DOE is getting a DOSE of DOGE

Hawkeye10 said:
Trans Ideology is just about the most important thing to the WOKE Death Cult....for reasons that gets argued about on my grapevine.

I myself suspect that it is because it is a virus to traditional western values, which the death cult is working on strangling, in order to make it easier to enslave the masses.
Click to expand...
What is the R0 of the trans virus? Remember the trans people make up 1.6% of the population.
 
AProudLefty said:
So reform it.
Click to expand...
That's exactly what DOGE is doing. Its not just reforming it, its entirely killing it and its waste and ineffectiveness. Back to the states where its always belonged. You lefties need to for once stop yourselves from relying on a bloated government for your needs or for the needs of any Americans, and
you should be happy that the billions of taxpayer dollars that have been wasted at the govt level will finally come to an end.
 
Libhater said:
That's exactly what DOGE is doing. Its not just reforming it, its entirely killing it and its waste and ineffectiveness. Back to the states where its always belonged.
Click to expand...
Killing it is not reforming it, but I know you're the "slow" brother.

It's time to cull the stupid people in America to raise the national IQ.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Killing it is not reforming it, but I know you're the "slow" brother.

It's time to cull the stupid people in America to raise the national IQ.
Click to expand...
No, DOGE is KILLING the entire Department of Education. Get it now dunce, DOE will be dead or killed, it will no longer be alive.
Perhaps if you grasp this definition of the word killing to attach it the demise of DOE, then your low IQ may reach the high level of
say 50.
 
AProudLefty said:
So reform DoE.

Reforming the Department of Education could improve it, but it depends on what "reform" means and how it’s executed. The Department’s been around since 1980, with a budget of about $68 billion in recent years, mostly funneled to K-12 schools, student loans, and grants. Critics—especially from libertarian or conservative angles—argue it’s a bloated bureaucracy that meddles too much in local education, pointing to stagnant test scores (like NAEP reading and math flatlining since the ‘90s) despite rising spending. They’d say slashing it or devolving power to states could cut waste and tailor education to local needs—think Texas vs. New York.

On the flip side, supporters—often progressives—say it’s vital for equity, ensuring poor districts get funding (Title I alone is $16 billion annually) and enforcing standards like special ed protections under IDEA. They’d argue reform should fix inefficiencies, not gut it—maybe streamline grant processes or rethink loan programs, which ballooned to $1.6 trillion in debt by 2023.

Data’s mixed: U.S. ranks mid-tier globally in education (PISA scores hover around 500, below top dogs like Singapore at 570), but states with more local control—like Massachusetts—often outperform centralized systems. Reform could mean anything from tweaking accountability (No Child Left Behind’s legacy still lingers) to a total overhaul. Without specifics, it’s a coin toss—could make it leaner and sharper, or just shuffle deck chairs on a sinking ship.

@Grok

Hope Linda McMahon makes the right decision.
Click to expand...
It has been fail since day one. Fuck that, do away with it.
 
Libhater said:
No, DOGE is KILLING the entire Department of Education. Get it now dunce, DOE will be dead or killed, it will no longer be alive.
Perhaps if you grasp this definition of the word killing to attach it the demise of DOE, then your low IQ may reach the high level of
say 50.
Click to expand...
Duh. No shit, Hater.

Are you slow because your mother had you in her 40s or were you just born that way? Did you accidentally drown as a kid and spent too much time underwater before resuscitation?
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Duh. No shit, Hater.

Are you slow because your mother had you in her 40s or were you just born that way? Did you accidentally drown as a kid and spent too much time underwater before resuscitation?
Click to expand...
kangaroo-animal.gif
 
Libhater said:
That's exactly what DOGE is doing. Its not just reforming it, its entirely killing it and its waste and ineffectiveness. Back to the states where its always belonged. You lefties need to for once stop yourselves from relying on a bloated government for your needs or for the needs of any Americans, and
you should be happy that the billions of taxpayer dollars that have been wasted at the govt level will finally come to an end.
Click to expand...
Again, that means the blue (lefty) states will have free rein to destructively indoctrinate or brainwash the children.
 
