Pit bull shot and killed in a neighborhood by ACO

  • Thread starter Thread starter WinterBorn
  • Start date Start date
W

WinterBorn

Guest
Pit bulls should be banned. I'm sure not all are bad but they are bred for fighting and have a tendency to attack. I hear about maulings by pit bulls all the time.
 
Pit bulls should be banned. I'm sure not all are bad but they are bred for fighting and have a tendency to attack. I hear about maulings by pit bulls all the time.

All the time, huh? And these constitute a significant percentage of the pit bulls out there?

If the dog dangerous because they were bred for fighting? Or are the dangerous dogs taught to be aggressive?

I have owned one and know numerous other pits, and have never been shown any aggression by them.

Chihuahuas are more aggressive by a long shot.
 
A well trained pit bull is just fine. They aren't natural maulers, it's just that they have that reputation, so anyone who wants to buy an aggressive dog buys a pit bull and trains them to be one. Banning pit bulls would be an atrocity and would just shift these bad owners onto other dogs, saving zero lives, taking millions in the process.
 
Last edited:
A well trained pit bull is just fine. They are natural maulers, it's just that they have that reputation, so anyone who wants to buy an aggressive dog buys a pit bull and trains them to be one. Banning pit bulls would be an atrocity and would just shift these bad owners onto other dogs, saving zero lives, taking millions in the process.

I totally disagree. Banning pitbulls would save more kids and people from being mauled and losing arms and legs. This level of damage has not been done by any other breed of dog.

Dobermans were also known to be out of control but nothing in comparison to the damage inflicted by the lock jaw of a pit bull.

The owner should have had adequate fencing to contain the dogs. Not to mention they should be muzzled in public. And future sales of pit bulls and breeding should be illegal.
 
All the time, huh? And these constitute a significant percentage of the pit bulls out there?

If the dog dangerous because they were bred for fighting? Or are the dangerous dogs taught to be aggressive?

I have owned one and know numerous other pits, and have never been shown any aggression by them.

are more aggressive by a long shot.

Yes. ALL too often. Even a few months ago my friend was walking threw the park and got jumped by a pit bull.Lucky he was wearing 4 articles of clothing(it was cold) and the dog was unable to pierce his skin but he did leave marks.

Really? How many incidents of Chihuahuas mauling people?

Now lets talk about how many family pets(like Chihuahuas) that pit bulls have killed? Even though that is traumatizing(for the pet owners) I am more concerned about the people they maul and handicap.

Yes the main problem is they are taught to be aggressive, though not towards other animals.

Most of the people I know that own pit bulls are drug dealers. So they have protection and dont get robbed.Plus they fight them.

Why would any one want a pitbull as opposed to a more safe dog? What bis your excuse for insisting to own pitbulls if not for fighting them?

You seem to be a breeder and this is affecting your bread and butter and this is why you are biased.
 
It's actually a myth that pit bulls have specially powerful jaws.

I've seen what pitbulls can do with their jaws. Once they clamp down, the only way to make them let go is to squirt water up their nose. Or carry a stick to try to pry them open(make sure they dont clamp on your hand). Like I said. The damage inflicted by pit bulls is not seen in any other breed of dog.
 
A well trained pit bull is just fine. They aren't natural maulers, it's just that they have that reputation, so anyone who wants to buy an aggressive dog buys a pit bull and trains them to be one. Banning pit bulls would be an atrocity and would just shift these bad owners onto other dogs, saving zero lives, taking millions in the process.

I'm with you it's in the hands of the owners. Whether if it's a pit bull or another breed with a bad owner dogs can be dangerous.
 
Yes. ALL too often. Even a few months ago my friend was walking threw the park and got jumped by a pit bull.Lucky he was wearing 4 articles of clothing(it was cold) and the dog was unable to pierce his skin but he did leave marks.

Really? How many incidents of Chihuahuas mauling people?

Now lets talk about how many family pets(like Chihuahuas) that pit bulls have killed? Even though that is traumatizing(for the pet owners) I am more concerned about the people they maul and handicap.

Yes the main problem is they are taught to be aggressive, though not towards other animals.

Most of the people I know that own pit bulls are drug dealers. So they have protection and dont get robbed.Plus they fight them.

Why would any one want a pitbull as opposed to a more safe dog? What bis your excuse for insisting to own pitbulls if not for fighting them?

You seem to be a breeder and this is affecting your bread and butter and this is why you are biased.

Kinda gone off the deep end, haven't you? I said I owned one and have known many, and you now you accuse me of being a breeder?


The point of this all is not whether pit bulls are actually dangerous, but the horrendous acts of the ACO in a residential neighborhood.
 
