Considering that more than half the population is women...

It appears that the Republicans nominate the best qualified…and win.
Republicans nominated Sarah Palin for Vice President, even though her only significant experience was 14 months as governor of Alaska --> an obvious and cynical ploy to just get a woman on the ticket.
 
I would say that Kamala wasn't nominated, instead she was installed. They actually nominated one woman, who lost to Trump in his first election. They then nominated an obvious dementia patient which Trump lost to (says a ton for Trump doesn't it?) then they installed a woman after the dementia patient was nominated again and he was caught going full dementia on television.
Technically, she was nominated, by the delegates. She was not elected by the populous of the Democratic Party.

The old way.
 
Technically, she was nominated, by the delegates. She was not elected by the populous of the Democratic Party.
Hence the "I would say"... technically she was installed, the electorate went a different direction after the party limited their choices and refused any and all debates, the delegates just "decided" for them.

The party that calls themselves "democratic" worked hard to demonstrate the opposite. It's like the naming of a socialist state... They put "democratic" everywhere in the hopes that you will be fooled.
 
Hence the "I would say"... technically she was installed, the electorate went a different direction after the party limited their choices and refused any and all debates, the delegates just "decided" for them.

The party that calls themselves "democratic" worked hard to demonstrate the opposite. It's like the naming of a socialist state... They put "democratic" everywhere in the hopes that you will be fooled.
She was nominated by the elected delegates.
 
She was nominated by the elected delegates.
And those were largely selected rather than elected. Superdelegates rule your party nominations, the least democratic primary is the one held by the party that literally calls itself democratic.

Your party chose not to support a primary, silenced debate, and pretty much forced the dementia patient as the nominee, then when his dementia finally became obvious to even democrats your superdelegates simply "chose" even though there could have been a "mini primary" and a few other plans.

The "elected" representatives are not enough to secure a nomination in your primaries, your superdelegates that are not elected selected Kamala.
 
And those were largely selected rather than elected. Superdelegates rule your party nominations, the least democratic primary is the one held by the party that literally calls itself democratic.

Your party chose not to support a primary, silenced debate, and pretty much forced the dementia patient as the nominee, then when his dementia finally became obvious to even democrats your superdelegates simply "chose" even though there could have been a "mini primary" and a few other plans.

The "elected" representatives are not enough to secure a nomination in your primaries, your superdelegates that are not elected selected Kamala.
I do not agree, they held a primary, then the nominee backed out. There was no option for an election at that point, so the delegates chose. You can continue to live in your fantasy land if you would like.

Kamala Harris was nominated by the Democratic Party under the rules of the Democratic Party. She almost won the election.
 
I do not agree, they held a primary, then the nominee backed out. There was no option for an election at that point, so the delegates chose. You can continue to live in your fantasy land if you would like.

Kamala Harris was nominated by the Democratic Party under the rules of the Democratic Party. She almost won the election.
They held no real primary, the DNC silenced competition, refused to hold debates, and demanded compliance. Kamala was "selected" by superdelegates and shenanigans. I know you "disagree" because you want to feel good and believe real hard that the "democratic" in your party name isn't symbolic as if it were a socialist county.
 
I would say that Kamala wasn't nominated, instead she was installed. They actually nominated one woman, who lost to Trump in his first election. They then nominated an obvious dementia patient which Trump lost to (says a ton for Trump doesn't it?) then they installed a woman after the dementia patient was nominated again and he was caught going full dementia on television.
Indeed, she never went through the primary process to be nominated.

It appears that the “bartender to Old Blue Eyes” was wrong about two women being nominated.

Trump lost due to cheating in a few swing states but it worked out well. He is here to clean up the massive mess that the vegetable left behind.
 
She was nominated by the elected delegates.
No primary, no nomination, just an installation to replace the vegetable.

Here is the nomination process and she didn’t meet any of it:

 
They held no real primary, the DNC silenced competition, refused to hold debates, and demanded compliance. Kamala was "selected" by superdelegates and shenanigans. I know you "disagree" because you want to feel good and believe real hard that the "democratic" in your party name isn't symbolic as if it were a socialist county.
I only disagree with your claim that she was not "nominated", she was.
 
No primary, no nomination, just an installation to replace the vegetable.

Here is the nomination process and she didn’t meet any of it:

She met the process for when the nominee drops out.
 
Back
Top