Warning for Liberals Burning Tesla's

[Nomad]

Capital punishment for you and your ilk. Street style.

And yet, you vermin get offended when you're referred to as fascists and Nazis.

You get all butthurt when the Hitler comparisons come up.

Even though it fits you scum like a glove.

 

[ULTRA MAGA]

And yet, you vermin get offended when you're referred to as fascists and Nazis.

You get all butthurt when the Hitler comparisons come up.

Even though it fits you scum like a glove.

So I guess you're prepared then? See you out there for a minute or so then? Fucking crackhead.

 

[Nomad]

And yet, you vermin get offended when you're referred to as fascists and Nazis.

You get all butthurt when the Hitler comparisons come up.

Even though it fits you scum like a glove.

Thanks for proving my point, Adolph.

 

[Trumpet]

Capital punishment for you and your ilk. Street style.

So now the Ultra Dolt= Heinrich Himmler.

 

[ULTRA MAGA]

So now the Ultra Dolt= Heinrich Himmler.

Some medical experiments to see what's wrong with your brains first would be in order.

 

[Trumpet]

Some medical experiments to see what's wrong with your brains first would be in order.

OMG, that's getting drastic.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Warning for Liberals Burning Tesla's

Musk only owns 12.8% of Tesla. The other 87.2% is owned by companies funding your 401K's.

Remember when all the JPP MAGAts hated Tesla? LOL

It also shows just how stupid Tesla owners are. You NEVER, EVER put gas containers inside your vehicle for safety reasons.

Unless your idea of fun is for the car to drive itself, or driving from point A to B in relative comfort and boredom, then a Tesla isn't for you. Teslas are boring cars.

Tesla Stock-Price Rout Overshadows Rivian, Lucid Collapses
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/com...pc=U531&cvid=58ae5583ce994ef295ecaf314a21a1af

Tesla stock is down 69% from it peak. Rivals Rivian down 90%, while Lucid is down 86%. Seems all three are headed into bankruptcy territory if they don't stop the plunge ASAP. Why the collapse? One of the top reasons is these companies haven't returned an earning on their stock in years and investors are becoming wary and worried they never will.

Testing both official and unofficial of the Tesla Cybertruck has found that it is a poor off-road vehicle. The number one issue is simply it's weight. This increases ground pressure which in turn makes it work poorly on soft ground like sand, mud, or unstable soil. The next big problem is that electric motor torque in these situations is simply too much too fast causing slip rather than traction.

Why Does the Tesla Cybertruck Struggle so Much Off-Road?
https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/oth...ertruck-struggle-so-much-off-road/ar-AA1jwr58

Everything is pointing to it's too heavy, and too difficult to easily use off-road. Instead, it's looking like a porker and loser choice of an off-road vehicle.

REALITY CHECK: At a neighborhood BBQ I was talking to a neighbor, a BC Hydro Executive. I asked him how that renewable thing was doing. He laughed, then got serious "If you really intend to adopt electric vehicles, you have to face certain realities."

"For example, a home charging system for a Tesla requires 75 amp service. The average house is equipped with 100 amp service. On our small street (approximately 25 homes), the electrical infrastructure would be unable to carry more than three houses with a single Tesla each. For even half the homes to have electric vehicles, the system would be wildly over-loaded. This is the elephant in the room with electric vehicles. Our residential infrastructure cannot bear the load."

So, as our genius elected officials promote this nonsense, not only are we being urged to buy these things and replace our reliable, cheap generating systems with expensive new windmills and solar cells, but we will also have to renovate our entire delivery system! This later "investment" will not be revealed until we're so far down this deadend road that it will be presented with an 'OOPS...!' and a shrug.

Eric test drove the Chevy Volt at the invitation of General Motors and he writes, "For four days in a row, the fully charged battery lasted only 25 miles before the Volt switched to the reserve gasoline engine." Eric calculated the car got 30 mpg including the 25 miles it ran on the battery. So, the range including the 9-gallon gas tank and the 16 kwh battery is approximately 270 miles.

It will take you 4.5 hours to drive 270 miles at 60 mph. Then add 10 hours to charge the battery and you have a total trip time of 14.5 hours. In a typical road trip, your average speed (including charging time) would be 20 mph.

According to General Motors, the Volt battery holds 16 kwh of electricity. It takes a full 10 hours to charge a drained battery. The cost for the electricity to charge the Volt is never mentioned, so I looked up what I pay for electricity.

I pay approximately (it varies with amount used and the seasons) $1.16 per kwh. 16 kwh x $1.16 per kwh = $18.56 to charge the battery. $18.56 per charge divided by 25 miles = $0.74 per mile to operate the Volt using the battery. Compare this to a similar size car with a gasoline engine that gets only 32 mpg. $3.19 per gallon divided by 32 Mpg = $0.10 per mile.

The gasoline powered car costs about $25,000 while the Volt costs $46,000 plus. So, the Government wants us to pay twice as much for a car, that costs more than seven times as much to run and takes three times longer to drive across the country.

WAKE UP NORTH AMERICA!!!!!!!

 

[Dutch Uncle]

More anti-Tesla MAGAts:

It took 11,000 gallons of water to extinguish. The average fire truck carries 2000 gallons, so fire departments have to purchase massive water tanker trucks now.

Libtard environmentalists: where do you think that water, now laced with who-knows-what chemicals, went?

