ThatOwlWoman
Not Nice
Well, to be fair to Earl...it was all the way up to two! For Trumpers, that is like advanced level math.
Welcome back! Good to see you again.
Well, to be fair to Earl...it was all the way up to two! For Trumpers, that is like advanced level math.
Republicans nominated Sarah Palin for Vice President, even though her only significant experience was 14 months as governor of Alaska --> an obvious and cynical ploy to just get a woman on the ticket.It appears that the Republicans nominate the best qualified…and win.
Technically, she was nominated, by the delegates. She was not elected by the populous of the Democratic Party.I would say that Kamala wasn't nominated, instead she was installed. They actually nominated one woman, who lost to Trump in his first election. They then nominated an obvious dementia patient which Trump lost to (says a ton for Trump doesn't it?) then they installed a woman after the dementia patient was nominated again and he was caught going full dementia on television.
Hence the "I would say"... technically she was installed, the electorate went a different direction after the party limited their choices and refused any and all debates, the delegates just "decided" for them.Technically, she was nominated, by the delegates. She was not elected by the populous of the Democratic Party.
She was nominated by the elected delegates.Hence the "I would say"... technically she was installed, the electorate went a different direction after the party limited their choices and refused any and all debates, the delegates just "decided" for them.
The party that calls themselves "democratic" worked hard to demonstrate the opposite. It's like the naming of a socialist state... They put "democratic" everywhere in the hopes that you will be fooled.
And those were largely selected rather than elected. Superdelegates rule your party nominations, the least democratic primary is the one held by the party that literally calls itself democratic.She was nominated by the elected delegates.
I do not agree, they held a primary, then the nominee backed out. There was no option for an election at that point, so the delegates chose. You can continue to live in your fantasy land if you would like.And those were largely selected rather than elected. Superdelegates rule your party nominations, the least democratic primary is the one held by the party that literally calls itself democratic.
Your party chose not to support a primary, silenced debate, and pretty much forced the dementia patient as the nominee, then when his dementia finally became obvious to even democrats your superdelegates simply "chose" even though there could have been a "mini primary" and a few other plans.
The "elected" representatives are not enough to secure a nomination in your primaries, your superdelegates that are not elected selected Kamala.
I agree with that.If you are stupid enough to vote for a presidential candidate on the basis of their sex, you probably shouldn't be allowed to vote at all.
They held no real primary, the DNC silenced competition, refused to hold debates, and demanded compliance. Kamala was "selected" by superdelegates and shenanigans. I know you "disagree" because you want to feel good and believe real hard that the "democratic" in your party name isn't symbolic as if it were a socialist county.I do not agree, they held a primary, then the nominee backed out. There was no option for an election at that point, so the delegates chose. You can continue to live in your fantasy land if you would like.
Kamala Harris was nominated by the Democratic Party under the rules of the Democratic Party. She almost won the election.
Why is the Governor of California a man?How many women has the Republicans party ever nominated for president?
Why is that?
Indeed, she never went through the primary process to be nominated.I would say that Kamala wasn't nominated, instead she was installed. They actually nominated one woman, who lost to Trump in his first election. They then nominated an obvious dementia patient which Trump lost to (says a ton for Trump doesn't it?) then they installed a woman after the dementia patient was nominated again and he was caught going full dementia on television.
No primary, no nomination, just an installation to replace the vegetable.She was nominated by the elected delegates.
A change of mind of Biblical Proportions for you.I agree with that.
I only disagree with your claim that she was not "nominated", she was.They held no real primary, the DNC silenced competition, refused to hold debates, and demanded compliance. Kamala was "selected" by superdelegates and shenanigans. I know you "disagree" because you want to feel good and believe real hard that the "democratic" in your party name isn't symbolic as if it were a socialist county.
Untrue.A change of mind of Biblical Proportions for you.
She met the process for when the nominee drops out.No primary, no nomination, just an installation to replace the vegetable.
Here is the nomination process and she didn’t meet any of it:
![]()
The U.S. Presidential Nominating Process
Every four years, U.S. presidential candidates compete in a series of state contests to gain their party’s nomination. The political process is one of the most complex and expensive in the world.www.cfr.org
He was elected.Why is the Governor of California a man?
Your post:Untrue.
How does that support your claim?Your post:
“How many women has the Republicans party ever nominated for president?
Why is that”