Pit bulls should be banned. I'm sure not all are bad but they are bred for fighting and have a tendency to attack. I hear about maulings by pit bulls all the time.
Not true. The American Pit Bull Terrier, while bred for fighting, are some of the least human aggressive dogs around. They are less likely to bite then a whole slew of dogs. They also do better on the American Temperament Test than most other dogs, with an 85.3% pass rate. That is better than the Australian Shepherd the Beagle, Border Collie, the Cocker Spaniel and the Chow Chow just to name few. The only reason you hear about Pit Bull attacks is when they do attack a human the attack is much more damaging. But the few attacks that take place every year do not mandate a banning of the entire breed.

A fact that I am not particularly proud of some 17 years later is that I used to participate in dog fighting. If Pit Bulls were human aggressive there would be problems in the pit. Two handlers are in the pit while the dogs fight. When a dog scratched, it was the handlers job to reach in and separate the dogs and take them back to their side. The dog that scratched was then let go and if he crossed the halfway point the fight continued. Never once did a dog cross the line and go after a handler, they ALWAYS went back after the dog. IF they had gone after the handler, the fight would have been over and the dog put down. Most dogs that fought were owned by families. I saw fighting dogs come to the match in the backseat of a car with children.

The following is from the ATTS website at http://www.atts.org/temperament.html

The ATTS test focuses on and measures different aspects of temperament such as stability, shyness, aggressiveness, and friendliness as well as the dog's instinct for protectiveness towards its handler and/or self-preservation in the face of a threat. The test is designed for the betterment of all breeds of dogs and takes into consideration each breed's inherent tendencies.

The test simulates a casual walk through the park or neighborhood where everyday life situations are encountered. During this walk, the dog experiences visual, auditory and tactile stimuli. Neutral, friendly and threatening situations are encountered, calling into play the dog's ability to distinguish between non-threatening situations and those calling for watchful and protective reactions.
 
I'm with you it's in the hands of the owners. Whether if it's a pit bull or another breed with a bad owner dogs can be dangerous.

Really? Name another breed that has done more damage than a pit bull. When my friend got attacked, he reported it to the police and the police came armed with a shotgun and said he would kill it on site and that those dogs are the most vicious breed and has seen numerous cases of what the dogs have done.
 
Yes. ALL too often. Even a few months ago my friend was walking threw the park and got jumped by a pit bull.Lucky he was wearing 4 articles of clothing(it was cold) and the dog was unable to pierce his skin but he did leave marks.

Really? How many incidents of Chihuahuas mauling people?

Now lets talk about how many family pets(like Chihuahuas) that pit bulls have killed? Even though that is traumatizing(for the pet owners) I am more concerned about the people they maul and handicap.

Yes the main problem is they are taught to be aggressive, though not towards other animals.

Most of the people I know that own pit bulls are drug dealers. So they have protection and dont get robbed.Plus they fight them.

Why would any one want a pitbull as opposed to a more safe dog? What bis your excuse for insisting to own pitbulls if not for fighting them?

You seem to be a breeder and this is affecting your bread and butter and this is why you are biased.
You know absolutely nothing about the breed. I have in the passed bred them. They are loyal, friendly dogs. They are known as the clown of the dog world. While harder to train for things like obedience and agility, one trained they don't forget.

Pits are inherently much more animal aggressive than human aggressive. They were bred for fighting Bulls and Bears at first and then when Bull and Bear baiting was outlawed, the dogs were bred to fight one another. Most people who own Pits are NOT drug dealers, if that were the case there would definitely be a drug dealer problem. Most pits bread for sale to the public today contain no game lines in their pedigree unless you go back 5 or 6 generations.

If Pit Bulls were banned the guys that misuse the bread would turn to breeds like Rottweilers, Brasilleros, Pressa Canarios etc. The breed choice of assholes would just change.
 
Really? Name another breed that has done more damage than a pit bull. When my friend got attacked, he reported it to the police and the police came armed with a shotgun and said he would kill it on site and that those dogs are the most vicious breed and has seen numerous cases of what the dogs have done.

So any pit bull seen loose should be shot on sight?
 
:good4u:
Kinda gone off the deep end, haven't you? I said I owned one and have known many, and you now you accuse me of being a breeder?


The point of this all is not whether pit bulls are actually dangerous, but the horrendous acts of the ACO in a residential neighborhood.

Nope. I'm still treading in familiar waters. Have you ever sold any pups?

The point is out of all the breeds they ARE the most dangerous. Known fact!

If you know a more dangerous breed, please enlighten me.

I'd rather shoot an ANIMAL than risk a PERSON being mauled.

You dog lovers are too much.
 
Back
Top