HAHA. Trump says sanctuary cities are engaging in "INSURRECTION"

T

Text Drivers are Killers

Joe Biden - "Time to put Trump in the bullseye."
Democrats ludicrously called the J6ers insurrectionists, but sanctuary city officials really are. Trump needs to lock them up.

april 28 2025 President Donald Trump issued an executive order on Monday to enhance national security and enforce federal immigration and criminal law in so-called sanctuary jurisdiction and take a range of actions against those obstructing enforcement, including eliminating their federal funding. “The prior administration allowed unchecked millions of aliens to illegally enter the United States,” the order states, creating a public safety and national security crisis, exacerbated by transnational criminal organizations, terrorists and others intent on harming Americans.
Citing an invasion at the southern border, which Trump officially declared on his first day in office, his administration is now responding to some state and local officials who “violate, obstruct, and defy” federal immigration enforcement, the order states.

Local jurisdictions who obstruct federal deportation efforts are engaging in “a lawless insurrection against the supremacy of Federal law and the Federal Government's obligation to defend the territorial sovereignty of the United States,” it states.
Click to expand...
 
anonymoose said:
The law.
Click to expand...
AI Overview
1746030477120.jpeg
1746030477304.png
1746030477436.png
+4

No, sanctuary cities are generally not considered to be breaking the law. While there's a debate about whether they should exist, they are not violating any federal laws that require them to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement. Specifically, the concept of sanctuary cities arises from the principle of federalism, where state and local governments have autonomy to make their own decisions, including those related to immigration.
 
AProudLefty said:
AI Overview
View attachment 49189
View attachment 49190
View attachment 49191
+4

No, sanctuary cities are generally not considered to be breaking the law. While there's a debate about whether they should exist, they are not violating any federal laws that require them to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement. Specifically, the concept of sanctuary cities arises from the principle of federalism, where state and local governments have autonomy to make their own decisions, including those related to immigration.
Click to expand...
Thought you meant the illegals.
Oh wait. How can a city break something? How can a city damage something?
You did mean illegals.
 
AProudLefty said:
They cooperate when there's an warrant on a undocumented.
Click to expand...

That's not always true, and of late we've seen multiple examples where sanctuary locales have not only refused to cooperate but actively impeded ICE serving warrants.
AProudLefty said:
So no federal law is being broken. No "insurrection".
Click to expand...

It's one thing to simply not cooperate, it's entirely another to actively obstruct like that judge in Wisconsin (or Boston) did. Where a federal law enforcement officer presents a valid warrant to say, a jail system in a state, that state law enforcement activity has a duty and obligation to honor that warrant, not turn the officer away as many state systems now try to do.
 
Riddle me this: How did they count the number of illegals that came in the US?
Also riddle me this: While they "counted" them; why didn't they arrest them?
 
AProudLefty said:
No, sanctuary cities are generally not considered to be breaking the law. While there's a debate about whether they should exist, they are not violating any federal laws that require them to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement.
Click to expand...
But sanctuary cities do give welfare and housing to illegals and that violates section 1324 title 8 which makes it a federal felony to encourage illegals to live here. They also let the monsters use our schools but all cities do that and that must end!!!

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1324

(A)Any person who—

(iv)encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law; or

(I)engages in any conspiracy to commit any of the preceding acts, or
(II)aids or abets the commission of any of the preceding acts,
shall be punished as provided in subparagraph (B).

(B)A person who violates subparagraph (A) shall, for each alien in respect to whom such a violation occurs—

(iv)in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(i), (ii), (iii), (iv), or (v) resulting in the death of any person, be punished by death or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, fined under title 18, or both.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top