City workers banned from official travel to Arizona

Topspin

Verified User
City workers banned from official travel to Arizona
San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom announced today a moratorium on official city travel to Arizona after the state enacted a controversial new immigration law that directs local police to arrest those suspected of being in the country illegally.

The ban on city employee travel to Arizona takes effect immediately, although there are some exceptions, including for law enforcement officials investigating a crime, officials said. It's unclear how many planned trips by city workers will be curtailed.

The move comes amid a cascade of criticism of Arizona's law, which has been denounced by civil rights groups, some police officials and President Obama, who said it threatens to "undermine basic notions of fairness that we cherish as Americans." Legal challenges are being weighed to overturn it.

San Francisco's move comes as the Board of Supervisors introduced non-binding resolutions calling for comprehensive immigration reform and a boycott of Arizona because of the new law, which requires police to try to determine the immigration status of anyone they reasonably suspect of being in the country illegally. There are also online boycott campaigns calling for everything from a boycott of the Arizona Diamondbacks baseball team to the Grand Canyon.

The law is popular with many in Arizona, whose border with Mexico is the site of more illegal crossings than any other in the nation. Supporters say in the wake of a failed federal immigration policy, the law will reduce crime. Opponents, including San Francisco Police Chief George Gascón, say it will have the opposite effect, deterring victims and witnesses of violent crime from coming forward out fear of being arrested as an illegal immigrant.

Supervisor David Campos and City Attorney Dennis Herrera have called for a boycott of Arizona and businesses based there. If the resolution passes, Herrera will try to identify contracts with Arizona companies that could be legally terminated.

Newsom, while blasting the Arizona law as "unacceptable," has expressed skepticism about unintended consequences from a city-instituted boycott, including opening up San Francisco to lawsuits if it includes rescinding already-awarded contracts. He also questioned what companies it would cover.

To address those questions, the mayor today convened a taskforce that includes representatives from the City Attorney's Office, Controller, city purchasing office and his chief of staff to look at a "smart and effective" targeted boycott, Newsom spokesman Tony Winnicker said.

The recommendations from that group will form the basis of a proposed ordinance that would be binding on the city if approved by the board and signed by the mayor, Winnicker said.



Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/cityinsider/detail?entry_id=62275&tsp=1#ixzz0mONyKtnc
 
San Francisco, is another Sanctuary City for illegals. Too bad they did not ban illegals from their city, instead they let illegals loose to kill families.

Family Sues San Francisco Saying Sanctuary Law to Blame for Murder of Father, Two Sons

The family of a father and two sons allegedly murdered by an illegal immigrant last year reportedly is suing the city of San Francisco, claiming its "sanctuary city" policy contributed to their deaths.

Anthony Bologna, 48, and his sons Michael, 20, and Matthew, 16, were returning from a picnic when they were gunned down on June 16, by Salvadoran national Edwin Ramos, 22.

The case prompted public outcry after it emerged that Ramos was convicted of two gang-related felonies when he was 17, but local officials did not contact federal agencies to determine his immigration status.

The Bologna family filed a lawsuit Tuesday alleging that the city's sanctuary policy shielding illegal immigrants from questions about their citizenship status — even those charged with a crime — was to blame, KCBS San Francisco reported.

"The city adopted and enforced a policy that was actually inconsistent with and prohibited by federal law," Bologna family attorney Michael Kelly was quoted as saying.
 
Youre fucking kinding me right?

You are FOR this law?


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAh

Yeah. It doesn't really justify racail profiling. There must be an encounter for some other reason before and other criteria must be met before immigration status inquiries can proceed.
 
Haha...too funny. Boycots are going to take place which is the right of the people but I am keeping tabs on those who called the "boycot" placed upon the Ditzie Chicks "un-American" or whatever and their reaction to this boycott. Gotta love this country. I do. :)
 
Haha...too funny. Boycots are going to take place which is the right of the people but I am keeping tabs on those who called the "boycot" placed upon the Ditzie Chicks "un-American" or whatever and their reaction to this boycott. Gotta love this country. I do. :)


I think this travel ban by the mayor of SF is pretty stupid, but I don't think that individuals deciding not to travel to Arizona in light of this law is stupid at all.
 
