Why did it take 4 hours

USFREEDOM911

MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Immigration protesters arrested after blocking Los Angeles street for 4 hours
05-06-2010 02:16 PM MST
LOS ANGELES (Associated Press) --
Los Angeles police are arresting protesters who chained themselves together on a downtown street to protest Arizona's new immigration law.

Protest spokesman Nelson Motto says 14 activists locked themselves in a circle Thursday and laid down on a street in front of a federal immigration detention center, blocking traffic for about four hours.

Dozens of helmeted officers surrounded the demonstrators before declaring an unlawful assembly and moving in. No injuries are reported.

Officer Gregory Baek says the protesters will be booked for delaying, resisting and obstructing officers.

The demonstrators oppose Arizona's new law as well as local police cooperation with federal immigration restrictions. They favor legalization of illegal immigrants now in the U.S.

http://ww2.cox.com/myconnection/phoenix/today/news/national/article.cox?moduleType=apNews&articleId=D9FHJ3E01

Hey Liberals, suck on this:

"The demonstrators oppose Arizona's new law as well as local police cooperation with federal immigration restrictions."
 
liberal scum is par for the course. The party of criminals and abortion.

Choose death and choose crime!! Vote democrat
 
Immigration protesters arrested after blocking Los Angeles street for 4 hours
05-06-2010 02:16 PM MST
LOS ANGELES (Associated Press) --
Los Angeles police are arresting protesters who chained themselves together on a downtown street to protest Arizona's new immigration law.

Protest spokesman Nelson Motto says 14 activists locked themselves in a circle Thursday and laid down on a street in front of a federal immigration detention center, blocking traffic for about four hours.

Dozens of helmeted officers surrounded the demonstrators before declaring an unlawful assembly and moving in. No injuries are reported.

Officer Gregory Baek says the protesters will be booked for delaying, resisting and obstructing officers.

The demonstrators oppose Arizona's new law as well as local police cooperation with federal immigration restrictions. They favor legalization of illegal immigrants now in the U.S.

http://ww2.cox.com/myconnection/phoenix/today/news/national/article.cox?moduleType=apNews&articleId=D9FHJ3E01

Hey Liberals, suck on this:

"The demonstrators oppose Arizona's new law as well as local police cooperation with federal immigration restrictions."

What's your point, exactly?
 
Yet, the majority of Americans favor this law.

I hope the cops throw away the key.

Immigration protesters arrested after blocking Los Angeles street for 4 hours
05-06-2010 02:16 PM MST
LOS ANGELES (Associated Press) --
Los Angeles police are arresting protesters who chained themselves together on a downtown street to protest Arizona's new immigration law.

Protest spokesman Nelson Motto says 14 activists locked themselves in a circle Thursday and laid down on a street in front of a federal immigration detention center, blocking traffic for about four hours.

Dozens of helmeted officers surrounded the demonstrators before declaring an unlawful assembly and moving in. No injuries are reported.

Officer Gregory Baek says the protesters will be booked for delaying, resisting and obstructing officers.

The demonstrators oppose Arizona's new law as well as local police cooperation with federal immigration restrictions. They favor legalization of illegal immigrants now in the U.S.

http://ww2.cox.com/myconnection/pho...cle.cox?moduleType=apNews&articleId=D9FHJ3E01

Hey Liberals, suck on this:

"The demonstrators oppose Arizona's new law as well as local police cooperation with federal immigration restrictions."
 
why? for a number of reasons

a. to resolve the situation peacefully

b. some on the police force, especially those in charge, support the protests

c. 4 hours is not that long of time to end something peacefully
 
How does that break down along racial lines?



That's quite American of you.

i am willing to wager one internet dollar that the percentage of non-whites, eg., 'hispanics' would surprise you....its clear you don't live in an area with many hispanics and you have no hispanic friends who are here legally....
 
i am willing to wager one internet dollar that the percentage of non-whites, eg., 'hispanics' would surprise you....its clear you don't live in an area with many hispanics and you have no hispanic friends who are here legally....


I've seen the numbers and was not surprised.


Edit: And it's clear that you don't have the slightest fucking clue about me whatsoever. You may want to keep in mind, Yurt, that assumptions you make about anonymous people on the internet may not be remotely close to accurate.
 
Last edited:
I've seen the numbers and was not surprised.


Edit: And it's clear that you don't have the slightest fucking clue about me whatsoever. You may want to keep in mind, Yurt, that assumptions you make about anonymous people on the internet may nor be remotely close to accurate.

so you asked a question about the numbers, but already knew the answer....good job

your posts are a good enough indicator, it doesn't matter if youre anonymous....do you really think people can't judge someone from their written words? good lord, do you know how many authors go by pseudonyms....they're basically anonymous authors (many times famous authors who write a different style).....guess what, they are judged on their words...so are you judged here, by your words...

what i find fascinating is that you did not deny a single thing i 'assumed' about you...:)
 
so you asked a question about the numbers, but already knew the answer....good job

your posts are a good enough indicator, it doesn't matter if youre anonymous....do you really think people can't judge someone from their written words? good lord, do you know how many authors go by pseudonyms....they're basically anonymous authors (many times famous authors who write a different style).....guess what, they are judged on their words...so are you judged here, by your words...

what i find fascinating is that you did not deny a single thing i 'assumed' about you...:)

Apparently, you are unfamiliar with the concept of a rhetorical question.

And you know what? I've read plenty that you've written and judging by your words I've determined that you're not a very smart person. In fact, you're an idiot and you suffer from quite a bad case of the Dunning-Kruger Effect.

Consider everything you assumed about me denied.
 
Apparently, you are unfamiliar with the concept of a rhetorical question.

And you know what? I've read plenty that you've written and judging by your words I've determined that you're not a very smart person. In fact, you're an idiot and you suffer from quite a bad case of the Dunning-Kruger Effect.

Consider everything you assumed about me denied.

wow....that was easy

hit a sore spot didn't i....given your above post, i nailed it on the head. hence why you're so pissy about my 'assumption'

and no, i will not 'consider' anything, i'm right, at least you're honest and do your best to wiggle your out of admitting that instead of outright lying like you've done in the past. i admire that.
 
Originally Posted by tinfoil
liberal scum is par for the course. The party of criminals and abortion.

Choose death and choose crime!! Vote democrat

You forgot, they support racism too.

Funny how you are constantly accusing ME of needlessly injecting race into a discussion....yet here you are doing exactly that with another regurgitation of your past to present revision of Dem Party history.

We've heard it all before, Southy...and as I've schooled you time and again, the Dixiecrats no longer run the Dem party, just like the Radical Republicans no longer run the GOP. Your opinion, supposition and conjecture won't change that.

The subject of this thread is yet another disproven anti-Obama talking point. Deal with it.
 
Unlawful assembly!!! That law is completely unconstitutional!! The constitution guarantees the right of free assemblage.
 
Back
Top