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019...cial-container-had-be-used-extinguish-burning

California firefighters use 6,000 gallons of water to put out "spontaneous" Tesla car

Tesla caught on fire while the driver was on Highway 50 in Rancho Cordova Fire officials said that nothing was wrong with the car before it combusted

Firefighters used 6,000 gallons of water to extinguish a Tesla Model S that spontaneously burst into flames on a busy highway outside of Sacramento on Saturday.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...s-water-extinguish-burning-Tesla-Model-S.html

They are a ticking time bomb

No one said these buyers were smart!

McDonald's sells more hamburgers than anyone else but that doesn't mean it's the smartest choice to make when it comes to buying a hamburger

EVs are a technological dead end. The future is green hydrogen and ammonia.

https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/gol...n-could-grow-into-$1-trillion-per-year-market

 

[EdwinA]

Musk only owns 12.8% of Tesla. The other 87.2% is owned by companies funding your 401K's.

Democrat don't work, so I doubt many of them have 401K's, just drug habits and Mommy's purse.

 

[Into the Night]

They are intended to save lives.

An EV does not save lives, Sybil. It's a CAR!

They will cut pollution,

Define this 'pollution'.

which results in breathing problems and serious health consequences.

What 'pollution'??? Define this so-called 'pollution'. What is it polluting and what is the substance?

They remove all the terrible chemicals being belched out of ICE exhausts.

Chemicals are not 'terrible', Sybil. They simply exist.
Now...let's look at some of the typical chemicals emitted by both gasoline and EVs:

Mining lithium is most often done by the leachment method, requiring large amounts of sulfuric acid and water and several years to leach out the lithium from the raw ore. This improved ore is then shipped to China, where the further process the refined or into lithium metal. This is but one component of the lithium ion battery. NONE of this is necessary for gasoline cars.

Cobalt in large quantities only comes from a few areas, most notably the child slavery mines in Africa. This ore is then shipped to China for processing into batteries. NONE of this is necessary for gasoline cars.

Aluminum is mined as bauxite (aluminum oxide), shipped to aluminum smelters worldwide and smelted into aluminum metal and various useful alloys. This is required for both gasoline cars and EVs.

NONE of these are 'pollution' per se. They are simply chemicals, though sulfuric acid leaching of lithium often leaves large deposits of waste acidic sulfur in water starved areas (where lithium is typically found) AND requires large amounts of water.

EVs use about twice as much energy as a gasoline car, since that energy must be generated and transmitted long distances (most is lost due to waste heat); and generating that energy typically uses natural gas, coal, oil, etc. which must be burned. The results of this combustion is primarliy carbon dioxide (a naturally occurring gas essential to life on Earth) and water vapor (fresh water!). In some places, such as China, coal plants also put out a lot of soot (wasted fuel) that clouds their cities with black haze. This generation also produces waste heat (since such generators are heat engines).

Gasoline cars use about half the energy of EVs, since they burn the fuel directly to produce motion (and waste heat, being a heat engine)

So gasoline cars produce less carbon dioxide (which is not even a pollutant!) and water (which is not even a pollutant!).

They will end oil refineries that pollute huge areas of the planet.

A typical oil refinery is built on a few acres of land. They store their raw material and product in tanks and are VERY careful to keep the plant maintained (leaking oil or gasoline is dangerous!). Yes, they are noisy and they burn fuel to run the distillation process, but that is not pollution. Again, the exhaust is primarily carbon dioxide and water.

An oil refinery is not 'the planet', Sybil.

Your mindless chanting is right out of the Church of Green scripture.
The Church of Global Warming and the Church of the EV stem directly from the Church of Green.

 

[Lionfish]

Warning for Liberals Burning Tesla's

Remember when all the JPP MAGAts hated Tesla? LOL

Mr. Tiny Penis, tell us all here which conservatives said they wanted to buy a Tesla, or any EV for that matter?

 

[EdwinA]

Warning for Liberals Burning Tesla's

Remember when all the JPP MAGAts hated Tesla? LOL

Remember when you weren't an idiot?

Of course not; that never happened. lol

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Remember when you weren't an idiot?

Of course not; that never happened. lol

 

[Into the Night]

Capital punishment for you and your ilk. Street style.

No. Just possible life in prison and enforced restitution (they have to buy the victims a new Tesla). They cannot discharge this debt in bankruptcy, since it was an intentional criminal act.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Warning for Liberals Burning Tesla's

Remember when all the JPP MAGAts hated Tesla? LOL

None of that showed I "hate(d)" Tesla. I simply, and consistently, pointed out issues with EV's and their general unpopularity. That doesn't equate to "hate."

Also, the Right didn't go committing vandalism and arson against Tesla whatever their views of Musk, the company, or its products are.

 

[LurchAddams]

Musk only owns 12.8% of Tesla. The other 87.2% is owned by companies funding your 401K's.

Warning for trumptards who beat up cops and shit on the Capitol floor: Don't worry, trump will pardon you because laws are only for suckers.

Fuck you!

dick.

 

[LurchAddams]

20 years minimum prison is suggested.

El Salvador?

 

[LurchAddams]

So 20 years for vandalizing cars, but presidential pardons for rioting inside the US Capitol while attempting to violently overturn the legitimate results of a fair election?

No wonder no sane, rational people take anything you MAGA maggots say seriously.

You beat me to it. To trumptards: treason or breaking the law only matters when they think they can pin it on a Democrat.

 

[LurchAddams]

How will the Progressive Left reach their goal of forcing everyone into an EV in the next, give or take ten years if they drive Tesla out of business?

I vote Democrat but prefer a fuel-operated vehicle. Sucks when you can't profile everyone, huh?

 

[Into the Night]

MAGA isn't a person, Sybil.