AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
So show how or be quiet.
"The true metaphysics of the square root negative 1 remains elusive." - C.F. Gauss
- Thread starter Cypress
- Start date
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Oh, that's right, you can't distinguish between two different people. We just need to remember that it's Into the Night's fault.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
I am ignoring all zero successful models based on math errors. I don't need to make any sort of argument.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Your deaf studies never taught you how internet fora work, did they?
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
You still haven't shown how they are errors and that the application of complex numbers has been unsuccessful.
Didn't your Dum-dum studies teach you how to discuss or debate?
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Not an argument.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
You still haven't clarified what you mean by "they".
You pivoted away from your bizarre contention that math errors are successful models ... out of extreme embarrassment ... to a reasonable assertion that complex numbers are useful.
You need to give at least one example of a successful model based on math errors.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Not a denial.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
You still haven't shown how complex numbers are math errors.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Not a debate. You should sue Dum-dum school.
IBDamoron.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
You're probably getting people mixed up again like you always do.
Into the Night
Verified User
Repetition fallacy (mindless chanting).
Into the Night
Verified User
RQAA. Mantra 1a. Lame.
Tobytone
Verified User
I got one: The Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) cost projections. The model predicted the ACA would cost $940 billion over a decade while covering 32 million uninsured Americans and reducing the deficit by $124 billion. (lol) Guess what, no deficit reduction, 8 million signed up and the cost, 1.8 trillion. Math errors? Kind of, less error, more lies, yet those 'errors' resulted in the successful passage of the ACA. Not really what you're looking for, but it's not like you were going to get a real answer.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Again, you have not demonstrated (yet) how complex numbers are math errors.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
I have not demonstrated (yet) how complex numbers are math errors because that is not my position. You are the one who is on tap to list off engineers who successfully leverage math errors, specifically by taking square roots of negative numbers. You insist that it is done.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Then what is your position? Clarify.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
The obvious error was in the taking of the square root of IRS enforcement of a negative keeping of your doctor.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Clarify? I will extend to you the courtesy of restating my position for the ninth time in this thread.
1. The imaginary number i is not defined as the square root of -1
2. While anyone may attempt to take the square root of negative values, it is never valid to do so in mathematics, i.e. it is bad math
3. All children who regularly showed up for school were taught that it is never permissible to take the square root of negative values
4. While your assertion that "it is done" (i.e. that bad math is performed) is correct, you are incorrect in stating that engineers somehow successfully develop technology on the bad math resulting from trying to take the square root of negative values
Do you remember when you tried to fool JPP into believing that you somehow had a degree in math?