GLOBAL WARMING -- Everywhere is warming twice as fast as everywhere else!!!!!!

[Daylight63]

Oh looky! gfm still hasn't been able to show us how Stefan-Boltzmann can help him "disprove" global warming.





gfm: here's a pro-tip. Don't go up against someone who has far, far, far more education and knowledge in a topic than you do. Stay in your lane which is presumably how to barbecue or some such.

 

[gfm7175]

Oh looky! gfm still hasn't been able to show us how Stefan-Boltzmann can help him "disprove" global warming.

gfm: here's a pro-tip. Don't go up against someone who has far, far, far more education and knowledge in a topic than you do. Stay in your lane which is presumably how to barbecue or some such.

 

[Daylight63]

gfm wants EVERYONE to know they can't support their own positions!


LOL.

'Fess up gfm: you topped out at, what, Algebra 1 in junior high? Yup. Sounds about right.

 

[gfm7175]

gfm wants EVERYONE to know they can't support their own positions!

LOL.

'Fess up gfm: you topped out at, what, Algebra 1 in junior high? Yup. Sounds about right.

Dimlight wants EVERYONE to know he failed English class in grade school.

LOL.

'Fess up Dimlight: you topped out at, what, "ma-ma, pa-pa, and ba-ba" in your newborn years? Yup. Sounds about right.

 

[Daylight63]

Dimlight wants EVERYONE to know he failed English class in grade school.

LOL.

'Fess up Dimlight: you topped out at, what, "ma-ma, pa-pa, and ba-ba" in your newborn years? Yup. Sounds about right.

The most fun part of people like yourself who aren't all that "sharp" is that you can't come up with your own insults and instead, in proper childlike manner, simply replace random words in my insult at you.

In the end you look even MORE stupid than you did before. Which is kind of amazing. Seriously.

 

[gfm7175]

The most fun part of people like yourself who aren't all that "sharp" is that you can't come up with your own insults and instead, in proper childlike manner, simply replace random words in my insult at you.

In the end you look even MORE stupid than you did before. Which is kind of amazing. Seriously.

It's called mimicry (and in this case it is meant to entertain and/or ridicule). It's one of the reasons why I choose to use a catbird as my avatar.

An Expert Mimic: The Gray Catbird | Bird Academy • The Cornell Lab

The Gray Catbird is able to mimic the vocalizations of several other birds, and even other animals. Males with the most variety of sounds may be the most at ...

academy.allaboutbirds.org

 

[ZenMode]

Well, you aren't saying it now that I pointed out how stupid it was for you to have said it.


There is no such thing as incorrectly applying science that always applies. You have to apply it, always ... and there is no incorrect way to apply it because science because it is science and there is only one way to apply it, and that is by applying it. Science isn't subjective and isn't some sort of technique.

Remind me again why you are involved in this discussion?

Yo don't need an understanding of ay

"There is no such thing as incorrectly applying science that always applies. "

So, I could use the referenced radiance equation to calculate how long it would take two trains to meet on a train track if one left New York traveling west at 58 mph and the other train left San Diego traveling east at 77 mph?

I'm quite sure someone, with enough information, could calculate how much air is released from a balloon, and how quickly it's released, if you opened the valve. If you calculated that correctly, that doesn't mean you'd be correct if you tried to use the released air equation to determine the distance from Mars to Earth.

 

[Daylight63]

It's called mimicry (and in this case it is meant to entertain and/or ridicule). It's one of the reasons why I choose to use a catbird as my avatar.

An Expert Mimic: The Gray Catbird | Bird Academy • The Cornell Lab

The Gray Catbird is able to mimic the vocalizations of several other birds, and even other animals. Males with the most variety of sounds may be the most at ...

academy.allaboutbirds.org

YOu guys are nothing if not masters of post hoc justification to cover your own limitations. I'll give you that.

 

[gfm7175]

YOu guys are nothing if not masters of post hoc justification to cover your own limitations. I'll give you that.

Did you figure out how everywhere could possibly be warming "twice as fast as" everywhere else yet?

Did you figure out how Earth's temperature is supposedly increasing without any additional thermal energy being present?

Did you figure out how Earth's temperature is supposedly increasing DESPITE Earth's radiance supposedly decreasing?