Grok, will giving education back to the states improve the education?

Handing education back to the states could go either way—it’s not a slam dunk for improvement. The logic behind it is that states, being closer to their communities, might tailor education better than a one-size-fits-all federal approach. They could experiment with curriculums, teaching methods, and funding models that fit local needs—say, more vocational training in industrial areas or advanced STEM in tech hubs. The U.S. Constitution doesn’t explicitly give the feds power over education, leaving it to states historically until the Department of Education popped up in 1979. Since then, federal involvement’s grown—think No Child Left Behind or Common Core—yet outcomes haven’t exactly soared. NAEP scores in reading and math have flatlined for decades; only about 37% of 12th graders are proficient in reading, 25% in math (2022 data). Some argue federal red tape and standardized testing stifle innovation.

On the flip side, states vary wildly in resources and priorities. Mississippi’s per-pupil spending is around $9,000, while New York’s is over $24,000—decentralization could widen gaps. Richer states might thrive; poorer ones might flounder. And without federal oversight, you risk a patchwork of quality—some states might ditch science for ideology or skimp on accountability. Look at pre-1950s U.S.: state-run education was a mess of inequality, especially before Brown v. Board forced desegregation. Competition could drive excellence, sure—states like Massachusetts already crush it (top PISA scores globally)—but others might just race to the bottom.

Evidence? Tough to pin down. Countries like Finland (centralized) and Switzerland (decentralized) both ace education, but their cultures and funding dwarf ours. U.S. charter schools—more autonomous—sometimes outperform public schools, sometimes don’t; it’s a mixed bag. It’d come down to execution: states with strong governance and funding might win, others might tank. No utopia guaranteed. What’s your take—any specific state you think would nail it or flop?
 
AProudLefty said:
Again, that means the blue (lefty) states will have free rein to destructively indoctrinate or brainwash the children.
Click to expand...
Where Trump swept all the swing states, and where blue state people from Kalifornicator and New York etc. are leaving
those sanctuary states of illegals for brighter skies in Texas, Florida, Tennessee etc. where they''' surely turn to
voting for the sane Republican Party. Methinks your anti American Marxist dem party is all but dead. You have
no leaders at all and your Marxist-DEI agenda isn't doing well at all with the American people. Every poll taken
on the most important issues currently taking place in America favors the Republicans over the dems by a 80 to
20 rating. Face it, your party is dead, just like DOE/DEI/Tranny Pride/Men in Womens' sports/heightened taxation/
catering to criminal illegals/anti Semitism/anti Merit/pro Equity/anti police/$100,000 sexual surgery for imprisoned
illegals/BLM & Pro Hamas violent protests etc. etc. There is zero pro American attributes coming from dems or from
their party or their people. ZERO!
 
Libhater said:
Where Trump swept all the swing states, and where blue state people from Kalifornicator and New York etc. are leaving
those sanctuary states of illegals for brighter skies in Texas, Florida, Tennessee etc. where they''' surely turn to
voting for the sane Republican Party. Methinks your anti American Marxist dem party is all but dead. You have
no leaders at all and your Marxist-DEI agenda isn't doing well at all with the American people. Every poll taken
on the most important issues currently taking place in America favors the Republicans over the dems by a 80 to
20 rating. Face it, your party is dead, just like DOE/DEI/Tranny Pride/Men in Womens' sports/heightened taxation/
catering to criminal illegals/anti Semitism/anti Merit/pro Equity/anti police/$100,000 sexual surgery for imprisoned
illegals/BLM & Pro Hamas violent protests etc. etc. There is zero pro American attributes coming from dems or from
their party or their people. ZERO!
Click to expand...
The rhetoric sounds too much like this example for comfort.

"If, with the help of his Marxist creed, the Jew is victorious over the other peoples of the world, his crown will be the funeral wreath of humanity and this planet will, as it did thousands of years ago, move through the ether devoid of men."

For Congressional and Senate races, since 1968, American Jews have voted about 70–80% for Democrats; this support increased to 87% for Democratic House candidates during the 2006 elections.

Want to try again, @Libhater?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top