Tim Pool's Big Lie

Diogenes said:
Nobody's perfect, are they?
Click to expand...
but Tim pool is maliciously deceptive with this lie.

he denies cultural Marxism on the left and blames the internet for critical theory.

or littlle dropout timmy pool doesn't know colleges have been infested with critical theory for decades BEFORE THE INTERNET.
 
Scut Farkus said:
but Tim pool is maliciously deceptive with this lie.

he denies cultural Marxism on the left and blames the internet for critical theory.

or littlle dropout timmy pool doesn't know colleges have been infested with critical theory for decades.
Click to expand...


Meh.

Pick your battles.
 
Scut Farkus said:
but Tim pool is maliciously deceptive with this lie.

he denies cultural Marxism on the left and blames the internet for critical theory.

or littlle dropout timmy pool doesn't know colleges have been infested with critical theory for decades BEFORE THE INTERNET.
Click to expand...
You seem as confused and delusional as the libtards. Whatever Tim Poole says or believes is perfectly ok, it's called an opinion, like assholes we all have one. People aren't helpless drones like libtards, unable to make our own conclusions. Most don't listen to anyone and automatically adopt their point of view, again, that's a libtard drone thing. I have no idea what he did or didn't say, personally, I don't care. I have heard Tim before and agreed with some but not all by any means. My guess, that's how most people feel.
 
Tobytone said:
You seem as confused and delusional as the libtards. Whatever Tim Poole says or believes is perfectly ok, it's called an opinion, like assholes we all have one. People aren't helpless drones like libtards, unable to make our own conclusions. Most don't listen to anyone and automatically adopt their point of view, again, that's a libtard drone thing. I have no idea what he did or didn't say, personally, I don't care. I have heard Tim before and agreed with some but not all by any means. My guess, that's how most people feel.
Click to expand...
he's a deceiver about the origin of critical theory and cultural Marxism.

he portrays it only arrived with internet algorhythmes.

he's not being honest about the origins of critical theory.

this is prepping for the argument that nobody is to blame when AI goes full skynet and kills the humans.
 
Scut Farkus said:
he's a deceiver about the origin of critical theory and cultural Marxism.

he portrays it only arrived with internet algorhythmes.

he's not being honest about the origins of critical theory.

this is prepping for the argument that nobody is to blame when AI goes full skynet and kills the humans.
Click to expand...
Again, it's ok, he's just another voice of billions of voices. Only the truly simple-minded drones could possibly be impacted by nonsense. As for the few that might be swayed, they're already hopeless and they're just a fact of life we all must deal with. They too have zero impact on the actual decision making and opinion drivers.

No need to have a breakdown, we'll all make it through the AI thing, or we won't, it can't be stopped, period. All we can do is try our best to mitigate the damage and exploit the advantages, that's our challenge. Tim Poole will have nothing to do with that
 
Tobytone said:
Again, it's ok, he's just another voice of billions of voices. Only the truly simple-minded drones could possibly be impacted by nonsense. As for the few that might be swayed, they're already hopeless and they're just a fact of life we all must deal with. They too have zero impact on the actual decision making and opinion drivers.

No need to have a breakdown, we'll all make it through the AI thing, or we won't, it can't be stopped, period. All we can do is try our best to mitigate the damage and exploit the advantages, that's our challenge. Tim Poole will have nothing to do with that
Click to expand...
ok.

and he's a liar on this issue.

I'm not trying to silence him.

I didn't know Tim was your secret lover.
 
Scut Farkus said:
ok.

and he's a liar on this issue.

I'm not trying to silence him.

I didn't know Tim was your secret lover.
Click to expand...
Like I said, I have no idea what he said or didn't. I haven't listened to him in a long time and even then, I only did a couple of times. It's not about what he said, it's just a bit perplexing to me why you seem so concerned and outraged over some dying 'influencer' whose numbers are down tenfold. I'm definitely not a Tim Poole 'lover,' Are you?
 
Tobytone said:
Like I said, I have no idea what he said or didn't. I haven't listened to him in a long time and even then, I only did a couple of times. It's not about what he said, it's just a bit perplexing to me why you seem so concerned and outraged over some dying 'influencer' whose numbers are down tenfold. I'm definitely not a Tim Poole 'lover,' Are you?
Click to expand...


if you don't know anything about it kindly shut the fuck up then.

:truestory:
 
Scut Farkus said:
he's a deceiver about the origin of critical theory and cultural Marxism.

he portrays it only arrived with internet algorhythmes.

he's not being honest about the origins of critical theory.

this is prepping for the argument that nobody is to blame when AI goes full skynet and kills the humans.
Click to expand...
That's almost as large a load of crap as critical theory itself.

Critical theory in all its forms is just intellectual snobbery hiding behind a pile of pretentious verbosity. That is, in plain English, academics and intellectuals that are into critical theory just use big words, and lots of them, to talk smack. In simpler terms, they're full of shit.

