House Republicans unveil Medicaid cuts House Republicans have unveiled the cost-saving centerpiece of President Donald Trump’s “big, beautiful bill.”

Magats_Love_NHB

Let It Burn!

WASHINGTON -- House Republicans unveiled the cost-saving centerpiece of President Donald Trump'sbig, beautiful bill ” late Sunday, at least $880 billion in cuts largely to Medicaid to help cover the cost of $4.5 trillion in tax breaks.

Tallying hundreds of pages, the legislation is touching off the biggest political fight over health care since Republicans tried to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, during Trump's first term in 2017 — which ended in failure.

While Republicans insist they are simply rooting out “waste, fraud and abuse” to generate savings with new work and eligibility requirements, Democrats warn that millions of Americans will lose coverage. A preliminary estimate from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said the proposals would reduce the number of people with health care by 8.6 million over the decade.

“Savings like these allow us to use this bill to renew the Trump tax cuts and keep Republicans’ promise to hardworking middle-class families,” said Rep. Brett Guthrie of Kentucky, the GOP chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee, which handles health care spending.

But Democrats said the cuts are “shameful” and essentially amount to another attempt to repeal Obamacare.


“In no uncertain terms, millions of Americans will lose their health care coverage," said Rep. Frank Pallone of New Jersey, the top Democrat on the panel. He said "hospitals will close, seniors will not be able to access the care they need, and premiums will rise for millions of people if this bill passes."

As Republicans race toward House Speaker Mike Johnson's Memorial Day deadline to pass Trump's big bill of tax breaks and spending cuts, they are preparing to flood the zone with round-the-clock public hearings this week on various sections before they are stitched together in what will become a massive package.

The politics ahead are uncertain. More than a dozen House Republicans have told Johnson and GOP leaders they will not support cuts to the health care safety net programs that residents back home depend on. Trump himself has shied away from a repeat of his first term, vowing there will be no cuts to Medicaid.

All told, 11 committees in the House have been compiling their sections of the package as Republicans seek at least $1.5 trillion in savings to help cover the cost of preserving the 2017 tax breaks, which were approved during Trump’s first term and are expiring at the end of the year.

But the powerful Energy and Commerce Committee has been among the most watched. The committee was instructed to come up with $880 billion in savings and reached that goal, primarily with the health care cuts, but also by rolling back Biden-era green energy programs. The preliminary CBO analysis said the committee's proposals would reduce the deficit by $912 billion over the decade — with at least $715 billion coming from the health provisions.


Central to the savings are changes to Medicaid, which provides almost free health care to more than 70 million Americans, and the Affordable Care Act, which has expanded in the 15 years since it was first approved to cover millions more.

To be eligible for Medicaid, there would be new “community engagement requirements” of at least 80 hours per month of work, education or service for able-bodied adults without dependents. People would also have to verify their eligibility to be in the program twice a year, rather than just once.

This is likely to lead to more churn in the program and present hurdles for people to stay covered, especially if they have to drive far to a local benefits office to verify their income in person. But Republicans say it’ll ensure that the program is administered to those who qualify for it.

Many states have expanded their Medicaid rosters thanks to federal incentives, but the legislation would cut a 5% boost that was put in place during the COVID-19 pandemic. Federal funding to the states for immigrants who have not shown proof of citizenship would be prohibited.

There would be a freeze on the so-called provider tax that some states use to help pay for large portions of their Medicaid programs. The extra tax often leads to higher payments from the federal government, which critics say is a loophole that creates abuse in the system.


The energy portions of the legislation run far fewer pages, but include rollbacks of climate-change strategies President Joe Biden signed into law in the Inflation Reduction Act.

It proposes rescinding funds for a range of energy loans and investment programs while providing expedited permitting for natural gas development and oil pipelines.
 
So hateful!

7kcs3s.jpg
 
QUOTE="Yakuda, post: 6483071, member: 8201"]
I couldn't agree more. But expecting a hateful person not to hate is like expecting a pig not to oink.
[/QUOTE]
She'll come around... We've got to encourage her to read the link so that she's not confused...
 
She'll come around... We've got to encourage her to read the link so that she's not confused...
I'm not sure it can read
 
  • Republicans eye significant cuts to health program that covers 71 million Americans
  • Considering work requirements, excluding immigrants, reducing federal share of costs
  • Supporters for the Obamacare Medicaid expansion say it has led to the lowest uninsured rate in U.S. history
WASHINGTON, May 8 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump's fellow Republicans in the U.S. Congress are weighing steep cuts to the Medicaid health program as part of a wide-ranging budget package that also would cut taxes and raise spending on defense and border security.
That could lead to dramatic changes for one of the biggest U.S. safety-net programs, which provides coverage to 71 million low-income people, according to government figures. Here are some options being considered by Republicans on the House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee:
Keep up with the latest medical breakthroughs and healthcare trends with the Reuters Health Rounds newsletter. Sign up here.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