Yeah. It doesn't really justify racail profiling. There must be an encounter for some other reason before and other criteria must be met before immigration status inquiries can proceed.

Walking down the street an officer sees you while you happen to be wearing your brown skin today (it just goes so well with my favorite shorts). The officer stops to ask you if you had seen a brown man running this way. He then notices the brown skin you happened to be wearing today and asks you if you have your papers for wearing brown skin in Arizona.
 
And neither did the people who complained about The dixie chicke treatment for using their American voice.
 
It's great to know we've got our mayor, board of supervisors and head of police all working on ways to ban travel to Arizona. I'm sure locals could come up with a list of things they would think time spent on would be more important than the Arizona issue.
 
San Francisco, is another Sanctuary City for illegals. Too bad they did not ban illegals from their city, instead they let illegals loose to kill families.

Family Sues San Francisco Saying Sanctuary Law to Blame for Murder of Father, Two Sons

The family of a father and two sons allegedly murdered by an illegal immigrant last year reportedly is suing the city of San Francisco, claiming its "sanctuary city" policy contributed to their deaths.

Anthony Bologna, 48, and his sons Michael, 20, and Matthew, 16, were returning from a picnic when they were gunned down on June 16, by Salvadoran national Edwin Ramos, 22.

The case prompted public outcry after it emerged that Ramos was convicted of two gang-related felonies when he was 17, but local officials did not contact federal agencies to determine his immigration status.

The Bologna family filed a lawsuit Tuesday alleging that the city's sanctuary policy shielding illegal immigrants from questions about their citizenship status — even those charged with a crime — was to blame, KCBS San Francisco reported.

"The city adopted and enforced a policy that was actually inconsistent with and prohibited by federal law," Bologna family attorney Michael Kelly was quoted as saying.

I've been following that case. It was a real tragedy.
 
It's pretty obvious why San Francisco officials are calling for boycotts to Arizona... Pander much?


Call to boycott Arizona boosts Herrera with left

Behind every move out of San Francisco City Hall, there's a healthy dose of personality and politics - and the call for a boycott of Arizona in protest of the state's new law aimed at illegal immigrants is no exception.

For the record, City Attorney Dennis Herrera, who kicked off the boycott idea Monday, says he did so on the merits.

"It's about me saying this law in Arizona is draconian and discriminatory and unconstitutional," he said.

Still, it's no secret that Herrera, who plans to run for mayor next year, has been taking heat from immigration advocates for saying he couldn't legally enforce the Board of Supervisors' recent revision to the city's sanctuary law, barring juvenile suspects from being turned over to the feds as possible illegal immigrants before they've been convicted.

The boycott call - no matter what the outcome - definitely ups Herrera's cred on the left.

Then there's the personality aspect of the play.

Herrera made the call without so much as a word of warning to his main client, Mayor Gavin Newsom, who has a statewide race to worry about.

The mayor was not amused, telling reporters, "Let's talk about impact. About implementation. Let's not be hyperbolic about it."

By Tuesday, Newsom was ready to sit down with Herrera and like-minded supervisors to work out a "smart and effective" boycott. He even got the ball rolling with an order banning city workers from traveling to Arizona for conferences.

For all the symbolism, no one knows how much business the city actually does with Arizona. But there is one city institution with strong ties to the state - the San Francisco Giants, who run their spring training out of Scottsdale.

Are they planning to boycott?

"No comment at this time," said team spokeswoman Staci Slaughter.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/04/28/BAMC1D5N72.DTL
 
Walking down the street an officer sees you while you happen to be wearing your brown skin today (it just goes so well with my favorite shorts). The officer stops to ask you if you had seen a brown man running this way. He then notices the brown skin you happened to be wearing today and asks you if you have your papers for wearing brown skin in Arizona.

Care to provide proof that this is what the law allows??

Fact please and not feelings.
 
Back
Top