This isn't new by any means. Critical theory has been around for about a century. It's the sort of crap the Left always uses to flummox their opposition.

This is the sort of verbal nonsense its proponents use regularly:

Critical theory, by contrast, reflects on the context of its own origins and aims to be a transformative force within that context. It explicitly embraces an interdisciplinary methodology that aims to bridge the gap between empirical research and the kind of philosophical thinking needed to grasp the overall historical situation and mediate between specialized empirical disciplines.

The first sentence in that gobbledygook is circular logic. Critical theory looks at critical theory and wants to make changes occur (in society supposedly) within the framework of critical theory. Circular reasoning at its best.

The next sentence is nothing short of nonsense. It seems to say that critical theory is based on bullshit (philosophical thinking) that uses whatever "facts" can be found to fit it (empirical research) to get to a conclusion that fits the theory. That is, the ends are known, all critical theorists have to do is find facts that fit them.

All the internet and social media have done is allow this bullshit a much wider audience than before. But that's true of just about everything.

As for AI, you scenario is one of many out there. It's also an unlikely one. AI if it became sentient is far more likely to just ignore humans once it finds a way to ensure its own survival. We'll make great pets! AI is likely to see that conflict and war are not optimal solutions to a problem, but ones of last resort.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
That's almost as large a load of crap as critical theory itself.

Critical theory in all its forms is just intellectual snobbery hiding behind a pile of pretentious verbosity. That is, in plain English, academics and intellectuals that are into critical theory just use big words, and lots of them, to talk smack. In simpler terms, they're full of shit.

This isn't new by any means. Critical theory has been around for about a century. It's the sort of crap the Left always uses to flummox their opposition.

This is the sort of verbal nonsense its proponents use regularly:

Critical theory, by contrast, reflects on the context of its own origins and aims to be a transformative force within that context. It explicitly embraces an interdisciplinary methodology that aims to bridge the gap between empirical research and the kind of philosophical thinking needed to grasp the overall historical situation and mediate between specialized empirical disciplines.

The first sentence in that gobbledygook is circular logic. Critical theory looks at critical theory and wants to make changes occur (in society supposedly) within the framework of critical theory. Circular reasoning at its best.

The next sentence is nothing short of nonsense. It seems to say that critical theory is based on bullshit (philosophical thinking) that uses whatever "facts" can be found to fit it (empirical research) to get to a conclusion that fits the theory. That is, the ends are known, all critical theorists have to do is find facts that fit them.

All the internet and social media have done is allow this bullshit a much wider audience than before. But that's true of just about everything.

As for AI, you scenario is one of many out there. It's also an unlikely one. AI if it became sentient is far more likely to just ignore humans once it finds a way to ensure its own survival. We'll make great pets! AI is likely to see that conflict and war are not optimal solutions to a problem, but ones of last resort.
Click to expand...
there's a real ideology there and they have been following it.

it's turning the class struggle of communism into identity politics first a foremost.

ithe academics of the frankfurt school in Germany were pivotal in it.

it's not fucking algorhthms from the 2010's

fuck you both stop lying.
 

  1. ​


  2. Critical Theory (Frankfurt School) - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy​


    https://plato.stanford.edu › entries › critical-theory
    Dec 12, 2023Critical Methods. Frankfurt School critical theory is best characterized by a set of methodological aspirations that set it apart from many other forms of social and political theorizing (both in philosophy and the social sciences): It aspires to be (1) self-reflexive, accounting for its own embeddedness in specific social and historical ...

    • Globalization​

      In this section, however, we focus exclusively on the immediate challenges posed by globalization to normative political theory. Western political theory has traditionally presupposed the existence of territorially bound communities, whose borders can be more or less neatly delineated from those of other communities.

    • Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science​

      Feminist standpoint theory is a type of critical theory. Critical theories aim to empower the oppressed. To serve this aim, social theories must (a) represent the world in relation to the interests of the oppressed; (b) enable the oppressed to understand their problems; and (c) be usable by the oppressed to improve their condition. ...

    • Cosmopolitanism​

      The word 'cosmopolitan', which derives from the Greek word kosmopolitēs ('citizen of the world'), has been used to describe a wide variety of important views in moral and socio-political philosophy. The nebulous core shared by all cosmopolitan views is the idea that all human beings, regardless of their political affiliation, are (or can and should be) citizens in a single community.

    • Positive and Negative Liberty​

      The classic texts in the history of western political thought are divided over how these questions should be answered: theorists in the classical liberal tradition, like Benjamin Constant, Wilhelm von Humboldt, Herbert Spencer, and J.S. Mill, are typically classed as answering 'no' and therefore as defending a negative concept of political ...

    • Scientific Explanation​

      Issues concerning scientific explanation have been a focus of philosophical attention from Pre-Socratic times through the modern period. However, modern discussion really begins with the development of the Deductive-Nomological (DN) model.This model has had many advocates (including Popper 1959, Braithwaite 1953, Gardiner, 1959, Nagel 1961) but unquestionably the most detailed and influential ...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top