Reynolds signs law ending trans civil rights protections; Iowa 1st state to repeal rights

MAGA isn't a person, Sybil. Your threats and warmongering are impotent.
^^^
X9EmwBi.gif
 
I got it. Thats why your sarcasm is dumb.

Fat people DO have the right not to be discriminated against.
Do they? They don't actually, unless you're talking about a handful of libtard cities and States 'special stupidity.' Not in the Constitution. In fact, let's let Grok (your new brain) to give us a list of those libtard places:

Washington State
Michigan
San Francisco, California
Santa Cruz, California

Oh yes, those are just the places I'd expect. But you see, you're full of shit as usual. You missed the point, there's no end to the number of groups that deserve special rights in a utopia. The problem is, there's no such thing as a utopia, and thank God for that. How boring would that be? It happens to be the differences and all the ways we're oppressed that makes life interesting and builds strength, character, and satisfaction when we overcome the oppressive realities of life.
 
Do they? They don't actually, unless you're talking about a handful of libtard cities and States 'special stupidity.' Not in the Constitution. In fact, let's let Grok (your new brain) to give us a list of those libtard places:

Washington State
Michigan
San Francisco, California
Santa Cruz, California

Oh yes, those are just the places I'd expect. But you see, you're full of shit as usual. You missed the point, there's no end to the number of groups that deserve special rights in a utopia. The problem is, there's no such thing as a utopia, and thank God for that. How boring would that be? It happens to be the differences and all the ways we're oppressed that makes life interesting and builds strength, character, and satisfaction when we overcome the oppressive realities of life.
People keep speaking of "special rights" and yet they couldnt tell us what they are.

As to the "oppressive realities of life", Black people had it hard back then.
 
9mm is a widely used standard, which tends to mean that it works best.
Yes, 9mm is a widely used standard, not because it somehow "works better" but because the 9mm round is "just right." It can stop an adversary without the bullet going through him and then going through the wall behind him and then going through the wall behind that and killing the unseen child or other person that happens to be on the other side. If you are looking for a good self-defense weapon in an urban setting with many walls and windows and rooms, the 9mm is a great choice, hence a widely used standard.

The .45 was literally designed to kill horses(a much bigger creature than a human).
Nope. The .45 was designed to provide the additional, needed stopping power its predecessor lacked. It was developed for wartime applications.

I cannot imagine needing to defend myself from a horse.
I don't know where you got that piece of misinformation.

Revolvers are more reliable, but have a slower action.
Yes, more reliable but limited on the capacity.

You can get off 10 rounds from a 9mm stacked semi in the time it would take an average shooter to shoot 2 rounds from a revolver.
Keep in mind that anyone getting off ten rounds in that short amount of time isn't aiming; he's distracting ... or providing cover for someone.

So I would want something that would shoot as many shots as it would take to hit the target.
Have you considered a shotgun? One shot and you spray your adversary across a wall. Shotguns are very convincing to adversaries that they should just remain motionless until the police arrive, voluntarily or otherwise.

And again, I have no immediate plans to buy a gun. I am clearly thinking about it.
The next time you are thinking about it, look up some Glock, Sig Sauer and Baretta/Taurus semiautomatic 9mm pistols. Your mention of 9mm as a standard for what you are describing was spot on.

GLPI1750201_3_HR.jpeg

SIG-Sauer-P365-Fuse-2.jpg

M9-pistolet.jpg
 
Yes, 9mm is a widely used standard, not because it somehow "works better" but because the 9mm round is "just right." It can stop an adversary without the bullet going through him and then going through the wall behind him and then going through the wall behind that and killing the unseen child or other person that happens to be on the other side. If you are looking for a good self-defense weapon in an urban setting with many walls and windows and rooms, the 9mm is a great choice, hence a widely used standard.


Nope. The .45 was designed to provide the additional, needed stopping power its predecessor lacked. It was developed for wartime applications.


I don't know where you got that piece of misinformation.


Yes, more reliable but limited on the capacity.


Keep in mind that anyone getting off ten rounds in that short amount of time isn't aiming; he's distracting ... or providing cover for someone.


Have you considered a shotgun? One shot and you spray your adversary across a wall. Shotguns are very convincing to adversaries that they should just remain motionless until the police arrive, voluntarily or otherwise.


The next time you are thinking about it, look up some Glock, Sig Sauer and Baretta/Taurus semiautomatic 9mm pistols. Your mention of 9mm as a standard for what you are describing was spot on.

GLPI1750201_3_HR.jpeg

SIG-Sauer-P365-Fuse-2.jpg

M9-pistolet.jpg
Old Walter, AKA Rarely Right Walter, didn't get much right.

The Glock, Sig Sauer and Baretta/Taurus semiautomatic 9mm pistols.are some of the finest pieces ever made and worth the prices.

Racking a 12 gauge shotgun or any gauge gunshot will certainly get the attention of any bad guy.

A .410 is a good piece for a woman in the home. Light and easy to handle. A bit pricey, around 700 dollars and the ammo can be scarce at times.

For Rarely Right Walter, a slingshot would be good, he can't hurt himself with a slingshot...much.
 
If your concerns are correct, when you need gun you won't be able to buy one. I've been to several countries and never been asked if I own a gun.

A 9mm handgun is the most common weapon in the United States and the one most often used in "gun violence".....usually with one shot to the head. LOL Second by gang-bangers, third in domestic violence.

I carry a pocket 9mm concealed carry but only have 4 rounds in it to save the magazine and with the chamber empty. While police should run toward the gunfire, I'll be heading away from it and dragging my family and anyone else who needs help with me. It's for self-defense, not offense. OTOH, a .22 revolver or semi-auto is an assassination weapon. To avoid missing, it should be placed up against the lower skull. A scoped large-bore hunting rifle if for long range assassinations. I'm 69 with a bad knee. I don't plan on getting into running gun battles with Trump's blackshirts. In a revolution, my tactic would be selective assassinations of local fascist leaders and prominent supporters plus teaching ambush tactics to more able patriots than myself.

Why won't he?

Your bullshit about "head shots" is laughable.

I've never seen a "pocket 9mm." I wouldn't carry any gun in my pocket!
ROFL! You can't own a gun, and once again you prove you're a coward.
Assassination weapon? WTF is that? You know nothing about long range
rifles, twit. The most accurate rifle in my collection shoots a 55 grain Nosler
ballistic tip at 3850 fps. The .220 Swift is one of the flattest shooting calibers
ever made. My second is the .243 Sako, although I don't shoot it too often.
My 700 BDL '.06 hunting rifle is a close third. My National Match M1 Garand
comes in as close, also proven accurate at 600 yd using gov. ammo. My gun
of choice for the years I shot competitively in the M1 military weapon class.

IMG_3793_1200.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top