"BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP - IT'S "ALL OVER RED ROVER" SCOTUS WILL RULE IN FAVOUR OF TRUMP

D

Dachshund

Verified User
An Amicus Brief , brief from the Claremont Instute" was recently filed with the SCOTUS.. The brief was largely written by the eminent legal Eagle - Dr John Eastman., and it urges the Supreme Court to do any with "Birthright citizenship as it currently stands.

Eastmen has put together a devastating legal argument against "Birthright Citizenship that is 100% watertight.

The ass-hole, activist liberal Judges blocked Trump's Executive Order ending "Birthright Citizenship" have been exposed as having no real understanding of the 14th Amendment

. They have all just been shat on from a very great (legal )height, and soon they will be totally "TRUMPED" ( i.e. when the President's order to abolish the "Birthright Citizenship FRAUD becomes a long overdue reality).

So I've just got one thing to say to all the leftist, liberal, socialist, Woke neo-Marxist, tiny-penis DUMMYCRATS on the forum, and that's...SUCK IT UP, LOSERS - SUCK IT UP !!

Dachshund - the Magnificent MAGA Hound

Dachshund Lives Matter !!
 
John Eastman, the eminent disbarred lawyer and accused felon.

There is just one way "birthright citizenship" will fall out of The Constitution and that is by the Court making the Amendment mean something it does not say.
 
martin said:
John Eastman, the eminent disbarred lawyer and accused felon.

There is just one way "birthright citizenship" will fall out of The Constitution and that is by the Court making the Amendment mean something it does not say.
Click to expand...


That's dead right, Buddy, and this has been the case for a long, long time."Birthright Citizenship" has been justified to date ON A MISINTERPRETATION of the wording of the 14th amendment.


Why don'e you read John Eastman's recent amicus brief to the Supreme Court and check it out for yourself?


Eastman had to proviie a detailed history of the Founding of America and the events that led up to the ratification of the 14th amendments , as well as the way it was interpreted in the years that followed to prove his case. Eastman is talented writer and his amicus brief , is not the dusty-dry legal prose you might expect . As I say, You should read it, it a very interesting piece of work.


. Eastman's brief urging the SCORUS not to block Trump's Executive Order banning "birthright citizenship" ) as it is currently interpreted in the 14th amendment, is very difficult to fault. I am not a lawyer, but I can read and understand the objective history and logical inferences that Eastman has put forward in this amicus brief, and I would say it is a "knockout" blow to "birthright citizenship" in the US.


Dachahund
 
Not exactly the guy I'd be behind rooting for to win this case. Eastman's something of a fringe nutter.

But, on birthright citizenship, we likely shouldn't be giving it to persons born to parents who have no civic relationship to the US. That is, casual presence in the US via tourism, temporary visa like a student or work, or presence illegally (eg., in the commission of a criminal act) should not be rewarded with citizenship.
 
Dachshund said:
An Amicus Brief , brief from the Claremont Instute" was recently filed with the SCOTUS.. The brief was largely written by the eminent legal Eagle - Dr John Eastman., and it urges the Supreme Court to do any with "Birthright citizenship as it currently stands.

Eastmen has put together a devastating legal argument against "Birthright Citizenship that is 100% watertight.

The ass-hole, activist liberal Judges blocked Trump's Executive Order ending "Birthright Citizenship" have been exposed as having no real understanding of the 14th Amendment

. They have all just been shat on from a very great (legal )height, and soon they will be totally "TRUMPED" ( i.e. when the President's order to abolish the "Birthright Citizenship FRAUD becomes a long overdue reality).

So I've just got one thing to say to all the leftist, liberal, socialist, Woke neo-Marxist, tiny-penis DUMMYCRATS on the forum, and that's...SUCK IT UP, LOSERS - SUCK IT UP !!

Dachshund - the Magnificent MAGA Hound

Dachshund Lives Matter !!
Click to expand...
You have to have an amendment to change the Constitution, the President can not do that, nor can the Supreme Court.
 
Phantasmal said:
You have to have an amendment to change the Constitution, the President can not do that, nor can the Supreme Court.
Click to expand...
Yeah, well something has got to give this time, hasn't it?

Eastman's amicus brief argues that "Birthright Citizenship" as it stands, is a practice based on a total MISINTERPRETATION of the 14th Amendment. In his brief he lays down a facts that prove this. Read the brief for yourself

Dachshund
 
Dachshund said:
Yeah, well something has got to give this time, hasn't it?

Eastman's amicus brief argues that "Birthright Citizenship" as it stands, is a practice based on a total MISINTERPRETATION of the 14th Amendment. In his brief he lays down a facts that prove this. Read the brief for yourself

Dachshund
Click to expand...
No, this Constitutional right has served our country well.
I have no interest in what Eastman claims.

It seems pretty clear to me

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside”
 
If the 14th amendment does what libtards demand, than explain the need for 1924 Indian Citizenship Act
Phantasmal said:
No, this Constitution right has served our country well.
I have no interest in what Eastman claims.

It seems pretty clear to me

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside”
Click to expand...
your ignorance is pretty clear to me

the interpretation of the constitution and subsequent amendments change. it is called judicial review and has happened since 1803
 
zymurgy said:
2 points


1) SCOTUS has changed how many amendments are interpreted. no further amendment was needed in such cases

2) your understanding of American History is laughable
Click to expand...
How Amendments are “interpreted” and how they are changed are two different things, and don’t be so sure based upon an “interpretation” of Eastman that this is the way they will decide, we’ve seen how fast other Eastman “interpretations” sunk
 
archives said:
How Amendments are “interpreted” and how they are changed are two different things, and don’t be so sure based upon an “interpretation” of Eastman that this is the way they will decide, we’ve seen how fast other Eastman “interpretations” sunk
Click to expand...
for almost 50 years you were not a citizen simply from birthright. it wasn't an amendment that changed how we view this so obviously we can change the interpretation back without one as well
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top