing former slaves as citizens, and anyone else born here?

 

[Dutch Uncle]

What about recognizing former slaves as citizens, and anyone else born here?

MAGAts feel they have the right to edit the Constitution to their own liking....which is always to keep themselves on top and everyone else beneath them as second-class citizens.