Did you figure out how redistributing Earth's thermal energy (from one part of Earth to another part of Earth) somehow increases Earth's temperature?

 

[Into the Night]

YOu don't need to worry your tiny little head about it. It probably requires some understanding of math and statistics and those aren't your areas as we saw with your failure to use the STefan-Boltzmann equation to disprove global warming.

You deny mathematics. Statistical math is part of mathematics.

The Stefan-Boltzmann law is r = C*e*t^4 where, 'r' is radiance in watts per square area, 'C' is a natural constant (which serves to convert the relation to our units of measurement), 'e' is 'emissivity' or how well a surface absorbs or emits light (a measured constant), and 't' is temperature in deg K.

If something warms for ANY reason, it emits MORE light, and losing energy to do it.

You cannot trap light.
You cannot trap heat.
You cannot trap thermal energy. There is always heat.

You are attempting to trap light, ignoring the Stefan-Boltzmann law and Plank's laws.
No Magick Holy Gas has the capability to trap light.

 

[Into the Night]

LOL. You've been seen. Everyone knows now that you ain't got nothin'. You can't even do a simple calc with S-B let alone use it to disprove global warming. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Attempted force of negative proof fallacy.

You are ignoring the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics. You cannot create energy out of nothing. No Magick Holy Gas has any capability to create energy out of nothing.

 

[Into the Night]

LOL. You've been seen. Everyone knows now that you ain't got nothin'. You can't even do a simple calc with S-B let alone use it to disprove global warming. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

As temperature increases, more thermal energy is converted into radiated light. There are no other variables. This COOLS the radiating surface.

 

[Into the Night]

And gfm is STILL showing us that they don't know what they are talking about.

If gfm had ANYTHING they'd be able to trot it out, but all they ever do is dance around and run away like an enormous dribbling puss.


You are hilarious! Talk about linear algebra next! Then try to make us think you know quantum as well. Next thing you know you'll be up there with Cypress in the BIG BRAIN category! LOLOLOLOL

He obviously knows more than YOU do!

He knows the Stefan-Boltzmann law, which you deny.
He knows the 2nd law of thermodynamics, which you deny.
He knows the 1st law of thermodynamics, which you deny.
He knows some of the statistical mathematics, which you deny.
He knows a bit of probability mathematics, which you deny.
He knows a fair bit of algebra, which you deny.

 

[Into the Night]

This is YOUR issue, dude... YOU are the one who thinks that the SB Law is used to calculate temperature...

...which, of course, isn't possible. The emissivity of Earth is unknown and cannot be measured.

 

[Into the Night]

This is YOUR issue, not mine.

Is anybody buying into your charade of "superior intellect"?

The Church of Global Warming does.

 

[Into the Night]

@IBDaMann, apparently Dum-dum school failed you in English.

"When did gfm7175 become a plural?"

"They" can be used as a singular pronoun if gender is unknown.

Illiteracy: plural used for singular. Redefinition of 'gender'.

 

[Into the Night]

All that talk and not one single mathematical discussion. Funny.

Numbers are involved. Try again, Cletus.

Then show the numbers. I dare ya. Be prepared to justify your source and show all your work.

 

[Into the Night]

You claimed Stefan-Boltzmann could be used to debunk anthropogenic global climate change. You have yet to follow through.



Typical. I've seen losers like you all over the place.

RQAA.

 

[Into the Night]

Doubling down on your ignorance of English.

Inversion fallacy. Go learn English.

 

[Into the Night]

You should learn language changes.

Words don't have an expiration date, Dimlight.

It is now perfectly acceptable to use they/them in a singular aspect.

Illiteracy: Plural used for singular.

Language grows ORGANICALLY which means things change over time without anyone being in control. After a while there's a new rule.

Language isn't organic. Words don't have expiration dates.

Keep up.

"The Associated Press Stylebook, as of 2017, recommends: "they/them/their is acceptable in limited cases as a singular and-or gender-neutral pronoun, when alternative wording is overly awkward or clumsy. "

Illiteracy: Attempted use of plural for singular.
Logic errors: False authority fallacy. Buzzword fallacies. Go learn English.