Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2010/04/25/tea_partiers_racist_not_so_fast_105309.html
funny.... when we get ALL the data, suddenly that Slate article stating the UW study showed tea party members as racists.... isn't quite so accurate.
Amazing how that happens. Someone cherry picks data and publishes an article based on the cherry picked data. Liberals turn around and start thumping their chests about how racists the tea party members are.... THEN we get the whole story.
Someone (as this article suggests) could just as easily have written how white liberals were more racist given the wider gap in how they rank the trustworthiness of blacks vs. whites.
On "trustworthy," the gap is smaller in the pro-Tea Party group (41% vs. 49%) than in the anti-Tea Party group (57% vs. 72%).
funny.... when we get ALL the data, suddenly that Slate article stating the UW study showed tea party members as racists.... isn't quite so accurate.
Amazing how that happens. Someone cherry picks data and publishes an article based on the cherry picked data. Liberals turn around and start thumping their chests about how racists the tea party members are.... THEN we get the whole story.
Someone (as this article suggests) could just as easily have written how white liberals were more racist given the wider gap in how they rank the trustworthiness of blacks vs. whites.