UFO congressional hearings

Cypress said:
I think there are way too many billions of smartphones on the planet now to have any excuses for not having a shit load of crystal clear and unambiguous videos of alien spaceships.
Click to expand...
Not to mention that every space alien is required to have his body cam operating whenever it is in our atmosphere.
 
Trumpet said:
What does UFOs and global warming have in common???????
Click to expand...
Read the post. Oh, scratch that, I forgot that you aren't very effective in that area.

What they have in common is that anyone talking about either has absolutely no personal experience or reason to believe in such, but nonetheless expresses his absolute certainty in such because he knows someone he positively has to trust in telling him what to believe, e.g. "I have to trust the neighbors" or "I have to trust the scientists" or "I have to trust the sanitation workers" or "I have to trust the MSNBC crew", etc. Then he will shift gears and instead profess his faith in the entirely fictional "The Data" that he was told to thoroughly believe exists.
 
Cypress said:
I think there are way too many billions of smartphones on the planet now to have any excuses for not having a shit load of crystal clear and unambiguous videos of alien spaceships.

The explanation that the Phoenix lights were Air Force flares is plausible to me. I don't think there is any good photographic evidence of the Belgian UFO swarm, and Belgian Air Force pilots did not make any visual contact. The English crop circles are known to be a hoax.
Click to expand...
1. There were a few videos of the Phoenix lights as they happened. The "simulation" done by the local military is visibly different in several ways (i.e., illumination, drift). www.facts.net/history/historical-events/35-facts-about-phoenix-lights/

2. The Belgian air force, went on record that their ground and fighter radar contacts were synonymous. www. ufocasebook.com/belgianreport.html

3. Not all in their history:
(1686) The Natural History of Stafford-Shire. Robert Plot, LLD, Keeper of the Ashmolean Museum and Professor of Chemistry in the University of Oxford.

The first known ‘crop circle investigator’ was Robert Plot, Professor of Chemistry at Oxford University in late 1600’s. In 1680, Plot visited farms in southern England to examine this phenomenon first-hand.

Robert Plot, in his words, ‘excavated’ over 50 crop circle sites, and noted farmers’ stories about other crop circle reports. Plot noted simple circles, circles with squares, circle rings, and spirals. Plot noted that animals tended to stay away from crop ‘figures.’ Plot did his own historical research, uncovering additional historical reports. Plot published his first work mentioning crop circles in 1686 in the book The Natural History of Stafford-Shire. Plot hypothesized that crop circles were formed by hollow thunderbolts - - or else it was elves, dancing witches, deer, or mosses. Plot did the first ‘crop circle’ soil sample testing -- he compared dirt from the center of circles with dirt from the inside edge of the circles, and with dirt from outside the circles; where he noted soil dehydration in the circles, and occasionally finding white, sulfurous residues. Plot noted that crop yields, in the areas within the crop circle boundaries in successive years, increased by up to 30%. Many of these same findings are still being found in crop circle formations today.​
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top