REQUIRING RECIPIENTS TO WORK​

Republicans are divided over how deeply to cut Medicaid, which is jointly funded by the federal government and states. The program cost Washington $618 billion last year and is projected by the Congressional Budget Office to grow 60% over the coming 10 years.
Party moderates are resisting deep cuts to the program, worried that could hurt their constituents. Trump and party leaders have assured lawmakers that they will not cut benefits, though it is not clear what they mean.
Republicans broadly support adding a work requirement for adult recipients, arguing that tax dollars should not go to those unwilling to support themselves. Supporters of the program say the expansion to some adult recipients has led to the lowest uninsured rate in U.S. history, leading to better health and economic outcomes for the country as a whole.
Advertisement · Scroll to continue

A Republican proposal in 2023 would have required able-bodied adults between the ages of 19 and 55 who do not have dependents to spend at least 80 hours a month either working or participating in job training or community service.
CBO estimated that would exclude 1.5 million current recipients and reduce federal spending by $109 billion over 10 years. Roughly 900,000 would remain covered through their state programs, while 600,000 would become uninsured, CBO said.
Analysts say a work requirement could inadvertently force out qualified Medicaid recipients, due to the increased administrative hurdles they would face to prove eligibility.
Georgia included a work requirement when it opted into the Obamacare expansion in 2023. According to news reports,, opens new tab relatively few, opens new tab people have signed up as the requirement to prove they are working has complicated enrollment.

STEP UP VERIFICATION, EXCLUDE NONCITIZENS​

Though they have yet to formally propose specific Medicaid cuts so far, Republicans have spoken extensively about eliminating "waste, fraud and abuse" in the program. This could take the form of more stringent verification requirements to ensure that nonqualified people are not covered, though those steps could also end up excluding qualified people who may not be able to provide the required paperwork.
Republicans could also push to exclude noncitizens who are now covered by Medicaid, amplifying Trump's crackdown on immigrants.
Medicaid is currently open to some immigrants who are lawfully present in the country, though many - including green card holders - must wait five years before they can sign up. Undocumented immigrants in the United States are not eligible for coverage. The program also reimburses hospitals for emergency care they provide to immigrants who are not eligible.

Several states, including California and New York, have expanded their Medicaid programs further to cover all poor residents regardless of their immigration status, relying on their own money for this purpose, according to the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation. Others cover some immigrant populations, such as children, who are not in the country legally.
Eligible noncitizens account for 6% of those enrolled in Medicaid and CHIP, a related health program for children, according to KFF.

Republicans could also reduce costs by revoking two rule changes enacted under Democratic President Joe Biden that reduce bureaucratic barriers to enrollment. That would save $162 billion over 10 years and reduce Medicaid enrollment by 2.3 million, according to CBO.

ELIMINATE PROVIDER TAX LOOPHOLE​

Some states effectively shift more of their costs to the federal government by taxing hospitals and other healthcare providers, then using that money to increase Medicaid payments to those same providers. This maneuver increases a state's total Medicaid spending, qualifying it for additional federal funding.
While legal, the practice has been widely criticized as a gimmick or loophole that does not accurately reflect how much money is actually being spent on medical care.
Eliminating the provider tax entirely, along with a similar maneuver used by local governments that operate their own hospitals, would save the federal government $668 billion over 10 years, according to CBO. But that could prompt states to drop 8.6 million people from coverage.

REDUCE SUPPORT FOR OBAMACARE EXPANSION​

Medicaid has grown significantly since 2010, when Democratic President Barack Obama's Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, expanded coverage to include childless adults who earn slightly more than poverty wages. The Supreme Court made this expansion optional for states, and 41 have opted in.
Republicans fiercely opposed that law and tried repeatedly to repeal it, but many Republican-led states now participate in the Obamacare expansion.
Though Republicans have given up on trying to repeal Obamacare, they are discussing ways to roll back support for the Medicaid expansion the law enabled. Roughly 20 million Medicaid recipients are currently covered through the Obamacare expansion.
One approach would scale back the federal funding share of the Obamacare expansion from 90% - the level in place now - to levels closer to what Washington provides for the rest of the program, which ranges from 77% to 50%, depending on income levels and other factors in each state.
This would require states to shoulder more of the cost themselves, kick people off the program, or both.
Even a slight reduction in federal support could cause millions of people losing coverage, as 12 states have "trigger" laws in place that would end or reduce their Obamacare expansions if the federal share of funding changed.
Alternatively, Republicans could opt for a "per capita" cap on Obamacare expansion spending to avoid running afoul of those trigger laws. That would limit spending growth based on some metric, such as inflation. CBO estimates that would save the federal government $225 billion over the next 10 years and remove 3.3 million people from the program.

CHANGE FUNDING FORMULA​

Another option would provide a fixed dollar amount for each participant in the program, similar to the "per capita" approach outlined above for Obamacare expansion participants, rather than the current open-ended approach that currently covers at least half of each state's costs. This would save $682 billion over 10 years, according to CBO, but would also remove 5.8 million people from the program.
House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters on Tuesday that Republicans are not likely to adopt a flat-fee approach for either the Obamacare expansion or the program as a whole.

 
Back
Top